>377123065 (You)
>no, it's not the end. just because two objects are moving towards eachother doesn't mean a random third object suddenly gains more momentum. the portals do NOT interact with the cube
there is no third object
the first object is the box
the second object is the room
there are not two rooms, that's where your problem is
Other urls found in this thread:
from the perspective of the room 1a the object c is stationary
from the perspective of the room 1b the object c is in motion
object moving inside 1b has momentum, same object inside 1a doesn't
one object, one room
A is the correct answer
Portal preserve velocity/state of the object, but do not affect it (change)
>Portal preserve velocity/state of the object
which would make B the correct answer.
anyone who argues this is a loser type of geek
The orange portal's point in space is linked to the blue portal. It is effectively just sitting on top of the blue.
Nothing accelerated to clearnthe distance because no distance exists. Space time has simple gone from something like a stretched slinky to a condensed one.
If the portal moved objects then the cube is being moved back in itself within the same frame that the cube hits the portal and the portal is just going to stop moving downward.
>The orange portal's point in space is linked to the blue portal. It is effectively just sitting on top of the blue.
Exactly.
>Nothing accelerated to clearnthe distance because no distance exists
Yes. But the perspective of the exit universe is that the box is moving towards it, and the perspective of the box is that the exit universe is moving towards it.
Speed is realtive. Pick a reference frame for which ever one you want to be correct
what
Those perspectives should simply cancel out and all force is lost. Cube, if we hypothetically let it go through the portal, should just flop to the ground.
That's not possible, as the object is both stationary and moving at the same time relative to the reference of space it is in.
No it won't, Cube is stationary, his velocity is 0
Once the blue portal stops moving so does the cube. This is the only scenario that works with all perspectives.
Why would anything cancel out if there is only one force being applied?
There is nothing to cancel it with.
To cancel it out you would need the exit portal moving at the same speed the entrance portal is moving at, making the hoop test accurate.
What happens in game.
The cube is moving towards the exit portal at the same speed that the entrance portal is moving towards the cube.
So no, it isn't stationary.
It does not matter at what speed moves the blue portal, Cube does not gain velocity from that.
Cube does not move
The two portals exist in the same point if space, so you're correct that it would essentially by a hula-hoop, but it's really more of a jar since the rest of the environment has to go with it.
the fact that people even bother bringing this up proves once and for all that Sup Forums is full of
complete
fucking
retards
>Cube does not move
The universe moving towards the cube is the same as the cube moving.
They are moving towards each other, pick your poison.
>since the rest of the environment has to go with it
Exactly, which is why B makes sense and A doesn't.
you have to spend energy to transport an object from one point in space to another, therefore the cube would fly away and B is correct.
Even if the cube is moving fro the perspective of the blue portal, portals can't tranfer energy to objects.
Sup Forums is also full of people incapable of realizing that properties in physics can disprove a scenario just as much as prove one.
Theory of relativety would mean that the cube can't move without something applying physical force to it, but something has to move, which makes this entire situation impossible to begin with unless space time contorts to fold itself and allow the environment to drop on the cube with the blue portal in which case it would be A, but only due to metaphysics that are only known to exist for a absolutely minute fraction of a millisecond.
The environment only drops as long as the blue portal moves, though. It would be A.
...
damn it, i fucked it up
this is way harder to draw than it is to visualize
Actually, Scenario C is correct. The points of the object on one side of the portal is affected by it's universal frame of reference. What it means is that as the moving portal descends over the object, the object on the other side of the moving portal has momentum. There is a breaking point where the momentum on the exit is greater than the opposing gravitational force in the entry frame of reference. The box will lift itself up into the moving portal because of that momentum. This also means that there is no work done as it's not being pushed, but it is gaining momentum all the same. It's breaking the laws of physics in some respects, but it's also acting in accordance with newtons first law.
Scenario A would never be correct because it breaks newtons first law. Scenario B is not correct because it is treated as a point, not as an object.
>The environment only drops as long as the blue portal moves, though. It would be A.
Irrelevant, as soon as atom 1 of the object passes through, it has exit universe forces acting on it.
Should be the room as is and then it should have a new room sitting on top of the blue portal starting from the point of the orange.
If you stick your dick out a portal you can cockslap people by moving the portal side to side
Ergo, portals can impart movement on things that pass through them
So if a portal moves, does the air simply stay stationary after moving through the portal? Does it push the other air away to make space? Does it create wind cause the portal is scooping the air up?
That means that it either seperates or is pulled by the rest of the cube that is remaining in place and largely outweighs that atom and the effect continues throughout causing an eerie vibration through a motionless cube.
best post
Portals create two reference frames. You can't choose one. They're both true at the same time. The cube is standing still and the blue portal is moving towards it. And the orange portal is standing still and the cube is moving towards it.
Ergo it's going to shoot out the orange portal.
The best part is that because the portal doesn't make the dick itself move, it's not going to wind back before it hits.
Your answer only goes from one reference.
From one, the cube has a room falling on it that stops falling the moment the portal slams into the podium.
>go through a fucking hoollahop that's moving at the same speed you are moving and tell me that you have to come out of the other side just because you went in
You'd already have to be moving faster than the hula hoop to go "through" it you cocksplat
It only means that you have to calculate a really difficult equation for the weight, mass, speed, timeframe, cause it all changes all the time every time a new atom of the structure is going pass the threshold.
It would probably look stationary, and accelerating in a curve momentum as more of the object starts to come out of the portal.
THE PORTAL IS JUST A HOLE
PUT A DIE ON A TABLE
SLAM A TOILET PAPER TUBE DOWN ON IT
DID THE CUBE JUMP OUT?
NO?
GOOD.
so imagine you are faster than the entrance to the holahoop and slower than the exit
it would just be an infinite tunnel for you, like an event hozison of a black hole
>The box will lift itself up into the moving portal because of that momentum.
I don't think it will, actually. It will behave as if it was already in motion.
I also fail to see any appreciable difference between B and what you're saying.
But user of you look through the paper tube it LOOKS like the die is coming straight at you!
Bfags duck during 3D movies.
>the portal doesn't make the dick itself move
Of course it fucking moves. That's the whole point.