what was the point of the PS4 pro again?
What was the point of the PS4 pro again?
Other urls found in this thread:
Double the gpu but not the cpu
>what was the point of the PS4 pro again?
For you to buy a PS4 twice
Are you jealous, nintendrone?
> 4K
> stable 60 FPS for all games in near future
> most powerful console ever made
why would you lie on the internet? of all places
I can't imagine he mindset of anyone who would outright buy a new PS4 pro and retain the old one, as opposed to trade it in and pay the nominal amount extra to get the pro. Cheaper upgrade than any worthwhile upgrade on PC.
Specify where I've lied......
technically microsoft is the one currently claiming theyre going to put out the most powerful console ever made with the scorpio or whatever its called now
I unironically was looking to buy one but they're sold out everywhere here (UK)
To test sonyggers if they are dumb enough to buy the same console twice.
And it worked.
Marketing mostly I assume
So far don't most games fare worse on it overall? Even with boosts?
I saw something about FF15 having more problems despite slightly higher FPS
>scoprio
wont be released for another 6-8 months
meanwhile PSPro came out months ago
future doesnt mean shit
It's not out. PS4 pro is the most powerful console ever released.
See
you can now play ff15 at 40 fps instead of 30
>4theplayers
>4k
>stable 60 fps
>sonyggers
please don't use that word, it may offend some posters
not
>28 instead of 30
trade ins don't matter to sony, only to the store who will then sell that console as used at a discount.
The pro plays games at 4K - horizon being a glittering example.
You've edited my post re: 60 fps.
Ehh, I already beat it, had my fun with it. I'll do the DLC packs in the future when they go on a sale.
Saved myself $400 by not getting a PS4 Pro
#4theplayers
> stable 60 FPS for all games in near future
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA
wtf even pcucks get more fps per upgrade
its over............. sony is finished..................
The post was:
'To test if sonyggers will buy the same console twice'.
As a consumer, we wouldn't, we'd trade in and get an upgrade, if we so desired. There are benefits in upgrading, but it's not necessary if you're happy with the normal PS4. Either way, you still get to play all the exclusives.
>4k
1080p upscaled into checkerboard """4k"""
>stable 60
more like stable 29 FPS
There are games now that play at stable 60 fps on the pro. PC gamers spend a lot of time and effort to try and ensure they get a STABLE 60 fps. It's new technology, so games that were in development didn't have the technology in mind. Now that they do, you can expect to see new releases making the most of the technology available.
The correct answer. I just bought a PC instead.
It's not upscaled. You don't even know what checkerboard rendering means so it's better to stop posting.
To make r*tards like me consider giving Sony extra money by trading-up to a Pro
>The pro plays games at 4K
Checkerboard "4K" =/= 4K. It looks noticeably worse.
>You've edited my post re: 60 fps
It doesn't really count if it hits 60 fps for 4 seconds during the entire game
the rehash console does sell though, and it sells to people who paid $400 for a PS4. the fact that they traded in their older console is irrelevant to sony, who made a product oriented at people who would already own a PS4 and had commercial success with it.
>There are games now that play at stable 60 fps on the pro
Name one
>It's not upscaled
this faggot doesnt even know
sell more defective ps4 units.
If you think doing it would make you a retard, then don't trade in and pay for the upgrade and just keep the console you initially bought.
It's upscaled from 1527p
wtf are you guys talking about? the PS4 Pro™ plays ffxv 60fps perfectly
Daily reminder
Less than 0,2% of people play in native 4K on steam
do you realize not even 1% of all people here on Sup Forums actually own a 4K monitor?
>lite mode
you also gonna show a 4k screenshot in screenshot mode?
>PC gamers spend a lot of time and effort to try and ensure they get a STABLE 120 fps.
fixed that for you
it wouldn't be mustard race if the consoles didn't have anything to ketchup to
>It looks noticeably worse.
Digital Foundry couldn't tell a difference.
COULDN'T TELL A DIFFERENCE
>stable 60 fps
yeah
stable 60FPS at 160 x 90
>not being 150fps 90p masterrace
>PS4 library has non matching spines
I'd rather eat shit
someone post that PS4 BF1 screenshot, you know the one
>COULDN'T TELL A DIFFERENCE
Easy there. Put the gun down...
>Wrong
>Wrong again
>Right if only because of its pathetic competition
>his monitor contains more than 1000 pixels
hello sony.
this one?
would you also like the misterblurryface one?
...
Those were all just specific screen shots from comparisons but it does perform better across the board. Though mot enough to warrant a purchase id say. The CPU limitation was a mistake as that is what was really needed.
>moving goalposts
thanks for proving me right
I own a PS4 Slim, faggot.
>actually right, and more and more games are supporting native 4k each day
>ALL games is hyperbole but most is more likely especially with the boost mode
>still right for the time being unless we count steamboxes as consoles for some reason.
