1080p30 with drops to 18 FPS

>1080p30 with drops to 18 FPS
>1080p30-50
>1080p40-60
Take your pick Sup Forums.

Other urls found in this thread:

anandtech.com/show/4955/the-bulldozer-review-amd-fx8150-tested/8
youtube.com/watch?v=sc4dsiq-I7g
gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1070-vs-AMD-RX-480/3609vs3634
youtube.com/watch?v=ewRra2x4mL8
youtube.com/watch?v=EyuoQIuEZj0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>1080p60fps

ftfy

>1440p@144hz

ftfy

That's not an option in this case.

What game?

Sniper Elite 4

Why not? Game is on PC.

>2160p@200hz

ftfy

Let's say you're a pleb and are getting it on consoles.
Which would you prefer?

games look better on a ps4 pro with 4k HDR

t. me

Why would you be a pleb to begin with?

/thread

The not overpriced one with games.

>you need a $600 GPU to max current games at 1080p 60fps

>there is a single GPU capable of playing current games at these specs

jesus Sup Forums is full of retards

>All those red lines
Those usually represent screen tearing in DF's videos right?

Pro probably but I would never be playing a shooter on console to begin with.

The PS4 Pro runs the game at 1080p and doesn't take advantage of HDR in this game m8.

I don't see why i would have both an Xbox and Ps4, then buy the Ps4 again and not have a PC.

then it's a shit game

>>you need a $600 GPU to max current games at 1080p 60fps
????

xbox one: retarded
ps4: really wanted to play bloodborne
ps4pro: literal sony fanboy, also retarded

all of the above: literally braindead

an R9 Fury will play games at 1440p no problem, for under $300

>Games look better in upscaled 1080p
Sure

I like how people still believe literal jews. Anyone can build a more capable PC for less especially if they include the cost of a fucking TV.

I think he was trying to say people actually believe that and are fucking retarded for thinking so which he is right.

t. Sonygger

>Accepting anything below a constant 60fps

>ps4 pro
>4k
pick one and only one

>gtx 780 ti - $660

>Accepting anything below a constant 144fps
its like you enjoy not having smooth movement. good luck spotting distant targets while moving the camera.

>*GPU out of production

>blowers

>Not waiting for glorious 240hz
Might as well stick with consoles

This sadly. I used to think 60 FPS was a meme until I started playing shooters at it. Then I realized the sheer inadequacy of 60 FPS for smooth tracking.

>not waiting for glorious real life 1200hz

>8640@400hz

ftfy

Fuck, I wish. I'm currently saving for my next upgrade which will probably be a 1080ti and a 1440p 144hz monitor.

Am I the only one who hates uncapped framerates? I'd rather have a consistent locked 30 over a framerate constantly jumping around in the 30s and 40s. I hope more Pro games come with a cap option like Infamous and Tomb Raider.

I find 1440p to be just sheer extra bonus over just what insane visual and gameplay benefits having 144hz provides. I'd pick a higher refresh rate over resolution any day, regardless of game and genre, even for just general usage.

But, as we are the master race, why not both?

The first non-RTS where DX12 actually makes a decent difference.

>34560@1600

ftfy

Sonyfags act like all PS4 Pro's come with a 4K HDR TV

>Sniper Elite 4

What a shame.

I swear AMD gimp their DX11 drivers to make DX12 look better

>tfw I fell for the 1060 6gb memearoo when the 480 exists
fuck

>I want to play a sniper game shooting nazis in Italy

Said nobody outside of Rebellion.

You and me both, lad.

What game?

All those decent parts wasted on shitty AMD gpus.

>mfw finally saved up 1k to build my first PC
>Sup Forums is telling me to wait a month until Ryzen drops
I hoping I'm not being memed here.

From performance tests it looks promising in both performance and price.

Sup Forums will tell you to waitfag indefinitely.

>just wait for new AMD shit bro
>AMD shit drops
>dude you gotta wait for the new Nvidia/Intel shit
>repeat forever

The cheapest console because you're so intent on buying cheap shit.

Yeah I mean I don't mind waiting, I just hope it's not for nothing when I could buy my parts this minute.

good to know

That is just how it is with tech eventually you gotta bite the bullet and eat those sour grapes later.

