>I made my point.
You did, here is your claim: "1. Stop trying to argue that Smash is a fighting game."
For example, I am not arguing that Smash is a fighting game. Personally, I do not have a solid set of criteria or analysis of overlapping components of games like SF, BB, GG, and so on in order to determine what a fighting game is. I have never thought about it in this way because I simply don't care about categorizing Smash with other games.
>FGC definition of fighting game is
Are you claiming that you know what every member of the "FGC" defines a fighting game to be?
>"A game that fits in the same genera as Street Fighter 2".
This is simply your own definition of what a fighting game is. It's pretty hilarious considering I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean.
>If it doesn't have the basics of that game, it's not a fighting game.
Elaborate further. If you can't figure out what I mean by this, define basics. I'm sure it will be hilarious to watch your attempt at this and how many games you, and many others, would typically categorize as a fighting game not fall under your own definition here.
>Arguing otherwise makes you guys look like autistic babies.
Here's where it gets really hilarious. Refer to my post: No one has made a contesting definition (as far as I'm aware at this point; certainly not me) and therefore there is no argument here. You are simply doing exactly as I say in this post.
>If Melee was a fighting game, there wouldn't be a reason to consider them a seperate community.
You're claiming there aren't many variables that go into separating communities. You actually have no evidence, too. Nice try, though.
>You can believe smash is a fighting game. The autism is that you constantly have to be defending your game. Just let other people have fucking opinions.
I've explained above about my perspective on categorizing Melee. You are the only one claiming your definition here to be inarguable/ universal.