This kill the /v

...

Other urls found in this thread:

embed.azubu.tv/horizonbrops4/video492157SVHorizonBroPS4
giantbomb.com/reviews/horizon-zero-dawn-review/1900-759/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

I don't trust reviews ill just wait till I see gameplay, its about time I had something else to play other than bloodborne.

We definitely needed another thread about this.

You'd think for such a great game that deserves a 9/10 we'd see more of you actually talking about what's good about it and not just using it as shitposting fuel

Here ya go bro.
Check out the gameplay and realize the game is mediocre as all hell.
embed.azubu.tv/horizonbrops4/video492157SVHorizonBroPS4

DELETE THIS!!!!

>Sonyggers being happy about their second game ever being released.

The only good thing HZD has going for it is graphics and robot dinosaurs. It's sorely lacking in all other aspects.

We are very happy about Nioh.
I don't know about this turd though.

This game will never be mentioned again after a month just like Mafia 3, Watch Dogs 2, etc.

Shitposters will keep it alive.

The PS4 is finally building up a solid library but HZD is not a part of it

So this is the "Zelda killer" huh? AhhahAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

They really wont. Theres actually good exclusives to talk about now and once the sales turn out to be disappointing people will make fun of it then forget about it like they do with all recent mediocre AAA games. It might get brought up occasionally as a "remember when this happened" thing or a bullet point in an "MUH WOMEN AND BLACKS RUINING VIDEO GAMES" autists post but thats it

why?

a good video game being out seems like it'd be great for a video game board's discussion.

We still have Bioshock infinite threads.
Shitposters will keep it alive. whether we like it or not.

>library of 3 games
>solid
EcksDee

AMAZING.

I'm not much in to supporting exclusives but I hope you enjoy your game, PsBros!

You are going to play it, right?

>trusting reviews
>especially IGN

GamerGate needs to be brought back right now, especially with this whole Trump/PewdiePie movement going on.

So it's the same as ARK?

There are more shitposters on Sup Forums then actual people who play games

> WHERE WERE YOU WHEN HORIZON ZERO DAWN KILLED ZELDA

So this means that Zelda is gonna get a bunch of 7s AT MOST.

NO! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Jeff Gerstmann gave it 5/5 which basically means Sup Forums's negative opinion on this is irrelevant

giantbomb.com/reviews/horizon-zero-dawn-review/1900-759/

Something like 48 separate publications rated it 90 or higher. Either there's some massive conspiracy or you're just desperately trying to hold onto hatred for this game, in the face of overwhelming evidence

someone actually posted this yesterday

...

MODS, DELETE THIS RIGHT FUCKING NOW

RIGHT NOOOOOOOOOOOW

Honestly, I'm just going to let their sonyggers do their song and dance.
When BotW comes out and has an overall score equal to or better than Horizon, I'll just sit back silently watch reviews not matter again.

...

Zelda already killed itself long ago after MM. Only retards keep buying the newer games.

>a review site literally called "trusted reviews"

this is how dumb the industry thinks gamers are

and they aren't wrong

This. Horizon is just far cry primal with robo dinos

>mediocre

Do a lot of you use this word unironically in your everyday life? I know its just a word, not even debating the gameplay may not be average but do you realise it makes you sound like a stuffy old bastard to keep using the word "mediocre"?

>qt comes over
>hey user wanna go see "movie"
>huh. No not that one you see, its terribly mediocre...
>o-oh... Ok. S-see ya user.

I have never seen it used so much than on Sup Forums

Sup Forums got blown out so fucking hard this time. Not even making 100 Zelda webm threads and praising the game for common things other games had for over 20 years now but it's innovative because nintendo is doing it will recover them.

>8.8

>everyone says "GAMERS ARE DEAD
>everyone says "BREXIT WILL NEVER HAPPEN"
>everyone says "TRUMP WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT"

That shit might have worked 4 years ago but it just doesn't hold water these days

More like this kills you, since Sup Forums is the only place you can go to try and discuss this game seriously.

