EVERY SINGLE MAIN RELEASE GRAND THEFT AUTO (GTA) GAME IS AN AMAZING MASTERPIECE. THE ENTIRE SERIES WAS GROUNDBREAKING AT EVERY STAGE, AND PICKING WHICH ONE IS BEST IS LIKE CHOOSING WHICH SUPERMODEL YOU WANT TO FUCK THE MOST.
GTA IS THE GREATEST GAME SERIES OF ALL TIME, AND ANYONE WHO DISAGREES IS A STRAIGHT BUSTA
Yeah but it's all the same gameplay. It's like the different Final Fantasies, man. No big innovation really.
Except for all the massive technical innovation every time. GTAV has great gameplay as well honestly.
CAPSLOCK, YOU CUNT?
That's because the gore gameplay model works; so many companies have tried to copy it for a reason. Also, it's not like there aren't new features added with every release, and a lot of the appeal comes from being able to explore a new map with new characters and new music each time a new GTA game comes out.
I've played GTA III, GTA IV, GTA V, and GTA SA all within the past week, and I had a great time in each.
>GTAV has great gameplay as well honestly
except the driving is shit and other than that it's virtually the same as GTAIV.
rockstar always delivers on the tech front but their games are just rehash after rehash. they don't know much about intuitive design. their shitty 'tutorials' have been the same since GTAIII across pretty much all their games.
fun games, but masterpieces? nah. a masterpiece would excel in every department.
Eh, I still think SA is the best. Its not for some retarded meme reason like nostalgia, I just really loved the rpg elements, all the different cities,forests, the mountain, all that good stuff. Also, I really liked the story and missions. 4 and 5 really bummed me when they took out the rpg elements. Yeah, in GTA 5 you can get better at driving and shooting but you are already good enough to never miss and you already steer insanely well. Not too mention the 250 collectibles in GTA SA. idk anons i probably just have shit taste but i really liked the feeling of starting off as garbage in gta sa and eventually becoming nearly unkillable desu
V has a better map and IV has a better atmosphere
But I don't like supermodels, I like cute, homely girls.
>cute
>homely
pick one
I'm talking about British definition of homely, not American.
>British definition of homely
Oh you mean ugly
>the British definition of homely
If pic related is the British definition of attractive, then I don't want to see what the British definition of homely looks like.
maisie is a 10/10 goddess you plonker
Nah, my dude. Unless you're calling British girls ugly, in which case I agree, all Western European girls are.
...
The difference is, nobody in America would find those women attractive outside of extremely fringe fetishists and people with literally 0 other prospects. In the UK, your gene pool is so utterly destroyed by countless generations of inbreeding as a result of being an island nation with an insular culture despite extensive colonial efforts throughout your history, that women who would be considered 5/10 on a good night(last call at the bar and you're shitfaced drunk) in America are treated as stunningly beautiful products of God himself.
>western european girls are ugly
Irish, and French girls are fucking amazing. Just because you feel lonely that you're the only ugly european country doesn't mean you have to bring others down with you.
I am Irish, and you have no idea what you're talking about. I've only been to France once and they seemed alright looking.
>UK
>inbreeding
>the very name United Kingdom implies that the place is a unity of more than one country
american """"education""""
There's only so much genetic variation on one island.