Single player adds multiplayer

>Single player adds multiplayer
>Sup Forums rees going "MULTIPLAYER RUINS THE GAME!!!1"

ITT: Times when Sup Forums was wrong

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=fPLVliLdaPg
merriam-webster.com/dictionary/repetitive
gtaforums.com/topic/744210-sacleowip-2-player-missions-loader/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

How can Sup Forums say multiplayer is bad when Dark Souls is the most beloved/meme'd game on Sup Forums?

But online killed GTA V

last gen consoles and multiplayer crippled gta V

imagine what it could've been

Online ruined GTAV and erased all expectations for expansions like GTA4 motorcycle clubhouse and faggot tony

Because the multiplayer is entirely optional and objectively bad due to shit netcode, backstab fishing scrubs and undead burg invading twinks

>traditionally singleplayer game series
>mods add in their own version of multiplayer thats bare-bones, but fun.
>developers try their hand at it. Barebones in another direction, but it's still fun
>they try again and there isane insane amount of updates, but it's all stuck behind grinding shit (unless you buy sharkcards you goy :^) )
>goy cards work and they shelf the planned singleplayer DLC
They blew it with GTAO

t. can't counter bs fishers

>objectively bad
The only thing objectively bad is your grasp on the English language.

>makes a thread about times when Sup Forums was wrong
>mentions the one time it was right

>Best selling entry by a wide margin
>Killed

Explain

t. dickwraith

> Sup Forums is one person with on opinion

They doomed themselves to forever making MMO's now. You know what the overhead for those is?

Do they still punish you for killing other players?

>DUDE THE GAME SOLD A LOT SO IT'S GOOD LMAO
So I guess Call of Duty's yearly shit must be GOTY for you, right?

I think what bothers me more is that we won't see another GTA until we are well into the next generation of consoles.

They'll keep trying to force GTA:O down your throat for this entire console gen because making another sequel would neuter the money they are milking from those fucking shark cards.
I miss the old days when we got 3 fantastic GTAs on one console.

>I miss the old days when we got 3 fantastic GTAs on one console.
When was this? We got five games on the PS2 and 4 games on the 360. Are we pretending that I, II, and London were good now??

it did ruin the single player though LOL

>We got five games on the PS2
>mfw LCS and VCS got ported to the PS2 so I wasn't restricted to PSP controls

fuck off you underage retard. 1, 2 and were good. i never played london

>1, 2 and were good

All online multiplayer games are fuckin trash.

>he never hacked his save and used the LCS Cheat Device.
Feel immense sadness for you my dude, that stuff was 95% of what made LCS so fun on PSP.

of course you use a reddit pic. like we didn't already know

>knowing what they use there
Maybe you should go back.

>what if he's reddit?
>what if I'm reddit?
>or you?

Justin Bieber tops charts you fucking retard. This kind of argument is always brought out by the most braindead fucking peasants.

The single player was great and the online is fun. Nothing went wrong.

>he thinks GTA:Online isn't shit
$1000 has been added to your GTA:Online wallet

GTA Online is pretty good overall.

Yeah, if you got someone to shoot you with a moneygun

you're not fooling anyone you cancerous faggot

@373290604
@373291081
>samefagging for (You)'s
embarrassing desu

GTA V is so easily the best that i have to believe none of you have even played the other ones recently. I thought you faggots were masterrace.

Its literally NEVER been about the story. Its always been about the map and the mods, of which GTA V is easily the best. Even if you were a faggot who doesn't mod, there's still director mode.

>don't judge a game based on what the developers did, base it own what the community does to fix their broken garbage
No.
Fuck off.

>Its always been about the map and the mods, of which GTA V is easily the best.

The only reason developers do this is because you retards buy into it.

>he actually enjoys driving from point a to b: the game

Haha wow. Let me guess, red dead is in your top 10. What a faggot.

You're exactly the type of faggot that doesn't know get why GTA has even been worth playing

>huge map
>nothing to do other than stupid minigames
yes GOAT.

Are you equating sales numbers to a good game?

Good marketing can make even the lowest form of quality sell beyond expectations.

>meanwhile in passed GTA games: less to do with even less variety

Sugoi

>no argument defending the game itself, just the bandaids that the community shits out
Nice. Keep buying Bethesda games you mongoloid. You stupid faggots are the reason skyrim 2.0 was even created. You buy shit in hopes that someone else will sprinkle your shit with sprinkles.
Try buying a worthwhile game that could be enhanced with mods, rather than a trashcan that you'll hope modders will come around and turn your dumpster into a Pinto.

GTA Online did ruin the game. They should have left that job to modders because SA MP is still a lot better than the trash Rockstar produced.

meanwhile... a challenger appears

>you retards

no i didnt you fucking potato

GTA:O didn't really affect GTA V, but GTA:O was shit on it's own.

The single player was ok.

>GTA:O didn't really affect GTA V
They cut content out of the single player to make it exclusive to multiplayer you mouthbreathing mong.