>He needs validation on his shit taste

better run to neogaf, to keep from being butthurt

Sup Forums is literally the only website who WON'T allow an actual discussion on this game. just nothing but autistic screeching from all the console war toddlers.

>multiplats arent games

this kills the switch

interesting mental gymnastics

>He is still here

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>all the butthurt comments in USgamer about a game they haven't even played
Is USgamer, dare i say it, /ourguy/?

>since Sup Forums is the only place you can go to try and discuss this game seriously.
You can't discuss any game on Sup Forums seriously that has more than 10 people willing to talk about it.

You must be pretty new to think Sup Forums is for anything more than shitposting and some laughs.

He also admitted it's basically slightly better but thirdperson farcry and said it wasn't for everyone.

(it's for retards who are easily impressed by graphics)

>when a game hand-holds you for so long that you have time to check your text messages
Fucking pathetic

They're the only reputable journalists that aren't paid shills or cucks tbqh.

>Videogame is a bigass fucking joke, with constant proof to back up statement

>surprised when other anonymous browsers cracks jokes at this shitty ass game, screenshots and sound recording to boot.

People "would" discuss it if it didn't take its self so seriously.

This is undoubtedly some 75 pound lefty moron who worked on the game.

>kills Sup Forums

Nah game looks neat but it'll be forgotten and buried in a week when Zelda comes out

I hope to try it down the road but Zelda and Nier are my March and then P5 in April, there is no time

>Months of aggressive shitposting
>IT'S GONNA FLOP
>IT'S LITERALLY FAR CRY (Minus the guns and the first person and the setting and the gameplay) BUT GODDAMN IT'S LITERALLY THE SAME THING!
>75 at best
>ANOTHER GENERIC SONYGGER MOVIE
>I'M GOING TO DERAIL THIS THREAD AND MAKE IT ABOUT ZELDA
>LITERALLY NOBODY CARES ABOUT THIS GAME!

>Reviews come out and you get BTFO
>S-scores don't matter
>THEY WERE PAID
>THIS ONE REVIEW OUT OF LITERALLY EVERY OTHER REVIEWER HATED IT, THEREFORE IT'S CONFIRMED BAD
>Why do Sonyggers keep rubbing this in? We didn't do anything wrong

KEK

Happens every time, you take a game, relentlessly shit on it, get rekt and wonder why people want to rub it back in

yet other people here keep trying to get recognition and validation from Sup Forums users based on bias reviews.


Its time to stop taking Sup Forums2.0 seriously

>big AAA game gets great reviews despite being extremely mediocre

Really shocking.

Are you going to cry like a bitch when, as usual, the new Zelda game ends up with a mid 90s score on metacritic?

Reminder that every console war poster is a just a false-flagging shill trying to portray people who don't like their games as a butthurt person from [insert different console here]

of course he will, he'll act like he never defended reviews like he did just then

>Trusted Reviews
I wonder who could be behind this fake news

The game only got shitposted once the webma and shit were coming out, which is deserved. Before that, it was used for falseflagging in BOTW threads. Ot didn't get that genuine of discurssion either way beyond pointing out that robodinos are cool. The game looked really by the numbers open world, and then the stream showed that it was a buggy, presumably unfun game. The reviews are pretty unsurprising, considering the state of games "journalism", but people were definitely expecting lower, and for good reason, I feel. But I don't think anyone actually cares if it does well or not.

Typical ignorant Sup Forumstard. The reviews are trusted, hence the name you fucking moron. Go back to your "alternative facts" hugbox please.

This game seems fun

Are there screencaps?

How much are they paying you to shitpost on Sup Forums?

