Why is this allowed?

Why is this allowed?

youtube.com/watch?v=aVPXKdSEGNQ&t=319s
youtube.com/watch?v=qEGWtyJAkO0

BUT IT IS ZELDA!
HD RUMBLE
ON THE GO
EXCLUSIVE INDIES

Zelda is much better game from this comparison, but Horizon has better graphics.

Zelda is probably the best Open World, but both is pretty shit.

Thanks for the daily reminder that BOTW is a tech demo. Impressive, but it's as fulfilling as Crysis meaning not at all.

now compare the actual combat

>now compare the actual combat
Zelda still a better game

when the fuck will this industry realize that animations + attention to details renders a game's world way more immersive and believable than just spending tons on MUH GRAPHICS and building a world that looks good but it's basically dead in terms of possible interactions.

Holy shit its an art style, do none of you know what cel shading is?

>Holy shit its an art style, do none of you know what cel shading is?
NOONE IS TALKING ABOUT ART STYLE

What details does Horizon have that Zelda doesn't? I'm sure there's something.

G R A P H I C S

>This wasn´t the definitive design
Feminists and numales were a mistake

>playing video games for graphics
Why don't you just go outside

if you actually counted the lines of code, Zelda would realistically have probably triple the amount

HZD has better combat.

>Not watching the videos

One of them is fun to play
The other one almost kinda looks like real life

Whichever you prefer is up to you

>The other one almost kinda looks like real life
Which one? Both look cartoony

Loads more of story, voice acting and cutscenes.
The shit that modern critics and the casual-core audiencie love way more over proper gameplay. And I think Zelda would be a better game with more of this storytelling shit.

What are you talking about, zelda looks nothing like real life.

They changed it because the sculpt was a nightmare to work with in mocap

Aloy is cute! CUTE!

1. graphics (no contest)
2. combat (more strategy)
3. story (way deeper then muh ganon)
4. better side quests
5. enemies are more complex
6. condensed open world instead of bigger for the sake of being big
7. stable 30 fps
8. more then 14 enemy types
9. better dungeons (cauldrons)
10. no puzzles

source: my ass

>1. graphics (no contest)
OK
>2. combat (more strategy)
kek nope, never ever
>3. story (way deeper then muh ganon)
but muh feminism saves the world is ok
>4. better side quests
nope, really this not
>5. enemies are more complex
never ever
>6. condensed open world instead of bigger for the sake of being big
the open world is bettern in Zelda
>7. stable 30 fps
also on handled switch is stable, or in TV mode at 720p
>8. more then 14 enemy types
>9. better dungeons (cauldrons)
NEVER EVER
>10. no puzzles

So this....is the power.....of brainwashing....WOW
Still no containment board for drones, what a shame.

Comparing two different games with different art-styles running on hardware with varying capabilities and aiming for differing levels of realism, then imposing why this is 'allowed', like it's 1984-lite?

Sounds like veeee.

Please remove.