Shit on it as much as you want. Its still more than past games objectively and with mods it's not even close. Go back to your 30 fps console baby

ITT: Sup Forums forgot how to enjoy vidya.

Guess again, faggot.

go back to mario cart, kid

Bout time people make successful MMOs

Well, they did re-release for current gen consoles and PC too.

>online takes 10 minutes to load

Fucking dropped it.

The game itself loads fine, it's the fucking awful connections that everyone has trouble loading into.
They should have gone with some sort of server-based system but that gives the players too much power.

Is this your gaming setup?

And?

>duh console
>proof that I've been on PC for well over a decade.
It's even longer but that badge is proof enough.
I probably had a PC longer than you've been alive, niglet.

My complaints with the game.
>Shortest story
>Shittiest story too, being government cucks for the majority of the game isn't a good story
>Generic antagonists
>Small "main" city with tons of empty, boring countryside
>Fewest missions, also heist prep count as missions
>While we're at it, heists were a huge letdown. Only one is a real heist. GTA IV's one heist still manages to BTFO any of V's
>The 360/PS3 version had the worst radio. Only slightly better with the re-release
>Los Santos smaller and less detailed than Liberty City
>No vigilante missions
>Less fleshed out in-game internet, despite coming out five years after GTA IV
>Barely any interiors
>Can't replenish health at restaurants or hot dog stands
>Cops are far too unfair and unfun, they should not be able to snipe you from a helicopter while you're underwater
>Cops in general are too aggressive and rubberband like crazy
>Removal of Pay & Sprays
>Too much focus on online, single player taking a backseat & there will never be a GTA V single player expansion

If there will ever be a GTA VI, I firmly believe it won't even have a single player mode and will instead be a strictly online game with microtransactions up the ass. More likely, the future of GTA is just going to be rolling updates for GTA: Online.

To the Gen Z dweebs who eat this faggot shit up, I have one question: What's the fucking appeal?

In twenty five years of playing video games, GTA: Online has to be one of the most crushingly disappointing things I've ever experienced. I've severed ties with the franchise.

The Steam ports of the GTA3 trilogy are fucking garbage as well.

Nah, most of Sup Forums's genuine community just developed critical thinking.

>mods
>of which GTA V is easily the best
You what nigga? GTA V has fuck all for mods, and the best part is they can even get you banned too.

>@
go back to twitter, retard

Yes, user. PCs were around in 2004. You sure blew me away.

I'm not gonna defend any side of the arguments here, but i have always played GTA just to fuck around. Get 5 stars and killa a bunch of cops and try to survive as long as i can, and many other silly things that are not related to the story or missions. GTA V has been extremely good for that purpose. The missions have always been more of a bonus for me. Can't really comment on online as i pirated the game, but i'm seriously considering on buying it to try it out.

>gta o
>less everything and worse graphics

Wow so the nostalgiafags were really just whining about gtao

Most people who complain about GTA V complain about GTA: O, yeah. Because of that piece of shit, Cockstar diverted all their time and resources to maintaining Online, not the single player with expansions like they did with GTA IV. This is largely responsible for the shittiness of GTA V's single player.

>less everything and worse graphics

Less everything? V has fewer missions and far fewer interiors among other things, and worse graphics? Oh dear! You mean to tell me a game from 2008 won't have the same graphics as a game that came out in 2013 & was re-mastered for current gen/PC? You don't say?

>thinks things cannot be objectively bad

A level of retardation that is not available anywhere else but Sup Forums.

>even attempting to discuss gta iv missions

Quickest way for me to immediately disregard everything you have to say.

>fewer missions/interiors

Nope

>Quickest way for me to immediately disregard everything you have to say.

And why is that? Are they not as good as, say, Prep for Government Heist #3, or Prep for Government Heist #4?
In what way are V's missions better? I'm genuinely curious.

>fewer missions/interiors
Factually true though. You can't refute this one.

Funny how you bring up V's missions first. Gee, wonder why that could be.

Nothing factual about it. V has more programmed interiors and it's a simple matter of adding them all into freeroam.

@373294029
You got a le fucking problem newfag?

oh boy can't wait to play some GTA multiplayer, I think I'll do a heist
>boot up game
>loading
>select multiplayer
>loading
>loading
>loading
>okay, let's do a heist
>loading
>okay, I'm ready to do the heist
>loading
>oh no, the heist went wrong
>loading
fuck this game

Hey you know the Twilight movies!???
They sold a lot.

That must mean they're the best movie huh

>tfw GTAV is the only 3D GTA game I've never finished

I've even managed to get through the boring slog that is IV twice. But V just bores the shit out of me on a whole new level.

Fuck this game? FUCK THIS GAME?! NO! FUCK YOU! FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU! DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE DIE! WHY WON'T YOU JUST DIE ALREADY?! FUCKING DIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIE!

>Gee, wonder why that could be.
Because they fucking blew, even compared to IV's mediocre ones?

>Nothing factual about it. V has more programmed interiors
No, even factoring those in there aren't. youtube.com/watch?v=fPLVliLdaPg

GTA IV still has more interiors. More so when you include TBOGT.

