Souls-style gameplay

>Souls-style gameplay
>sci-fi/robotic setting

Why aren't you faggots talking about this?

Other urls found in this thread:

thesurge.wiki.fextralife.com/Bosses
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>LotF devs

Nowhere near the quality that lotf was.

It's ugly, uninspired and boring.
They could've done so much more but they went the lazy way.
Every enemy looks the same: Some dude in exosuite with a different weapon.
No open level, all corridors.
All washed up colours and gray cement.

Because it looks boring

Art direction looks like shit

>5 bosses

because it looks better than Souls and its not made in Japan

Sounds like a Souls game alright.

>souls

God can we please stop this

Are you saying this is higher quality or lotf was lmao can't tell.. either way lotf was hot garbage (yes I finished it) and I've watched a few hours of the surge on twitch and it looks really fucking average.. good combat with no story and really shitty level design.. fact they want full price for it is a joke

>why aren't you faggots talking about this
>ignores the other thread
kys if you're too stupid to use the catalog OP

Looks even worse than LotF in terms of gameplay
Also the first few hours are spend on the most visually uninteresting junkyard i've seen in a videogame.

I'll tell you why it's shit and no one is talking about it

>5 bosses
>no online
>dull industrial setting
>no character customization
>level design is just corridor after corridor
>story is straight forward scifi shit
>only 1 location
>no enemy variety

Now fuck off shill

>good combat with no story and really shitty level design
So just like any souls game then?

>fact they want full price for it is a joke
They don't though. It's 50 euros, AAA pricing would be 60 euros.

I wasn't gonna say shill in the last thread from 30min ago, but I c u now shill

>unique game comes out a few years ago with a few defining mechanics that separate it from other popular rpgs at the time
>sequels come out and are just as successful while keeping those same mechanics
>other developers take note and start taking inspiration from those games and making their own inspired version of the game borrowing mechanics that define what set that game apart from things like skyrim

this is how a genre is made user, there are already a lot of these games coming out and the term seems to be souls-like at the moment so try to contain your autism

Source that there are only 5 bosses?

Different flavour of knights, monsters and demons are cooler than just zombies in exosuit and robot-monsters that look like they were imagined by an uninspired construction worker.

Also, castles & fantasy landscapes are better than generic post apocalyptic future warehouses & dark corridors.

thesurge.wiki.fextralife.com/Bosses

no quality nor quantity in this game

All those shitty armors reminds me of the shitty ghost from Destiny.

Mods please ban western garbage from Sup Forums

But I want tron-lines, techno crystals, liquid metal sci-fi.
This is rather bland heavy industrial in-the-very-near-future sci-fi.

It's ugly, bland, and clunky.

One of the biggest red flags in gaming nowadays should be if a developer compares their game to Soulsborne.

Game looks boring but I'm pretty sure no one knows any of those specific details if no one talks about it ever. Did everyone play it and figure out there's only 5 bosses and no enemy variety before it released?

>Souls style game
>made by western devs

Yes? Streamers have played through the entire game already

Sup Forums needs to be split into Sup Forums - Video Games and /vj/ - Weebshit.

I don't know what's worse. Watching a stream of the entire game when you're interested in buying it or watching a stream of the entire game when you have no interest in it at all.

ITT: underages who dont know about Severance: Blade of Darkness the original "souls" game made by westerns

animation wise it looks awful and that's enough to make me not play a game

5 BOSSES
B
O
S
S
E
S

>chromatic abberation
>lotf devs
Stop shilling your game

Hell yeah, the successor to the hit masterpiece Lords of the Fallen! Why aren't we talking about this??

Where did I say I've seen the entire game? I just said that people have played through it

Day 1 torrent for this crap anyways, good on them for not slapping denuvo on it

LOTF was atleast better than DS2

>other thread's dead
you goofed, faggot

It doesn't look very good

>wait until the thread falls off page 10 to respond
wow user, you sure got me

Because it's by CI games.

It's surprisingly good to be honest.

Demon souls > Bloodborne > Dark Souls > The Surge > Dark Souls 3 > Dark Souls 2

Does it matter if there's only 5 bosses? What's the entire game like? FFS, Breath of the Wild has 5 bosses and you faggots are STILL choking on that Link cock.

>5 bosses
>one of the 5 bosses is literally just the first boss three times in a row
>normal enemies are also all complete uninspired drone garbage

It's not made by FROM

>was at page 10 when you linked
I sure as fuck did, you dumb fuck

This, I know its slav time but dont start shilling too hard now. Stick to the witcher 3 thats a half decent slav game.

Even dark souls 2 shits on the surge and i say this as someone who thinks only a subhuman full blown mental retard would ever rte DS2 as anything but the worst souls game..

It was at page 7 when linked, it's almost like you don't understand the concept of time.

Cause it's not out yet. Also it's kinda bland looking. Feels like it takes place at a loading dock or something.

Zelda is about exploration and also has minibosses

Games like the surge are purely about combat and bossfights.

The combat is better, but they still missed details that make Souls so good. Like having weapons that have a lot of different moves that combo into each other. But not in the sense you press X X Y and something happens only in that order, more like those little moves you get for doing a roll attack, or a backsteb attack.

And really when it comes down to it if you dont find the weapons fun then the whole system falls down.

>more autistic rating and demons at the top
would you just duck off

it's almost like nobody cares

Cause it somehow looks like a budget indie game that should maybe be 30 bucks

>Cause it's not out yet
Are you dense?

>LotF devs
>looks like Clunky Souls
>slow-mo combat

You shills never tire, do you?

What, like Phantasy Star level?

