>calls out shady practices like On-disc DLC, and day one DLC
>Exposes anti-consumer games
>Destroyed Star Wars Battlefront
>Destroyed Street Fighter V
>Destroyed Mass Effect Andromeda
>Gave BotW a fair review
How can one reviewer be so based? He's really the only one I trust anymore.
Does Sup Forums approve?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
who?
This is...advanced shilling
Enraged Enrique.
Why is this?
But he's right though, and if I am not mistaken, his reviews are entertaining if nothing else, Other Joe is great too.
Seven Banana Joe
Seven Dollar Salvador
Ok lets forgo your previous points
>His reviews are entertaining if nothing else
No.
His comedic timing is worse than my 3 year old nephew.
Watch his breath of the wild review. Tell me how long that FIRST joke is, and then tell me how long it should've been.
That's not entertaining.
Also, ever since he started jerking off twitch, he's included unfunny stream highlights into his reviews since he's obviously not capturing raw footage.
Does he still do shit with the Nostalgia Critic?
He only attacks games and certain business practices because he's not paid to defend them.
Did he like yakuza 0? I watched the first like three minutes of his review but couldn't take the cringe
>He hates Nintendo
based af senpai
Do you really think Seven Dollars can afford actual shills? Stop trying to fit in, fuck off back to Plebbit.
His skits are the definition of hit-or-miss.
whats wrong with on disk dlc?
Real talk, how did he get popular? He's pure cringe and 0 insight, he just screams or repeats common knowledge.
Four-Fingered Fillipe
Yeah but who else on youtube or elsewhere puts the amount of effort he does into game review videos? I think he's entertaining.
i prefer acg
Joseph Anderson is 10x better for actual reviews
I always laugh when the skinnier mexican dude dresses up like a girl in their skits
I don't know. I can't stand his videos due to all the little skits. It's pretty obvious the dude wants to be an actor first, especially since he is a year or two older than me, and his first console was the 360, and he didn't game on PC before that.
He also apparently bitches his fans out on twitter all the time, complaining that they aren't happy with his release schedule, as if it's a chore for him to play vidya.
His skits are cringeworthy. They literally keep me from watching his shit regularly. What should be a 5 minute review turns into a 10-15 minute review due to his twitch reactions and his cringeworthy skits.
But does Mr Anderson do skits n shit? I like the skits.
>so desperate for anything to watch on youtube, he watches this fat retard
>has to spam his fat face in here every day out of crippling OCD
>has never stopped to think if he's actually worth watching
Go super fuck yourself, garbage boy.
>Gave BotW a fair review
lmao
He was sucking BoTW's dick harder than two whores on crack
The skits are literally the worst part. I don't understand how anyone who is old enough to post here could find them enjoyable.
At least back in his prime, the skits that Spoony did were actually relevant to the review, like how he dressed up like Dr. Insano and talked about how hard he had to work to get the Jaguar CD Drive to work.
>Gave BotW a fair review
Honestly, his review was kinda silly. The only real problem he has with the game is his inexperience with japanese games and their philosophy.
He hated the weapon durability
what he say about andromeda?
Way to corny
Opinion discarded
Only Skyrim-liking casuals dislike the weapon durability because "muh hoard, muh emotional attachment to a bunch of pixels"
The dude really isn't qualified to do reviews on Japanese games. Again, his first console was the 360. He never even purchased a Wii, meaning his first real forray into Jap games was the PS4 and the Wii U (which he refused to play because of Nintendo's rules on youtube).
You would be your gay
Isn't this the guy who said MGSV was the best stealth game ever when he had never played a stealth game before?
Raging Rodriguez
HOWEVER.
Angry Joe? Nah. He's not corny. He's just bad. I feel the same way watching his stuff as I do watching the Office, but the Office had INTENTIONAL cringe. Joe is just unintentionally cringey.
>supposedly against shady DLC practices
>fully endorses Nintendo cutting out hard mode and selling it at 20 dollars, IN ADDITION TO the amiibo DLC.
...
Fierce Felipe
>puts effort
Going on amazon and buying a shitty bunch of costumes, and "acting" in front of a green screen isn't effort.
If he was commissioning, or building his own constumes, fine. If his skits were funny, or with great timing? Fine. The issue is he puts "effort" into buying costumes and shit, so he needs to get his moneys worth. This destroys his comedic timing.
also
>30+ minute "reviews"
A review should be 10-15 Maximum. Those are hard limits. After that you're just wasting the viewers time by not cutting the fat, and providing necessary information.
