French website jeuxvideo.com, that is totally not Nintendo fanboy, is about to give Zelda: Breath of the Wild a 20/20...

French website jeuxvideo.com, that is totally not Nintendo fanboy, is about to give Zelda: Breath of the Wild a 20/20, last time they gave a game that score was 14 years ago, guess what game was that.

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/JVCom/status/836531415739162625
twitter.com/SquareEnixFR/status/836537615390228480/photo/1
gamekult.com/jeux/test-persona-5-SU3050329891t.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

I dont get the boner for Zelda games

There are games with better exploration
There are games with better puzzles
There are games with better combat
There are games with better stories

Literally what does this shitty ass franchise have that every new main game is 10/5 GOTY X10 even when its fucking garbage like SS

there aren't games with a better combination of all of those, though.

>Zelda game gets bloated review scores

Who new? literally skyward sword all over again

It's the balance it keeps between all of those. Its not easy to keep, and only game that has copied this successfully was okami.

>jeux video
>jeux - jew
Jew video
Like pottery barn.

They only gave Skyward Sword a 17.5, but that doesn't matter of course.

but do any of those games have a trap protagonist?

Skyward Sword was legit a bad game tho

>trusting a jeuxvideo.com
Kek. May as well wait for Kotaku's review while at it.

Malaise = cringe

Famitsu gave the game a 40/40 though.
I think they're a much more reputable reviewer than Jewvideo

reminder that Franck did nothing wrong

Souls did it better.

Guys, the thing about the French is that they're never satisfied. I've been studying French for the past 4 years and they can find the faults in anything. The greatest pastry chefs will make a beautiful cake that could make an American cry, take a bite, and say it's too dry.

Most school assignments are based on a 20 point scale, too. But teachers absolutely never give out nineteens or twenties. They're , or "reserved for the gods." This is a culturally significant thing to give in all honestly. I guess the question is if the French have good taste in video games.

>using google translation
I'm doing an actual translation of the meaning of what he's saying. He's clearly saying he find that game "problematic".

THIS.

No game does it ALL better AT ONCE.

Nintendo won.
It's over, cucklets.

>Famitsu
>reputable

In what way? They give shitty games high scores because said shitty games are HYPE!!!1!

No because they're faggots

jeux as in the plural noun form of jouer, or "to play"

just like the Jews play us all.

idk man I just browse Sup Forums and shitpost every now and then about games I've never played, why would I know anything about nip mags
I don't even like video games

NOOOO FUCKING DELETE THIS!!!!!
REVIEWS ONLY MATTER WHEN THEY PRAISE SONY
NINTENPOOPS SHILLS FUCK OFFFFFFF

>Eurogamer gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>IGN gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>Polygon gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>Gamespot gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>NYtimes gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>The Guardian gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>Jeuxvideo gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>Famitsu gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>Destructoid gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>Giantbomb gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>The Verge gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]
>USgamer gives BotW a 10/10
>That one doesn't count, they are [sjw/cucked/shills/fanboys/idiots/irrelevant]

What did Sup Forums mean by this?

Pic related is the stance they take when everyone else disagrees with them

How do you know they'll give it that score?

Sacrebleu!

twitter.com/JVCom/status/836531415739162625

this

nique ta mère

C'est ton pere le faggot

>souls
>better comabt

>new

c'est toi le tas de bois enculé

je suis complètement d'accord

NINTENDO ACTUALLY FUCKING DID IT HOLY SHIT....

>trusting bing translation

kek

BING BING *1UP* WAHOOOOOOO YIPEE YIPEE OOOOOF

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

It's not even an especially combination of those elements though (talking more about the 3D gameplay Zeldas here) No one ever talks about the combat in Zelda for a reason. The puzzles are barely even puzzles and simplistic ones are just dropped into recent games out of a mandatory need to say that the game has puzzles.

Not especially trying to hate on Zelda but I think it's a consistenly "decent" series that's regarded as great for no particular reason at this point. If Onimusha 1/2/3 were exactly the same gameplay-wise but had Zelda labels slapped over them they'd probably be regarded as some of the best games in the franchise. Zelda's like Resident Evil, tons of the appeal seemingly comes from the brand alone regardless of whether the games are good or not.

>is about to give Zelda: Breath of the Wild a 20/20
source?

...

ta mere la pute

damn

14 years ago the review of Zelda were made by Romendil. She left, the reviewer is another one.