AMD sponsored it, I can't find it rn but Linus built it.

>2000$ meme PC
nah, ill still use my gtx760 to get 60fps in 1440p in dirt rally with only 4 out of 20 graphics options set to medium and the rest of the 16 settings set to ultra. your benchmarks that use 8 times anti aliasing are for retards.

cant count the amount of GPUs that actually need/deserve more than 4gb of VRAM on one hand.

You know what else looked promising.

Bulldozer

anandtech.com/show/4955/the-bulldozer-review-amd-fx8150-tested/8

Guess what happened.

>Sniper Elite 4
I'd rather play another game altogether.

nope, blame the game's developer : youtube.com/watch?v=sc4dsiq-I7g
dx12 is at least 100% better than dx11.

Bulldozer was not even on the same scale of hype/actually architecture improvement though.

What are you planning on getting if you bought it right now?

there is literally nothing to gimp.

Suck it losers!

Were you there? Because it was hyped far more than this has been.

The difference now is people learned from the mistake of trusting AMD pre-release benchmarks.

>Because it was hyped far more than this has been.
No, actually, it wasn't.
Even pre-release benchmarks were disappointing, unlike with Ryzen.

That's a nice $800 PC with a $250 SSD, user.

>1060

JUST JUST JUST

Lies
Bulldozer was hyped to hell & back, many people included myself held off on Sandy Bridge because of Bulldozer hype

It looks like Zen is pretty good though

How is the PS4 pro not managing 1080p60? I thought the console is roughly a gtx970.

>I thought the console is roughly a gtx970.
Closer to a 280x actually.

>122C mobo

They said that it will be on par with i7, problem was that Sandy Bridge came same year, bulldozer came out and fucked it.

1280x720

lmao

Gimped CPU is the big problem
You can get around it if you are really fucking good at multi threading like say Dice & Naughty Dog, but otherwise it's a big bottleneck

the rx480 is exactly what the pre release benchmarks showed us, its just a little slower than a gtx1070 for a much reduced cost.

...

the ps4 pro is still first and formost a 2ghz APU.
no where close to a 280x with a dedicated 3ghz CPU.

>1454033300000000000000000p@9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999hz

ftfy

>a little slower
>20 to 40fps slower across the board

gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1070-vs-AMD-RX-480/3609vs3634

Yup, sure is "a little".

>122C mobo
ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

Delusional amd fag

to 40fps slower across the board
>LITERALLY TWICE THE PRICE
>GTX1080 4 TIMES THE PRICE
thanks for proving me right.

how is this not a little?
are 40fps worth 200bux to you?

>i5
>only 16gb of ram and not 32

You listened to Reddit, didn't you?

Amd is shit tier user you did the right thing

I play on PS4 so the 30-50 one.

rx480 = 246 dollars = still get 60fps in 1440p if you disable 8 times anti aliasing
gtx1070 = 453 dollars = 46% faster
gtx1080 = 775 dollars = 86% faster
ooh wow enjoy your 2000$ meme PC

40fps means the difference of being able to play games on max settings for the next 3 years to having to buy a new card 2 years from now just to get 60fps.

don't forget

2x rx480 = 492 = 50%-80% faster

Uh, it really is, user. It's called futureproofing. Do you really want to go buy new parts in 3 or so years because you saved 179 now?

spending more than 300$ on a GPU is pure retardation

Good think that in DX12 rx480 performance almost on point with GTX1070, if you want future proof go with the actual technology.

>upgrade every 3 years so you can enable 8 times anti aliasing because benchmark sites use 8xAA
GOOD GOYIM

>performs on point
no it doesn't.

youtube.com/watch?v=ewRra2x4mL8

>1070
>50 to 100fps than RX480

It sure has worked great before...

Could always lower the AA for moar frames too.

>this is what GT7xxx fags believed
>this is what HD4xxx fags believed
>This is what Riva TNT2 fags believed

It's all good and dandy, until next generation proves you wrong.

>1070 barely performs better than a meme 3.5gb gtx970
you nvidia fags dont know how to chose your battles.

>look at this synthetic benchmark
how about, no?
youtube.com/watch?v=EyuoQIuEZj0