I legit downloaded it a week ago. I uninstalled it two days later.

Worst fucking controls in a AAA game in years. I knew it was gonna be a boring ubisoft sandbox but damn that game was just tedious as fuck to play.

Could it be because wasting several hours doing the 4's EXACT same mission x100 made you realize how shit rockstar missions are? IV was the definition of repetitive, hands down

I know. It also had unfathomably bad controls and a pretty damn boring story.

Yet I completed the story twice and couldn't even get halfway through V, and I've tried playing it three times now.

I guess it's just because IV was a bit of a novelty. The city, boring as it was, was still so damn detailed, and it had so much technology, while V in comparison just feels like more(or less) of IV but with less gray and more yellow.

Those are huge and chunky, spaces for you fags to beat off to. That definitely adds up to 4's box rooms.

>expansions
Didn't play those. So this is just another case of someone whining about V not having expansions then?

No because you're looking st 4 with rose tinted goggles and v is fresh in your mind. Rockstar missions are shit, but if you don't remember how bad 4 did it then I'm going to assume you were a child and grew up with it. Its inexcusable.

Yeah it was repetitive, no doubt. Still massively preferred it to GTA V though. V couldn't decide if it wanted to be wacky and less serious like San Andreas, or still more gritty and "realistic" like GTA IV. It failed to appease either.

APOLOGISE

>IV was the definition of repetitive,

If you took five seconds to look up the definition of "repetitive" you'd know there isn't a single mention of GTA IV in it.


merriam-webster.com/dictionary/repetitive

Human Revolution had multiplayer?

Not him but I remember most missions were
first half
>talk to local gangster/roman
>do a tutorial mission for a feature you will never touch again
>repeat
second half
>go to local gangster
>shoot up some dudes
>repeat

>Those are huge and chunky, spaces for you fags to beat off to. That definitely adds up to 4's box rooms.
You're seriously talking like interiors are a bad thing? IV had more than "box rooms," try entire apartment buildings.

>Didn't play those. So this is just another case of someone whining about V not having expansions then?
Yeah, how unreasonable for someone to take even the slightest bit of umbrage to the fact that Cockstar doesn't won't enhance the single player in any way but instead adds meaningless updates to the horrible Online mode and gouge little kids for virtual dollars.

>No because you're looking st 4 with rose tinted goggles and v is fresh in your mind. Rockstar missions are shit, but if you don't remember how bad 4 did it then I'm going to assume you were a child and grew up with it. Its inexcusable.
I was 18 when GTA IV came out, and I replayed it earlier this year. Sorry friend, but the fact that you can bitch about IV's missions but completely gloss over V's with a straight face is just ridiculous. Go back to GTA: Online and buy some Shark cards.

Hey, look at the fucking DEFINITION and shut the hell up. There is not ONE JUST ONE MENTION of GTA IV in IT soooooooooooo SHUT UP!

I have to fucking clue what you are trying to say right here.

Are you really this dense? Here let me put in bullet points for you dumbass.

>retard says GTA IV is the definition of repetitive
>look up definition of repetitive
>absolutely NO mention of GTA IV in it

Seriously how are you this fucking stupid?

>tfw having fun with my brother on GTA SA with this mod
gtaforums.com/topic/744210-sacleowip-2-player-missions-loader/

Oh. Sorry. I wasn't on the same level of trivial banal thinking as you.

>hurr muh apartments

I'd take Franklin's home with his pitbull which actuslly affects gameplay over those box rooms. Not that it matters. Your priorities in gaming is absolute ass.

>gloss over 5
Rockstar and most open world missipns are shit. It's an improvement and that's all I've said. Not that that's much of an accomplishment after 4's lazy fucking missions.

Seriously dude just shut up, you're wrong. Get over it. Don't say things are things when they aren't things that can take literally less than ten seconds to figure out. Christ either you're incredibly underaged or one of the biggest fucking retards on this board if you don't even know how to look up a simple definition. Janitor, please, get rid of this dumbfuck before it's too late. He already derailed this stupid thread with his nonsense don't let it get even worse with her pathetic attempts at damage control. For the love of GOD delete her posts already. Just.... fuck man. Fuck.
FUCK!

Who the fuck actually argues over rockstar games lmao

All the same shit, literally just preference over the map

Is this some new copypasta/meme I'm not aware of?

>I'd take Franklin's home with his pitbull which actuslly affects gameplay over those box rooms
You mean Rottweiler? And how does Chop affect gameplay in any meaningful way? Also Frank's home is just a bunch of box rooms, is it not? Explain to me the difference between his home versus the various apartment buildings you could walk up in IV with goodies scattered between them.

>Not that it matters. Your priorities in gaming is absolute ass.
Says the furry who likes his big, macho dogs and thinks they affect the game in a meaningful way.

>It's an improvement and that's all I've said
Explain, instead of contradicting yourself.

What can you do in this game? I mean it has only few heists.

You can play the awesome Online mode and buy virtual money, along with the cool things it lets you buy in-game! Awesome, huh?