Dah Phuc?
No one in their right mind thinks open world Zelda will fail. It's literally Zelda.

yes, everybody talks in real life exactly liek they shitpost on vietnamese pictograph forums
you've figured it out

The reason why people hate this game is because it's an everyman game, it isn't filling a niche like Yakuza nor is trying to be a skill based game like Nioh or Souls. It's the type of game where you can sit back, let your hair down, explore a beautiful world for 40+ hours and still have some action robot hunting style gameplay that isn't as simplistic as Zelda but satifies enough for a fun gaming session.

It's really a standard AAA game with some interesting frills but the thing is Sup Forums secretly loves these types of AAA games, PC users have been trying to justify their $600 cards with them for the last 7 years and their favourite game is Witcher 3 which is literally a 100+ hour cinematic fetch and trail quest simulator. Aside from the SJW shit that is obviously in Horizon, Sup Forums has decided to hate this particular AAA game despite liking them simply because it's on console and getting great reviews.

You'll find a lot of insecure poorfags and Sup Forumstards in these threads who think they are sticking to the big SJW overlords by shitting on it. They are also desperate to justify their gaming habits and platforms and seek validation for shitting on this game because it's an easy target. A lot of PC, Xbox, Nintendo and autistic Japanese-game-only Sony fanboys have basically banded together and decided this is the game that they want to fail because it looks fun and they can't stand the idea of enjoying themselves because they are insecure and think this devalues them as a gamer so they try fit in with the 'in-crowd'.

The truth is most of the people in these threads have low standards for games, they will play games that literally contradict every single thing they say in these threads in their private time but simply come on here to be memetastic hypocritical contrarians and spew hate. I for one am not allergic to having fun nor do I feel the need to adhere to social norms or popular opinions, once I beat Nioh I'll be enjoying this game while retards stay assmad

No unlike you I'm not a retarded manchild who wants games to flop just to fuel my shitposting fuel and act like a game from platform x flopping will somehow justify my purchase of platform y.

Zelda will no doubt be good, and I would like to play it someday but I won't for a while because I don't have a Wii U and don't plan to get a switch for a while. The only real problem with Zelda for me is just been there, done that so I don't feel the need to play it in a hurry. I just posted that pic because I thought it was funny

>>IT'S GONNA FLOP
at best
Show me where Sup Forums said this.

All of those other greentext lines are actually true.

This kills the Horizon shill
embed.azubu.tv/horizonbrops4/video492157SVHorizonBroPS4

another shitty open world game with crafting that was hyped only because its not a multiplat and because sonyggers need to be convinced by shill journalists how every game for their console is a masterpiece.

>Americlaps don't use the word mediocre

I'm glad this has already become a copypasta

mediocre entered the lexicon to a higher degree with Fury Road

save us, crowbcat. show the entire world how shit the game really is.

>implying he gets paid for his "work"

How many of those who hate the game own PS4?

And if they don't own PS4, why do they care about it so much?

I'm not even getting the game early and I haven't played much zelda

me

>H-help us e-celeb, we NEED you to prove us right

Sup Forums is stooping to new lows by the day

Don't worry, you can ask the guy from Sup Forums who likes to rip off crowbcat, I'm sure he would be up for it

Think Anthony Burch watched as his moaned while she was pounded in the recording studio for a more realistic sfx?

this happens all the time

I actually expected the Metacritic score to be higher, 94% or some shit. I honestly don't know much about the game, it could actually be good for all I know. It's pretty low on my list of games to check out. I still plan on getting Yakuza 0 and Nioh after I finish BotW so maybe I'll give it a shot after.

So what happens when the reviews comes out for Zelda :BotW?

Clearly you've all made your point that reviews are paid for and that its an indication that the Horizon Zero Dawn is actually shit. So what will your consensus be when Zelda also gets good reviews? Will you also call out "paid reviews!" or will good reviews suddenly count now that it's affiliated with Nintendo.

If you're going to suddenly praise the good reviews for Zelda from the same people who reviewed Horizon; then wont that mean that Horizon was in fact good as well?

What if Zelda gets bad reviews? Will you then say that reviews dont count or they are a true reflection of the actual game?

