Consoles hold back pc graphics

>consoles hold back pc graphics

you were saying?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Y6PQ19BEE24
youtube.com/watch?v=rxC6nvkCRQA
steamspy.com/country/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Exception
Not Rule

>See, console games don't hold back pc games!
>uses a console exclusive as an example

now let's see it in motion

End yourself, shill

IT'S CONSOLES GODDAMNIT! EVERY PC GAMER HAS TITAN X'S SLI. I SWEAR! BELIEVE ME! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>a static, pre-rendered scene with no interaction, no AI, no nothing = totally proves muh point!

>entire level except several doors is completely static
>why aren't you impressed yet

>consoles hold back pc graphics
>devs criticized for already focusing too much on graphics now
if devs were expected to fully utilize the latest GPUs, they would have to pour even more of their budgets into graphics. so maybe consoles holding them back should be considered a good thing?

>yet still no level in a PC game that looks this good
Really makes you think

>tfw not gimped down by pc port

...

>static environments with almost no interaction
>runs like ass most of the time
>fucking boring

Moving on.

A lot of russian, chinese and southamericans came to Steam for Dota 2, there are tons of people with nothing but Dota 2 in their accounts.

PC exclusives rarely look as good as PS4 exclusives. No development team/publisher could justify spending the amount of money it would take for a minority of PC gamers that would be able to play it, yielding very little to no profit. With consoles you have a lot of support for funding and development.

Can you imagine world without pc ports?
It would be a world without downgrades basically.

youtube.com/watch?v=Y6PQ19BEE24
This is now 3 years old

Wasn't this rendered on a PC though?

>Hi, I've never played this game but I'm going to talk shit about it as if I have anyways.

Pre-rendered on PC

Oh really? Nice! Where's your source to back up this claim user?

But this isn't even a game, so what point are you making?

>photo mode
now let's see it in gameplay

picture is accurate, most pc gamers play league, csgo and dota

Is this the sequel to Gone home?

You're fucking stupid. RUs and BRs are on Steam due to CS:GO and Dota and they have shit rigs.

>slow motion

If it was, it would have been downgraded.
Many such cases...

The most popular PC games are Minecraft and Hotline Miami, sure pc have better graphics

>359x200

It's rendered in unreal engine 4, same as any Uncharted screenshot

does console gamer think rock falling is impressive?

>mustardcuck damage control
PFFFFFFFFFFFAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>trying to bait people into a console vs pc graphics argument
You are a sad little man OP, and I pity you. Next time you should use those great exclusive games as your point and why everyone should throw hundreds of dollars on a machine that has two good games and 98 mediocre multi plats

I did play it. I almost beat it.

I made it to just after Elena rescues Drake after the big reveal and they go hiking through the jungle.

The game has 1 fun part.

The sequence starting from the Clock Climb and ending after the Truck chase.
That was extremely fun. One of the best sequences I've played in an action game, period.

The rest? Absolutely fucking boring.
The puzzles were uninspired and dull.
The combat is boring.
The settings were almost all boring.

It's incredibly dull.

Pretty, yes. Some neat features (such as in your gif related) but barely any substance.

It just felt like a shinier, somehow dumbed down Uncharted 3.

Fucking boring, man.

You mean framerate you dumb shit.

>console thread
>bullshots everywhere

sony thread? sony thread.

UGGHHHH!!!!
FRE*KING DELET THIS THREAD RIGHT THIS INSTANT!!!!!!!!

It's not damage control retard, it's straight up logic. Who needs a high end PC if all you're playing is F2P MOBA shit all day every day?

>this is game released in 2017 exclusively on PC
youtube.com/watch?v=rxC6nvkCRQA
just look at the graphics...

shit meant to post this one

>n-no we all h-have top end m-m-m-machines
AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

The state of Sup Forums. End this board.

They do?

Consoles have hardware of slightly before the time they're released and so the development capabilities of games is confined to that hardware for 4-6 years while that console is current.

Games developers don't design games to be next-gen utilizing current hardware because the PC market is not big enough for them to make so much money. They'll make higher profits selling a shitty-looking game to millions of console players who don't know any better and then porting it to fun-hungry PC cucks than they would to develop a game with modern graphical effects.

Don't understand the complaint.

They're going to develop for the people who actually buy games. Console game sales are several times the sales of PC game sales, even by an individual console basis.

PC gamers either play mostly online competitive games with microtransactions (which, despite being PC exclusive, do not have amazing graphics that would not work on console), or buy them when they're 90% off on Steam (or straight out pirate them).

Witcher 3 wouldn't have had the sort of budget it had if it didn't go console.

Reality is, unless you can find a way to get far more PC users to be willing to buy non-Multiplayer games, it will continue to work this way.

Prove it then. It should be easy right, Mr. MasterRace?

Don't you think you are trying a little too hard?

>millions of console players who don't know any better
Easier entry point for console users. Valve was going to attempt to break that barrier with the Steam Box stuff, but completely screwed the pooch when they let every other company design their own, with wildly different specs and cost points. It wasn't as simple a buy-in as a console.

