What do you prefer?

what do you prefer?

>game with graphics on ultra settings but 30-45 fps

>game with graphics on medium-high settings but stable 60fps

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=kSCVahyh3Dk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

The latter

I'll take medium-high as long as there's good anti-aliasing

60fps at med-high.
Ultra is for autists who load up games to look at the walls and floors.

FPS > Graphics

stable sixty for most games unless it's an adventure game or something. I don't need constant sixty for Tomb Raider if the trade off is 45-50FPS.

I mean at least remove the fucking CPU before cleaning the mobo

The laptop would be fine if he let it dry out for a few days.

games with graphics on ultra settings \nd stable 60 fps

This

Fun fact: it is prefectly OK to wash unpowered electronics using water, as long as it is EXTREMELY dry once you power it back on. You wanna hit it with a heat gun then let it live in warm towels for a few days.

Electronics are ruined by water because it conductively fuses circuits. It can't conduct electricity that isn't being passes through the board.

framerate>graphics
until im getting sub 30fps on low theres no point in upgrading

i will always love this video.

Ultra settings and above 60 fps
What? are you a consolefag or poorfag that cant choose both?

>towels
>not rice
SHIGGY DIGGY DOO

>Prefectly

Also fun fact: you can submerge electronics in nonconductive fluids like mineral oil or honey and they will work perfectly fine. Mineral oil submersion is a legitimate cooling choice.

This is now a gore thread

youtube.com/watch?v=kSCVahyh3Dk

Will it not do anything to thermal compounds?

ultra+ at 250

high is fine. i can barely even see the difference between high and ultra

>30-45 fps
that's a pretty wide scale

30 fps is unplayable, 45 is tolerable

I would choose 45 on ultra over 60 on medium, 60 on high would be best

I pick the top one if it's a single player game

Bottom one if it's a competitive MP game

Sure, you can just reapply it though