By Sup Forums's collective logic whether Zelda get's good or bad reviews; it will be shit regardless.

- an idort who wont be buying neither

well, looks like the game is pushing a shitty agenda.

to the garbage with this one!

Zelda will probably be a flat 90 or 91 and no one will be shitposting about it besides the mad autists these threads bait

You know what the deal is

High scores for games I don't like = Paid for
High scores for games I do like = Legit

Low scores for games I don't like = [Insert publisher/studio] fans on suicide watch
Low scores for games I do like = Journalists have an agenda towards my favorite company and video game journalism is a joke

I don't know, these scores don't really match all the stealth and combat videos I have seen so far. Could it be that they are scoring it based on something else?

Well, seeing as how the gameplay actually looks good in Zelda while it looked like buggy shit in Horizon, I'll judge the game based on that and not the opinions of games "journalists"

Of course it won't, only people that wanted very badly to have another exclusive and sjws ever gave a shit about this game.
All the reviews that have come out pretty much tell you how familiar and a mish mash of all the current popular games it is, in other words it's nothing unique or memorable but has a strong presentation.
People don't remember those type of games.

literally the only white males in the game are bad guys

With Nintendo's history of being so secretive and an asshole to the majority of the industry I'm really not sure. I'm sure they pay for reviews somehow but I also think that most reviewers are just pressured by Nintendo's legacy itself.

It is also important to not take Sup Forums seriously at all. Form your own opinions from game play videos.

>8.8

It's like the maymays write themselves.

When Zelda gets good reviews, then it means it's a good game.

Here's 3 things that Zelda doesn't do:
>push an agenda
>try to be more of a movie than a game
>skimp on gameplay

Good reviews of Horizon all around have talked about Aloy's character, her world, how inspiring she is, or how you can put your phone down in combat. Meanwhile, the reviews that concentrated on what a game should have been primarily graded for in the first place: gameplay, are disillusioned with it.

Meanwhile there's hours upon hours of non-railroaded Zelda gameplay out in the internet. Sup Forums knows what it's getting. And Sup Forums loves it. That's why there's less doubt about paid reviews for that game than Horizon.

I'd like to believe Sup Forums hasn't sold out to Sonywood yet with their cinematic experiences.

And it shows. Horizon is not a shitty ass game, but it doesn't deserve the highest praise it's currently getting. Reeks of paid reviews.

>Opens the map every 5 seconds

>thinking I'm a nintoddler

Sup Forums likes to grind stuff to the ground.

It was expected to be good, the entire game was about the usual "casual stuff people like nowadays with shiny graphics".

After the success of Uncharted / Last of Us etc and the fail of their shooter and to some extent racing games Sony noticed their developers are pretty good in the casual action adventure feels department. Literally every game they develop is similar to this. What you need to understand:

>TPS is in
>hand holding is in
>sandbox is in to some extent (needs handholding)
>people wan't new IPs wit their yearly Activison- Ubisoft- EA shit even if it is the same ona different plate
>feels (about muh family) is in
>shiny graphics is a must have and worth more than every other aspect IF those aren't completly disregarded (like in the Order)
>it doesn't matter if the gameplay is boring or tedious until it has good main missions, casuals never play anything but the main storyline anyway ON EASY ONCE >implying they finish it not watching the end on youtube

Nowadays making an Uncharted like or an Assassins Creed like game in some popular setting watching it has SJW balancing and a mediocre gameplay with great graphics is enough for a 9/10 in every popular media.

Ubisoft could own this scene but they regulary have problems with the setting and the quality of the product, mostly because they are multiplat.

Not really.

Someone post the boss getting stabbed WEBM

If BOTW is also an 8.8, will the fabric of reality rip apart?

>Form your own opinions from game play videos.
Good thing Horizonbro went and played live on stream.

Honestly I expected 90 on metacritic and everyone give it 10/10 so they can make one of those ugly boxarts that feature scores