>moving goalposts
yeah user moved them closer and the ps4 still couldnt reach them
That's tablet mode right? No way it's that underpowered when docked.
Switching from tablet mode to docked mode shouldn't change the graphical settings, it will be an fps boost at best.
>he can run indy arcade and last-gen titles at 60 fps
>playstation
>black
words cant describe how hard im laughing right now.
Wow, PS4 owners are black. Nobody saw it coming.
>bbc popular for ps4
>Playstation
>Mom
>Black
>Gangbang
>BBC4theplayers wives
>Implying upscaled 4K = native 4K
>Implying there's any proof of that whatsoever especially given the pathetic performance "gains" seen in available games
>Implying that boost mode isn't a paltry half step at best
>lesbian strap on
I may not like your console, but I applaud your taste, Xbros
To separate your money from you
>xboners have the best tastes
Huh
4K tvs are becoming a norm. Sony gets to sell the same console twice and possibly more tvs as well.
It's simple as fuck really, there's nothing more to it than that.
The Pro should have had DisplayPort and FreeSync. 40-50fps would have been enough, then.
>xboners
please don't use that word, it may offend some posters
>pay $100 more
>it's worse
FOR THE PLAYERS KEK
It was supposed to let me play Bloodborne at 60 but I guess it's fair to 30fps fags.
No it's not ffs. It's rendered at 4K but with part of the info filled in by an algorithm that pulls it from a previous frame. It's not the same as upscaling. Upscaling stretches pixels out, checkerboard rendering does not.
Imagine being so poor and mad that you can't afford a PC that you have to type such stupid shit on an internet imageboard.
So that's 99% of Sup Forums. Bunch of poorfags that shit on playstation while they can't even run moba shit at 60 fps.
i can't imagine that bro
>Horizon next week
>Nier the week after that
>Persona 5 a month after
I-it's over bros....Sony won..I can't take this anymore my heart is literally beating
>4K
>60fps
It stopped being able to guarantee at least one of those features, and the console is not even 3 months old yet.
Next year we can look forward to PS4 Pro at 30fps and 900p.
To scam their retarded fanbase.
>4K
stopped reading there
...
>PC gamers spend a lot of time and effort to try and ensure they get a STABLE 60 fps
90-144 here
The actual reason was to compete with the Nintendo NX.
If Sony and Microsoft allowed Nintendo to start a new generation on it's own, Nintendo would get a huge advantage from the fact that its console would have technology years ahead of its competitors and the console audience would be really for something new. If Nintendo released the most powerful console ever it could really screw over Sony and Microsoft, so they needed to do something to compete.
Of course, Nintendo decided to release $290 HDMI port and a $10 tablet, so it was a bit redundant.
Nintendo has always put underpowered hardware for more than ten years, there's no reason Sony would think Nintendo would start now. They just wanted free money riding on 4k and VR memes. Turns out consumers aren't as stupid as they thought.
>sell old videocard. R9 390 goes for 200
>pay the difference to get a 400 dollar videocard
>skip paid online
A pro "upgrade" can't compete
>stable 60 fps
Stop it
I was going to purchase a ps4 but I held back because I wanted to see how ps4 pro was going to be, but it looks like the latter is just not worth it, I'm never going to buy a 4k TV anyway and I see no real advantage in getting a pro.
>stable 60fps
Even I know it's bullshit and I'm willing to buy it. The only ps4 game worth having right now Bloodborne isn't getting 60fps because "muh multiplayer experience", that's already a big red flag.
>PC gamers spend a lot of time and effort to try and ensure they get a STABLE 60 fps
nigger, my i5 3550 + r9 380 4g setup can handle almost every game at 60fps in FHD, if I setup the graphics as it is on ps4 pro. Just shut the fuck up.
>60 fps on 2010 games
FTFY
>see the new beta of the os has "boost mode"
>apply to be a beta tester
>excepted :^)
>find a ps4 pro for 280 usd
>buy it
>download the update
>try boost mode on bloodborne, looks great
>sell ps4 to a guy giving it to his nephew for 170 USD :^)
The only thing i regret is that the ps4pro has motion blur on 2B
>The only thing i regret is that the ps4pro has motion blur on 2B
Can't you just deactivate it?
Is that a time of day thing or is Wii U going to be the definitive version now?
No.
I hope so
Nier
wooow
Well, good thing is I actually like motion blur
kek you're fucked if the guy above you is right
to make sonys vr bearable
The only way to make PS4 run games at 60 fps is to make a hardware solution that shocks the art director on the balls every time the game runs under 60.
Otherwise no matter how powerful the system is, the game will run under 30 because he will want to add 10 more piss filters and lens flares.
Actually, PC only get to run things at 60 fps because it is not the primary target and low end PCs are a thing.
If someday you get this standardized high end PC that 30+ million people have, you can bet you bottom dollar it will run games at 30 fps as well.
Also 60fps on base PS4 at a slightly lower resolution, so not really that impressive.