Reminder

Just a reminder that metacritic reviews mean less than nothing

And user reviews that are only 10s or 0s with nothing in between mean less than that

fucking this. shit stains like FFXV and MGSV are more examples of terrible incomplete shit games that were 'critically acclaimed'

It only matters if it praises a game you like, right OP?

>MGSV
>bad

Metacritic matters when it agrees with it

>incomplete

Unless they line up with my agenda.

your review only reduces the metacritic by 0.00000000000001

aka your opinion means almost nothing

MGSV was very good though, shame it was incomplete

Jesus fucking christ man. I've been here for like 8 years and I've never seen this much faggotry over one fucking game. Like who the fuck was even talking about this piece of shit? Literally nobody. And then suddenly a month before release Sup Forums went apeshit and decided that the best idea is to wage war against it by having at least 5 threads a day about a fucking game nobody cared about. Then there was this fucking brom scene and it got posted like 200 fucking times. The livestream didn't help much ether and for some fucking reason people are now in damage control mode because shitposters siwtched sides as soon as reviews came out and they didn't confirm Sup Forumss bias against the game. Can you just fucking stop? People will either buy it or they don't.

:^)

Reminder that Dragon Age was literally the undisputed GOTY in 2014

Sup Forums completely and utterly blown the fuck out AGAIN

10 years ago this game would be in the list of worst games of all time

where did it all go so wrong

They mean exactly as much credibility you're willing to assign to the average reviewer, and how much you think the average reviewer reflects your tastes.

In other words, it means something to normies and means nothing to Sup Forums autismos who are going to spend tonight, tomorrow night, and probably until the end of time playing weebshit and/or csgo regardless of what new games come out and who will shit on literally anything as a result.

Protip: There's no way to convince people a game is good if they don't want to be convinced, so why bother.

>i like game
Shut up shill.
>website like game
Paid for by [DEVELOPER]
>many website like game
PAID FOR BY {DEVELOPER} OR fucking librals.

its over

EA games is finished.

>Back in my day..
>These gosh darn kids..
>This generation..
>What went wrong?

Jesus you sound like my fucking grandpa

I thought DAI was fun, and had more enjoyable combat than the Witcher

So games like Knack and Star Fox Zero are good after all? I mean both of those were also panned by the critics

In what fucking way was DA:I panned by critics?

Sup Forums on suicide watch

...

>undisputed
>Divinity Original Sin
>Wolfenstein TNO
>The Banner Saga
>Bayonetta fucking 2
I took the bait and I don't care

OP said critics dont know shit then I suppose both games are mentioned must be good then

Are you literally developmentally disabled? 10 years ago it would have been a goddamn era-making masterpiece based on the graphics alone, plastic-shiny hair and awkward animations and all. It was a mediocre, lowest-common-denominator single player mmo with lots of voice acting and enough pandering to sjws to keep it in the news and drive sales via controversy. It's not like it's atrocious, it's just bland.

Meanwhile, I'm very willing to bet that a game you liked came out in 2014. Why not like what you like and let the normies like generic shit?

critics really don't know shit though

You don't think there's some sony faggot shitposting the super mario 3d world metacritic?
Shit balances out.

I like Timesplitters 3

I really like dragon age and enjoyed inquisition when I first played it but that game is hot garbage.

But those games were also panned by users.

This is going to join the ranks of Bioshock Infnite, Shadow of Mordor, Dragon Age Inquisition and (probably) Mass Effect Andromeda on the "massively overpraised games nobody remembers in a month" list.

>i don't have a ps4
>high ps4 game scores mean nothing
fuck off nintendrone

fpbp

Which just proves that user scores mean literally nothing

>Game gets a high score
>PAID REVIEWS
>Game gets a low score
>HAHAHA BLUNDER OF THE CENTURY

You're right, they do mean nothing

except i have a PS4 a PC and a Switch pre ordered as well.

No, it's user reviews (scores) that are worth jack shit. For high-profile games they're largely just people gaming the aggregate in extremes.

Critic reviews at the least are universally (I hope) from people who have at least played the games and have some kind of experience with them.

but it's not bad.

Trusting critic reviews for games is like trusting Huffington Post or Infowars for news.

This. User scores are even more biased and less honest.

If you really need to read a review before you get a game then you should spend time looking for a reviewer and reading most of their reviews until you one you really like and generally agree with.

Are you talking about gz or pp?

this.

its fucking hilarious, the hypocrisy that is Sup Forums

...

But GTA 4 was good though.

it was good but it wasn't THAT good

it was mediocre