I don't get how people want more sous games. there has been a bunch in the past years and they aren't that fun

I'd have tried it for 30 bucks.

Full price is ridiculous considering the game is only 35 hours long according to the devs.

>unique game comes out a few years ago with a few defining mechanics that separate it from other popular rpgs at the time

There is literally nothing unique or definitive about the Souls franchise, it's a callback to King's Field that derives a large degree of its mechanical hallmarks from Monster Hunter, which itself borrows from King's Field. This game, LOTF, and other shitty ripoffs are failing to realize where the core of the combat's functionality comes from, which is why they are all shit. "Slow" isn't a good determining factor for what makes combat good, it's all about how deliberate attacks are. This game is no different from any other MH clone. In fact, it's pretty much Freedom Wars with obscenely shittier combat, painfully more generic environments, enemies, and character design, and seemingly even LESS of a boring, dull story. "Souls-like" is a meme, please stop trying to force it.

I really hate Witcher 3 for setting this unreasonable expectation that every game should be at least 100 hours long or it's not worth the money.

You know that the first mario game was like 2 hours long and it costed 80 bucks back when it launched?

You need to be a certain level to advance to the next area

>35 hours

An avid Souls friend of mine who got a review code finished it in 18

Levels are way more important than bosses
The game is still shit but its amount of bosses has very little to do with that.

Yeah but Mario also had deeper combat than The Witcher 3

they are not using denuvo again so start sucking their dick

Just watched videos of all the bosses and some areas. Why do all the enemies and bosses look so generic in this game. First boss is a template generic mech, sechond boss is a ring with 4 legs, third boss is literally just a few metal arms with weapons attached to them, hacking away at you, 4th boss is LITERALLY just the first boss THREE TIMES IN A ROW and the last boss is another generic "le evil-black ooga booga monster mash up of all the nanites"

I would buy this game for 5 bucks

It's called competition buddy. This game is trying to compete with games that not only are of higher quality but also twice as long for the same price.

never been one for exo-suit low tech sci-fi

call me when its lightsabers n shit.

$2~ per hour of entertainment is damn good.

define deliberate attacks

upvoted

18 HOURS
8
H
O
U
R
S

Fighting bots, the most boring enemy, in a factory, the most boring setting.
Snooze Souls

>But Scifi Souls..
Kys

levels and bosses are about on par with regards to importance in a souls game

but it's 1) not entertaining and 2) alot more expensive than what you get for other games of the genre which are all 2/3 times as long

We've been over this before, that's a terrible idea. Sup Forums was split 4 times already because of fags like you. There is a huge dearth of actual videogames threads on Sup Forums, some of it is weebshit but i'll take it because its fucking videogames.

This and the blatant shilling on Sup Forums by the devs.

Apart from that I would like to discuss this game because it does look mildly interesting. Environments do look dull but combat looks fun at least.

>people like things you don't like
>people want more of what they enjoy

Wow so hard.

buying it today when its out.

thats subjective and i have all the dark souls games on computer already

Post webm
I didn't see a single picture of this game

Attacks which have different paces and speeds that reward players for timing and punish them for swinging will-nilly without a care in the world. If the overall speed of the game is such that every attack you loose is not even worthy of the mental calculation of everything around you, the attacks are not deliberate, they are just poorly animated and poorly thought out.

Monster Hunter has deliberate attacks which are strikingly fast, because the blowback from enemies is markedly faster, does dramatically higher damage output than you could even dream of, and even with their relative speed, locking yourself into a multi-hit attack can be an outright death sentence in many cases. This game simply has "Slow" attacks so it looks like they are weighted, but when everything is painfully slow, the entire structure falls apart due to how your attacks aren't really made with any timing in mind, simply when is a vaguely decent time to bash this hoverbot or that exo-zombie.

>souls is a wrpg by asian devs
hmmmm

Souls combat isn't fun.

maybe you shouldve said that instead of hurrdurr it needs to be long

That's the attitude that allowed the devs to follow up one shitty souls clone with another shitty souls clone. As long as you keep supporting bad games the games will stay bad.

Thanks for explaining yourself

>souls is a wrpg
never

They didn't manage to get this right for LotF and they managed to make it even worse for their next game.

>your taste is wrong and my opinion is objective fact

But i did. Bad game for the same price than better and longer games.

I liked it better than DaS2/3.

Not amazing by any means, but still a solid experience. I actually really liked the gameplay, not slow at all (well, depending on how you upgrade your character)

you make it sound like there is a huge load of these clones and that they are all bad

battle royale games/survival are actually bad games and cashgrabs
this game just from trailers is easy to tell had effort put into it
its not even a clone the setting is completely different and is singleplayer only

Because it comes from the same team as lords of the fallen and they've repeatedly proven they're incapable of making a game that doesn't play like garbage. And they seriously need to stop putting all their eggs in the souls clone basket.

>"there is no objectivity to anything"

do you honestly believe that the witcher 3 isn't objectively better than Sonic colors?The fact that you enjoy something doesn't change it's objective quality, which in this case is horrendous compared to its competitiors.

>2$ per hour
That's outright terrible. If the game is good enough, it should warrant multiple playthroughs if it's short, or afford a rich experience if it's nice and long. If you can't squeeze $1 per hour out of a game for the price tag, it's already a bad investment. Innumerable people on Sup Forums have spent hundreds of hours on every single Souls-borne game, some more than others, and maybe that $2/hr value wouldn't have mattered in your first run, but if your game burns out after one run, and clearly has nothing else interesting to do, it's a shitty investment.

>game isn't even out


This is how bad the anti-souls shitposting has become

>taste having anything to do with objective measurements of quality