Angry Joe didn't get into gaming until at least 2005, and he started with the 360. He's a literal dudebro who just does funny skits for children.
BUT BUT He's a spic user durrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
typical retard logic
>I don't understand how anyone who is old enough to post here could find them enjoyable
I guess I enjoy them because nobody else does them for reviews, if someone did them better then maybe I would see what you guys see, but as of right now nobody else does this and normal reviews are boring.
People keep claiming this but they never provide a source. Whereas he has stated on a livestream that he owned a Genesis.
>A review should be 10-15 Maximum.
youtube.com
Hi.
...
>>Gave BotW a fair review
You shouldn't be allowed to review BotW if you've never played an LoZ game before.
How can someone who hasn't even played OoT consider himself a critic? He's the equivalent of a vapid teenage girl reviewing the latest summer blockbusters, completely pointless unless you also happen to be a vapid teenage girl.
In all fairness, if you took out the skits with the prostitute stuff, it'd be a bit better.
What a fancy way to try to make ppl look dumb if they just dont like what you like.
Nobody else reviews games while shitting themselves in a diaper. Would seeing a reviewer do that make you happy?
Timing, timing timing, timing comedic timing and timing. I have good criticism!!!
Naw you knuckleheads, it's gutted gustavo
The "mr plinkett" reviews are not "reviews" in the traditional sense.
Mike even says it in the "review" it's a fucking post-mortem. They're almost a shot-for-shot analysis of why the prequels are bad movies, and bad star wars movies.
There's no point in playing OoT. It was only critically acclaimed because of the technology on the N64 at the time. Saying you have to play OoT to be a critic is pretentious and retarded, you probably read IGN reviews and take them seriously.
>A review should be 10-15 Maximum
I'd rather watch a 30 min to an hour review that's mildly entertaining than waste a few hours pay on a game I won't enjoy.
He doesn't do any of these things. He parrots every single word he's ever uttered.
Well, it's impossible to play everything.
But the fact that breath of the wild is his "first" Zelda, is pretty telling as to his tastes.
For goodness sake guys. He gave it a 9/10. Stop being so nitpicky.
>NUUU THAT'S NOT HIGH ENOUGH IT DESERVES A 100000/10!
I mean sheesh. Stop forcing your opinions on everyone.
Ok. Me too. That said, nothing you state there defeats his point.
There are plenty of good reviewers that keep their reviews under 15 minutes. If Angry Joe were the only game in town, that would be an argument. But he's not.
Good falseflag Reddit
>Joseph Anderson
4 videos in 6 months. yeah, ok.
>40 minute long review
>20 minutes consists solely of stupid sketches
>15 consists of him screaming "WHAT THE FUCK ACTIVISION?"
>the other 5 are him talking about the game
Didn't he gave Fallout 4 a 9.5/10 or something
7 pesos pedro
>I'm a Western critic!
>Have you seen The Good, the Bad and the Ugly?
>STOP BEING PRETENTIOUS AND RETARDED!
>Only Skyrim-liking casuals dislike the weapon durability because "muh hoard, muh emotional attachment to a bunch of pixels"
No. Sometimes it's really useless and annoying. It doesn't add anything to the game, except wasting your time, because when you need to get another weapon you don't get nervous or worried and say "shit, I need to get another weapon before it's too late", which is honestly not even a good thing in the first place, but insted you simply get disarmed, no real thread whatsoever and you go "Oh for fuck's sake", that's the only functionality of weapon durability in Breath of the Wild.
But he does, he whined about how DICE's Battlefront was a wasteland of empty content and he knows criticizing day one DLCs etc. is easy pickings, so he doesn't go easy on it.
His review is more genuine because of it since he's not a nostalgiafaggot that gave BoTW a 10/10 because it's the new OoT.
LoZ is not necessary to play to have patrician taste, it's normalfag shit. Saying you have to play Call of Duty to be a critic has the very same effect as saying you must have played any Zelda game to become a critic.
>only skyrim-liking casual
But every person who gave BOTW a 10/10 also gave Skyrim a 10/10. So that means Skyrim is objectively a perfect game too, by your logic.
It allows the game to be completely open ended because any boost away from the natural power curve is only temporary, you fucking retard.
