What went wrong?

What went wrong?

Other urls found in this thread:

techraptor.net/content/prey-review-dont-fear-reaper
twitter.com/AnonBabble

They canned Prey 2

(((reviewers))) have shit taste

>4 points less
damn...

SonyPony only enjoy cinematic experience and can't deal with gameplay outside of QTE.

Is the original Prey still not available digitally? I pirated the game when it came out but wouldn't mind buying it now

Arkane still can't match the quality of the two decade old games they're trying to recreate. Who could've predicted this?

I honestly think Nu-Prey is too hard for Reviewers

FPS are PC exclusive because of the mouse.

Why the fuck would you ever buy multiplats on console? Are you retarded?
See

that can be said about video games in general

No bounty hunting on space

Standards of quality for AAA in 2006 were different. And Prey(2006) was an interesting game despite being flawed and unpolished with a bunch of ridiculous shit, it managed to be kind of endearing. Sup Forums probably won't care about the fact that it positively portrayed a native guy and made him the main character, but that was also pretty big from a "this game breaks new ground" standpoint and got it brownie points in the media.

Prey(2016) is another Horizon: Zero Dawn. It's this well polished and smooth game but it has no sense of originality at all outside the gameplay design for the mimics. It's a collection of common tropes put together effectively but it has nothing special that lets it rise above that like say Persona 5(which despite a being giant collection of anime tropes rises above it because it positively oozes style and has characters you like) does. You'd probably see it tick a couple points higher if the main character was canon black or some shit.

I think a roughly 8/10 is appropriate for it. I certainly suspect the original Prey will remain more memorable.

>Prey(2016) is another Horizon: Zero Dawn. It's this well polished and smooth game but it has no sense of originality at all outside the gameplay design for the mimics
Are you fucking retarded? If it was another ubisoft collectaton with muh graphics critics would shower it in praises.

one of the problems is that metacritic is taking reviews in progress and taking a score from them

forbes wrote about this

so id suggest waiting a few more days

>Comparing a turn-based RPG to an action-based RPG
Why are weebfags so retarded?

>horizon zero dawn
>no originality

Please do show me all these other games that resemble Horizon.

Also it's only now that I finished reading the rest of your absolute garbage of a post and here I am laughing at you for saying that horizon is unoriginal while unironically defending a game like persona 5, which is nothing but a giant conglomeration of extremely cliche characters you'd all down to the generic as fuck anime high school setting where the main character is the special snowflake. You should consider being a comedian, you won't even have to put in any effort other than walking into the room of your audience, being the joke yourself.

>Prey(2016) is another Horizon: Zero Dawn. It's this well polished and smooth game but it has no sense of originality at all outside the gameplay design for the mimics.
>no sense of originality at all outside the gameplay design for the mimics.

And this my friends is how you spot someone who hasn't played the game.

Literally every open world game.

>Bethesda

>And Prey(2006) was an interesting game despite being flawed and unpolished

this is why video games were so much better in the past
we don't have AA games anymore
big game studios don't take risks
I'll take an interesting but flawed game over bog standard passable games

>we don't have AA games anymore

We have but Sup Forums and normies shit on them freaking hard.

examples?

>original Prey
>memorable

people shitting up genuiely good games like new prey is why video games are shit

Cyanide
Spiders
Piranha Bytes

Apparently Xbots love it.

I've never seen a multiplat game with such polarizing scores across the different platforms

>Apparently Xbots love it.
It's not like they have much of a choice.

No no no I know why PS4's review is so low and Xbox One's score is so high

It's because in recent months PS4 has had a non-stop slew of high quality titles, so the standards of those reviewers have been raised. Where as PC & Xbox One reviewers have been starving for new quality AAA games for months so their inner standards have been lowered.

Its the same sort of reason Dragon Age Inquisition won GOTY in 2014

Xbone have better version without input lag. It's simple, really.

It's because there is input lag on the PS4 version

What competition does Prey even have on Xbone

Xbots are just happy to have another game to play

>It's because in recent months PS4 has had a non-stop slew of high quality titles

like what?

Well, yeah, It's a game. That's a rarity to Xboners.

>I don't know how averages work

Get out of here with your weebshit. Persona 5 is literally the same shit as the previous two games.

>one is a super mario galaxy-esque bizzaro adventure shooter with cool native american super powers

>the other is bioshock with mimics

interdasting

(You)

"reviewers" went wrong:

techraptor.net/content/prey-review-dont-fear-reaper

t. hasn't actually played Prey 2017