Daily reminder that anything bellow 90 on Metacritic is trash

Daily reminder that anything bellow 90 on Metacritic is trash.

>boring storytelling
>boring atmosphere
>boring graphics
>boring sound
>boring combat

...

...

Fallout NV is the last good video game. Prove me wrong. Everything after 2010 is trash.

That's not what the critics say.

...

Yes they do.

Critics didn't get trips though

...

OP BTFO'd to no end.

...

haha OP got trolled epicly!

>anything bellow 90 on Metacritic is trash.

Well clearly this is false.

...

>Metacritic is trash.
ftfy

Daily reminder that Metacritic scores don't matter and the newfags from 2017 need to stop bringing them up

And everything 90 or above is a paid review.

mw2 was cod kino

none of them will ever be as good as that game with the exception of the one before it

I might give you that. NV is better though.

Ironically being a faggot is still being a faggot.

Modern Warfare was the only one justified for 90+

Other two were easily mid 80s material.

Genuinely go fuck yourself, you impatient, miserable faggot.

Remaster of both games when

You got owned ahahhaha

...

Daily reminder that scores lost all meaning a long time ago.

Never, I hope.

Look at all the other "remastered" games released this decade. Max Payne Remastered would just be Max Payne with slightly better textures in some places and lots of bugs that they'll never fix. They'd probably lower the difficulty as well.

They really don't, they just make excellent shitposting fodder

That game was broken at launch, it kept crashing after a certain point

I meant to type remake but I went full retard. Max Payne 3 shooting mechanics are good. I think Rockstar would deliver a good MP/MP2 remake

>new vegas cucks in denial

Fallout 3 was better

...

>critics have shit taste
>a good portion of the user reviews are just shitposting or assblasted fags

Who do we trust?

>Who do we trust?
Sup Forums obiviously

>Who do we trust?
Sup Forums, you can always trust us user

>Fallout 4 got the same rating as new vegas
Obsidian didn't deserve this

Sup Forums is your only hope

...

...

nice reddit meme argument friendo

What's the problem

How do I separate the truth from the shitposting?

niceme.me

I unironically trust Sup Forums more than games writers

Bethesda promised Obsidian a bonus if they got a 85 metacritic score. They proceeded to pay metacritic to make the score lower then 85 to not have to pay them.

It's a narrative abortion that insults its playerbase and is filled with rushed corner cutting gameplay and art assets. In includes on disc DLC in a pathetically cynical attempt to gouge players by withholding content. It's also a singleplayer story-driven RPG that gates results behind forced multiplayer elements, which is a weirdly anti-consumer decision.

And the ending was so poorly delivered that people were demanding refunds en masse and the developers had to release a partial fix just to gloss over how badly they fucked up.

It's a 7/10 that gets bumped to an 8/10 at best due to its surprisingly good multiplayer.

>daily reminder that metacritic is trash

there's already a thread faggot

stop shitting up the board with FNV

But metacritic is just an aggregator.

Does Nier have a chance to be above 90+ again?

I know, but even if that weren't the case it's insulting that Fallout 4 even got that high of a rating

They can aggregate scores from wherever they please though. That's third party candidates are kept out of US presidential debates, biased selections.

Yeah? They paid for the aggregated number to be under 85.

probably