Will you buy it for $599 if you could play games 4k@ 60fps?

Will you buy it for $599 if you could play games 4k@ 60fps?

No because graphics won't make the system any more of a locked down bullshit console or make the games not be shit.

>games

Any less rather

No because I could just buy a new graphics card for my PC for the same price.

No i'd rather spend more on my computer bringing it up to spec and save on pirating games.

I don't rest know how CPUs work that well but I'm pretty sure my motherboard isn't compatible.

Also

>AMD

It's probably not going to be 4k60.
It would need a much faster CPU for that.

I'll buy it if it has some worthwhile exclusives. That's what I get consoles for. Don't care about 4k.

Boy every console right now has amd hardware except switch. And switch is shit

>4k@ 60fps

What's the point in that if they just have to turn every other setting down to low to make it happen?

If it was a consistent 60 fps, then maybe.

Even if it uses a RX480 and a 5 1400?

Nope. Anything it will have will also be on PC. It and the base xbone literally have no reason to exist.

Not even close for modern titles

>a 5 1400?
Yes. Do you even benchmark bro?

>4k @ 60fps

Won't happen, so why bother asking?

>falling for the 4k spook

Yes but that is impossible. They would have to cram at least $2000 worth of graphics hardware into the machine to run most, if not any, AAA game at max settings, 2160p and 60fps.

Marketing will sure destroy gaming

So AMD gpus are incapable of 4K@60 fps?

>play games 4k@ 60fps?

What games? The Xbone has no games.

>4k@ 60fps
>$599

your consolefaggotry is showing.

>No because graphics won't make the system any more of a locked down bullshit console or make the games not be shit.

FPBP

They can't change the cpu without making compatibility with the current and future xbox one library reliant on a software solution and developer involvement.
It might be possible for microsoft to pull it off with relatively little drama but depending on what they've done with the jaguar cores in the xbox one, it could be impossible to deliver complete compatibility.
Compared to just making a higher clocked jaguar based CPU which would ensure complete compatibility with no effort and easy performance improvements for older titles, while also being the cheaper option, it's clear which Microsoft will go with in the end.

eh you're making something seem like a major deal that isnt. the system software is probably totally agnostic to direct addressing of cores and shit

In general, yes.

It's not going to happen.
Ryzen takes effort. Jaguar doesn't and is cheaper.
It's as simple as that.

>$599
>4k @60

Had a faff and a laff.

>4k@ 60fps
With the lowest fucking quality detail crafted specifically to not be noticed as bad while being checkerboard rendered? Maybe.

No, but it's irrelevant when it won't except for Forza.

If I had 600 bucks to invest in videogames, I would just upgrade my PC.