>Those people that go "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE I WANT TO BE NEUTRAL! WHY DOESN'T THIS GAME ALLOW ME TO BE NEUTRAL!!?!?!? REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE" in an RPG
Is there anything more pathetic?
And to all you neutralfags, please post some compelling choices (or non-choices) a neutral character could make.
Other urls found in this thread:
boards.fireden.net
twitter.com
literally said no one ever.
Any Neutral ending in any SMT game.
>this thread again
sage goes in all fields
Just so you guys know, these are the people that think you can either only be far right wing or far left wing. Centrists boggle their mind.
they exist
in the shadows
they dare not show themselves lest they get memed to death
>>Those people that go "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE I WANT TO BE NEUTRAL! WHY DOESN'T THIS GAME ALLOW ME TO BE NEUTRAL!!?!?!? REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"
Nobody ever? Even if there are some, they're just expecting the same alignment system that's in every D&D derived RPG. Of course ME isn't an RPG.
>Not playing Neutral in Strange Journey
What are you, some kind of Fagit?
isnt that the green colour ending
The game literally penalizes you for not doing the same thing every time.
ugh i hate Neutral in SMT wish there was only Law or Chaos
You know the classic D&D alignment is dead, right?
>suddenly a choice that's clearly retarded
>you have to do it or you stray from your chosen patch and loose your good/bad boy points
>I wish there were less options and paths in games, ugh!
Stop, drop and roll.
You
How so? The latest edition isn't even 5 years old.
>B-BUT I CAN BE NEUTRAL ABOUT THE DEATH PENALTY!
No you can't
>B-BUT I CAN BE NEUTRAL ABOUT ABORTION!
No you can't
>B-BUT I CAN BE NEUTRAL ABOUT GAY MARRIAGE!
No you can't
Video games are neither of those things. I think you have some mental problems, champ.
And, shit, you can be neutral about all of those, idiot.
Why even use Paragon and Renegade as examples? They're not allegories for good and evil.
This is the videogames equivalent of the tumblr/alt-tumblr false dichotomy. I wouldn't be surprised if OP was a user of either echo chambers.
>most people are moderates and lean slightly one way or another
>WHY ISN'T EVERYONE JUMPING AT THE BIT TO BE A RADICAL FUCKING PATHETIC LOSERS
Yes, I can. Literally don't care about the death penalty, cuz there isn't one where i live. Literally don't care about abortion, because i'm a male and i don't go around pretending i'm a porn star.
and i don't care about gay marriage, cuz i'm not gay, and it doesn't affect me whatsoever.
good rpgs let you choose to go neutral if you want.
so play a better rpg fag
Last time I went neutral I destroyed the universe and made a new one as its god :^)
The more interesting choices in video games are between two different goods, two different evils or two different neutrals
Good vs Evil choices are just so boring, you pick one side early on and stick with that choice for every decision throughout the game without ever thinking any further about it
good going boyo
no more, please
Go suck some BBCs Mugi we have almost every thread every day, the rest is sperging about the newest SJW shit.
boards.fireden.net
>24 results found
>REEEEEEEEEE
>he's not choosing a side!!
>I can't insult him if i Don't know his political opinion and/or identity
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
I'd rather have no discernible choices, good, bad or neutral. That's stupid, I just want choices that do different things, not based on alignment. What kind of retarded strawman is this question anyways?
There could not possibly be more than one person who gives enough of a shit about this to make this fucking thread everyday. It's a small part of a shit game genre.
>I don't give a shit do whatever man
You get the two options where you do something about it and then "I dunno man, see ya"
Neutral is shit tier.
That's indecision, not neutrality.
Being neutral is usually more interesting than being gay good wimp or evil psycho asshole who murders puppies. Also, sage, because it's a shitty bait