Wooooooo putain mais merci pour la barre de rire, ça va me faire au moins la semaine

The reviewer of breath of the wild gave final fantasy 15 the score of 18/20
Talk about credibility now

But are any of these games made by nintendo? No? Then it doesn't count

But most of them are shills and should never review anything with a marketing budget that go beyond a bit of shilling on social media and a stand in a game show.

kek
Every sane french people know jvc ratings mean shit.

Les tests de valoche était peut être agréable à lire, mais purée la surnotation qu'elle avait

>Wind Waker

So this site is completely irrelevant, then. I mean, rating 20/20 to that fucking turd pile? They must mean nothing.

It's like the miata, it does nothing exceptionally well but everything else fails spectacularly in one way or another trying to jump over the incredibly low bar it sets.

Souls doesn't have puzzles though, unless you count unlocking a shortcut in a path a puzzle.

>No one ever talks about the combat in Zelda for a reason.
Because it doesn't need to be highly in depth, though Breath of the Wild opens up the combat possibilities enough to make it a discussion.

t. Someone who's been playing the game for hours on end.

>Souls
>puzzles
>story
>implying

Anyone who believes Souls has either of these are delusional.

Even the exploration is largely based around shitty hints and and forced difficulty(such as no mini-map), but still good just not as good as Zelda.

>what game was that

...

>mini-map
Why would you even need one? For the most part areas are rather linear, with the odd exception for shortcuts that lead you to other areas.

And there is a story, it's just obfuscated and never focused on to a great degree. Beyond your character's function, you're left to discover what happened and why by yourself.

>Wind Wanker
>10/10

lol

Omelette du fromage!

Yes but no anyway. Perhaps you're right but jeuxvideo.com is the first european video game website and in the Top 30 of french website, also the second or third in the world after Gamespot.com. 95% of french people in Sup Forums come from jeuxvideo.com. And I think the owner bought IGN or he is partner, something like thing that.
The point is that jeuxvideo.com has the weight in the game and their reviews matter for average people in France.
That's why Square Enix France responded to the 20/20 to talk about NIER, see pic. Marketing thing

twitter.com/SquareEnixFR/status/836537615390228480/photo/1

OOOHHH MY GAWWWWWD

HOW DOES NINTY DO IT???

sale pute d'anglais

French swinger clubs.

Haha bien joué de la part de square

Giving number/number ratings for any media is one of the worst inventions ever

all this is telling me is that Nintendo is paying extra for these reviews

Gamekult is the only good French website for reviews.

Here some games with +85 on MC

Horizon: 7/10
Final fantasy XV: 6/10
Resident Evil: 7/10
MGS V: 7/10
Titanfall 2: 5/10
Fallout 4: 6/10
Rise of the tomb raider: 6/10
Zelda skyward sword: 8/10
GTA IV 8/10
Overwatch 7/10
Uncharted 4: 8/10
Doom: 7/10

MDRRR

Soit gentil avec Romendil plz c'etait l'atout féminin de JVC.

En plus elle au moins n'aurait jamais donné un 18/20 à FFXV

still too generous

I'm looking for a review site that actually has the balls to give triple A games below 6/10 or even 5/10

Surtout comment elle a gerbé dessus

Which games had 9 and 10?

Based Square
Fuck you for deus ex tho

Non, l'atout féminin c'était Lena

>Titanfall 2: 5/10
>shitward sword: 8/10

>Uncharted 4: 8/10
>Titanfall 2: 5/10

I liked both of these games, but I don't see how Titanfall 2 is that much worse than UC4.

They never gave a 10.

For the 9/10: The Witcher 3, Bayonetta 2, GTA V, GTA San Andreas, GTA Vice City, Bioshock, Oblivion, God of War 3, Uncharted 2, The last of us, Dark Souls, Mario Galaxy, Zelda TP, Zelda oot...

>Uncharted 2
>Bioshock
>Oblivion
>The Witcher 3
>Zelda TP
embarrassing

they also sound like AAA plebs and don't play Japanese games if it isn't Mario or Zelda

2 reviewers really like Japanese games, they even speak Japanese

Persona 5: 9/10 (Best rated game in 2016)
gamekult.com/jeux/test-persona-5-SU3050329891t.html

>nothing is good!
wow sounds like Sup Forums

maybe in their rating scale, 5/10 is actually average instead of the equivalent to 2/10 in other journalist's inflated scales.

...

Who was the tester? Romendil?
If yes, then count the note as fanboyism.
Otherwise, it's legit (bloated or not, I mean that it's more "neutral" in a non-fanboyism way)