ITT:The best in their series

ITT:The best in their series

you first

Mass Effect 1 isn't as good as you think it is.

2 was dumbed down garbage compared to 1. It only had better characters

Mass effect has always been mediocre garbage.

The loyalty missions were really good too. Mordin and Legion's missions were the best written parts of the whole series. A shame the main story was trash.

>It only had better characters
Not even that.

>dumbed down
nigger what
they're identical, except the seocnd has better characters, writing, combat and pretty much everything else

>writing
this is what Gears of Effect fags actually believe

...

plot is worse, dialogue is far, far better.

...

lol no

...

>Story/Writing
1 > 2 > 3
>Combat
3 > 2 >1

I swear to God I will never understand Sup Forumss love of ME1s combat. I don't know if they're just retarded or never played on insanity or what.
>muh ""open world"" where I walk up to someone and shoot them in the head is superior to muh corridor where I walk up to someone and shoot them in the head
>that fucking invulnerability game play
>breathtaking sci-fi locations like lava land, ice land, the same prefab buildings x100, and the bikini atoll

What's wrong with this dialogue?

I think most people preferred the idea of Mass Effect 1's combat to the implementation itself.

Mass Effect 2 should have fixed things rather than just throwing it all out of the window. It's hard to spend ~25 hours playing something that's simpler than the predecessor I spent just as long in, even if it is smoother.

They don't have any reason to think a super race of death robots is waiting in deep space. They only have Shepards word for it and to them it's a lot more plausible that Sovereign was just Saren's flagship.

...

(you)

now please stop trolling.

Writing
2=3>1
Combat
3>2>1
Everything else
2>3>1
Ending
1>2>
3

did you have to make another thread you god damn autist?

>combat
>ducking behind cover until your health regenerated itself and running out of ammo are great improvements

Play the game before commenting please.

I didn't even want this to be a mass effect thread.

They could have talked to Vigil, if the writers hadn't contrived a way to get rid of him in the laziest way possible.
Most of the story of the Mass Effect sequels is just based on contrivances.

kek, no. FO1 all the way.

...

WaW

WoW's multiplayer was shitty and broken, even MW2 was better in that regard.

What does "simpler" even mean? They took the combat/power system a step up.
I critique ME1's dull scenery, but that was a justifiable tech limitation at the time. "Fixing" an open world void by filling it with benign shit isn't a good enough reason to ramp up specs and can get you games like DA:I.

I'd rather spend a short time in one area then move somewhere else (with big interesting hubs to explore/get NPC interaction) then have a designated shitting planet that I get to look at for fucking hours while cruising in the struggle buggy.
I'm absolutely fine with a shooting gallery if the shooting is fun and the gallery is nice to look at. I mean most people liked ME3's MP despite EA's kikery exactly because of that reason.