>Oversharpening an image = good graphics
I want to murder everyone who does this shit.
Tone it down with the sharpening, it's always either an Unchartedfag or a TW3fag doing it too, fucking stop it, it looks ugly, sharpening your image doesn't make it look less jaggy you fucks.

consoles support this trend of making everything blurry as shit, your screenshot is a perfect example
it's like all ps4 game protagonists are half blind

graphics hold back gaming

...

not very original. sad part is, some newfags will actually buy this shit.

>a chart with no references and links

Great source there my man! Upvote!

consoles hold back pc graphics

are you deaf?

I'm sorry you're too retarded to read filenames.
steamspy.com/country/

>mustards on suicide watch

Here are the Steam stats for today. Notice that they are mostly F2P or extremely cheap and low power games. Reminder that this doesn't include the millions of people playing League every day. You don't need a powerful machine or money to play these, which is why the Steam stats are skewed away from high cost/performance cards.

the problem with these UE4 demos (or whatever that is if not) is that artists will never actually design environments like this because their tools aren't intuitive enough to actually include that much detail in a current game unless it's indie dev tier low in content.

What you end up with most of the time in practice is stuff like astroneer with cool effects sort of wasted on poor environments.

So you're saying that most mustards are literal 3rd world monkeys who cannot stop playing assfaggots?

MASTER RACE AMIRITE????????

PFHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHNAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

>bullshots

You're trying to equate a platform that has thousands of configurations and hundreds of millions of users to a platform that has two configurations and 55 million users

Why are consoles holding back graphics so much?
What's their end-game?

If ARK and Rust has taught me anything it's that you need a billion dollar Chinese supercomputer to play all those shitty multiplayer survival games.

DAMAGE CONTROL
A
M
A
G
E

C
O
N
T
R
O
L

>hundreds of millions of users
...most of which who don't really play games on their PCs, but use for work or office-related purposes.

Memes and goldface posting are not arguments.

n-no my friends on r-reddit said we're m-master r-r-r-r-race

Why does the lightning and water look so shit?

>Sup Forums last generation when Uncharted 1-3 came out
"Fucking movie games suck"
>Sup Forums in 2017 after Uncharted 4 was the only game available besides memeborne
"UNCHARTED IS THE BEST GAME EVER MADE AND HAS THE GREATEST GRAPHICS EVER"
really fires up my jimmy neutrons

He's talking about strictly gaming.
Steam and LoL alone have over 200 million users.

>t. goalpost-moving mustardcuck

haha, put me in le epik screencap, reddit

Yes, photomode is a bullshot you idiot.
It increases the resolution, draw distance, lighting effects, shadows, anti alliasing etc.

Just Sonyfags user, they don't have anything else to play.

Exactly, but if they have Steam installed, they still count towards the hardware survey. 125 million Steam account are currently active

>Popular PC games have shit graphics
What exactly does that prove? PC still has better graphics.

>mfw reading this salty ass low-info post

>make game run unplayable slow
>"s-see, we have graphics too!"

>that fucking water
How is this a 2015 game

Speaking of static images, look what the PC can render nowadays.

BTFO

Wow, look at all this grass

LoL counts all accounts as individual "users", and count inactive accounts (and you're just taking their word for it, there's no actual public tracking).

Steam will count inactive accounts as well (see actual number of users of Steam at any given time; you can be really generous with how many are not online at the moment, but that's still far away from the number you're implying).

Bullshitting for marketing purposes is not unique to gaming, really. Happens in any industry.

Looks almost as good as The Last of Us

That also brings into question what the term "PC Gamer" means. My girlfriend has a half-a-decade old laptop with The Sims 3 installed---is she a gamer? I'm sure people with Chromebooks played Farmville during it's *ahem* hayday...are they gamers?

These occurrences are rarer on console were everyone typically purchases a console to play games on almost exclusively---barring medium shifts (PS2-DVD, PS3- Blu Ray).

It's impossible to measure but I'd say true gaming PCs most have a dedicated GPU from at least five or six years ago, a dual core processor and 4-8 GB RAM to be considered. Most of those will be fairly close to the base PS4 and X1.

So you're confirming the post you're replying to, with visible butthurt, and somehow they're stupid?

I would have posted the 8K version of that image, but Sup Forums wont let me.

Nice aliasing faggot. That looks like fucking shit.

>Static scene with nothing going on
Nice techdemo.

This whole thread is full of grass, that's like the main setting of Uncharted, grass.

>incidentally, these surveys are voluntary, and most people who know enough about PCs to built powerful ones opt out of them, so this survey kind of tells you shit.

What would be the point? It's just a 1080p screenshot resized.

It would still look worse.
>MORE RESOLUTIONS MORE GRAFX XD
I'm sure you tell yourself that when playing minecraft at 8k.

No it doesnt you dumbfuck. Theres a webm of switching back and forth from photo mode to gameplay and its the same graphics. The PS4 Pro version of UC4 runs in a native 1440p too.

It's hacked Crysis 3, what i posted was actually downsized.

It would still look worse

The term "gamer" for people who play video games has always felt stupid, anyway. Just about everyone plays video games in some for or other.

I'm still used to the 90's and earlier usage of it referring to people who play tabletop war games, board games, CCGs, and tabletop RPGs.

It's usage changing has been really weird.

pc cucks have tiny dicks lmao

come back when consoles do 120hz ulmb lmao