Yeah, I think he gave it 8/10
It's pretty clear Rustled Rodrigo would rather do shit like movie reviews since he can just
>go stuff his fat face with popcorn at the theatre for 2 hours
>come home
>do a "review" of the movie by just talking with his "friends" for 30 minutes
>then do another "spoiler" review for another 30 minutes.
No editing, total time, maybe 4 hours all in.
Angry Joe would've stopped doing Angry Reviews all together if he could. He'd much rather just do twitch, and movie reviews since they're easy. It's pretty clear he's just a lazy spic.
This cocksucking fag gave Metal Gear Rising a 7.
I hope he bleeds out in a pile of rusty nails.
Anyone who gave BotW a 10 should be disregarded forever. The technical issues alone should account for a -1, or at the very least, a -0.1 to remove it from a perfect score.
Most reviewers worth their salt won't be giving breath of the wild a perfect review because it's not a perfect game. Expecting anything from the mainstream gaming review sites is a laughable position to be in.
MGR is a fair 7, user
>Film analogy for video games
>Thinks Spaghetti westerns with good plot and acting are the equivalent of a video game praised for technology
Two different things. Are you a. Pretending to be retarded, or b. Retarded?
A better analogy is saying that every critic needs to have watched The Power of Love because it was the first 3D film ever shown. Try an argument next time.
I'm sure his reasons were retarded, but MGR is a solid 7.
>fun as heck
>combat not deep at all
>parry far too overpowered
>some occasionally awkward platforming
Story is balls out, and most of the bosses are fun, and memorable, but the games not perfect.
Eh. If we're trying to be objective as possible, every game in the world that is not considered bug/glitch heavy and shit would get a 7 or 8.
It's all subjective. Although yes, anyone who gives any game a 0 or 10 is probably brain damaged.
why not?
it casts off several of Zelda's traditions
Those were LITERALLY his reasons, fucking kek. Even when he said the parry was too easy and strong, ruining the game's depth.
Plenty of 3D games came before OoT, but OoT completely redefined the experience. If you want to critique something you should know what it is and where it came from.
Go to bed Pedro.
Didn't he also gush all over Skyrim, too?
Well, to be fair fat joe uses the rating scale properly, or at least better than most reviewers. A 7 doesn't mean the game was complete shit like with IGN reviews
>But he does
No he doesn't. They guy parrots every popular opinion. He only got into PC gaming because Spoony kept pushing him, and his first console was an XBox.
Guy is a fucking casual douche, and only an underage retard would actually listen to him.
Peeved Pablo
He attacks Microsoft a lot though
Raging Raul.
You're thinking of Jim "People Will Think I Have Standards if I Yell at Low-Hanging Steam Fruit for Long Enough" Sterling.
This guy isn't based at all. He believes in global warming, like the mountains are melting an we're going to die.
Watching him have a total melt down after Trump got elected shattered my faith in spicy juan.
Sorry for going there, but yeah.
Watched a webm of him just basically on the verge of tears because of stupid inane shit and it was just like "man..grow up what the fuck seriously.."
I'm not upset he's a leftist. Just disappointed he's really really..fucking stupid.
>He believes in global warming, like the mountains are melting an we're going to die.
>Sup Forums's educational level represented in one sentence
Don't worry, Trump will get you rich and out of that fast food job.
Jesus Christ. Anytime anyone on this board expresses their opinion on anything in a positive light its automatically shilling. Honestly, would you rather want posts to be "I like this game/reviewer" without going into reasons why? Why don't you go ahead and define what shilling is and why OP is doing it.
Meant to say:
>This guy isn't based at all. He believes in global warming, like the mountains are melting an we're going to die.
What's wrong with him agreeing with 95% of climate scientists?
No need to be salty, just saying. Maybe someone even has it(the webm). Its really sad to watch. He transforms into a 5 year old.
He should stick to videogames and not discuss things like o-zone layers, etc. He seems to get really upset, verge of tears.
The way he carries himself is embarrassing, that's all I'm getting at. I don't care really where he stands, it was just hard to watch him shed a tear for patches of melted ice that will be back in a year. Like what the fuck dude..
He had a fight with Broteam who is pure basedness so no
>but OoT completely redefined the experience
Because of the technology you fucking spastic, it didn't redefine the video game experience because of the content it had. It was the 3D level design that was amazing.
Go play games that aren't normie shit, John Smith.
I don't like angryjoe, but only because they're fat.
They're reviews are great, bad acting/skits aside.
But what score will he give Persona 5?
I'd be shocked if he even played it. I was genuinely surprised he played NieR Automata.