Do you risk the 15% chance?

do you risk the 15% chance?

well, Sup Forums?

what do I get out of it

Nothing, but you are no longer an observer. The death from inaction will be on your hands. Make a choice

try this one then faggot

...

...

The probability of all five of them surviving is higher than 15% so I'd pick that.

go to random.org
generate a number between 1 and 100
repeat 4 times
every time the number is less than 15 a person dies

or

run it once
if it's over 15, the guy dies

do this like 100 times, post results and we'll know

>videogames

...

Yes, but only because I want the number to triple, if they were any sort of good folk they wouldn't be laying down tied on the trolley tracks, innit?

1% to insta kill a target

do you really think that just because video games aren't explicitly mentioned that this is not related to video games?

Do I want them to live or die?

You'll get 1.25 dead guys on averge with the 5 person track and .85 dead guys on average with the one guy track.

...

Don't pull the lever. Keep my ass legal and let RNJesus sort them out.

I morally remove myself from the situation and stop giving a shit so I can just pick randomly.

Gonna judge me? You come throw the lever then, faggot. I don't give a fuck. It's not like I went tying people to fucking live trolley tracks.

Hows this for you summerfags

So if i choose to risk the 5 75% guys and they all die.
Will Sup Forums tell me to git gud?

Thats XCOM baby!

I've played enough Fire Emblem to know that 15% is more reliable than 75%

10/10.

>don't pull lever
>save a gorilla and kill a shitty meme at the same time

>having to even THINK about it
>not having 10 LUCK making the choice meaningless

Harambe's value as a martyr is beyond his value as a sentient being

Edgy summerfags are already flooding in, cool

1 of the 6 people have the Jinxed trait.

>save harambe
>nigger parents dont throw their kid into the gorilla pit
>throw him into the lion pit instead
ill save him

.75^4 > .15
Switch, you have 2/3 chance of hitting only one person.

Simba>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Harambe
That's a fact

...

>tfw they're erecting suicide barriers on the golden gate bridge and you feel bad because the aesthetic value of the suicides is greater than the value of the lives of the suicide victims
Why does nobody understand the beauty in this world?

>(((simba)))
nah

>tfw you will never be able to watch people get eaten by lions
fuck my life

ALWAYS

SWITCH

DOORS

Push the lever. Problem solved

They just don't want people killing themselves because people being alive gives more $$$$$ than dead

Say that to my face motherfucker.

If the first person tied to the tracks negates all damage, does it cause the trolley to stop?

Pull the lever and kill that guy

The aesthetic value of wealth is very limited, desu.

...

I refuse to beleieve that guilt can come from inaction unless a prior agreement is made

now this is video games

...

now we're talking

...

...

Daily Reminder

Post more videogames please.

...

fuck off reddit

>1.25 deaths versus 0.85 deaths
I switch the tracks.

23% that everyone on bottom survives. better than the paltry 15, and keeps ypu from pulling the lever to be murderer

Can we get something that is not futa?
F/F would be nice for a change.
That or kemono

>I refuse to beleieve that guilt can come from inaction
You become aware that people are dumping poisonous chemicals into the lake. You can stop this by reporting it to the cops. You do nothing.

Thousands of children over the course of a decade are born with birth defects or even stillborn, and hundreds of families are shattered. Many more people will die early due to cancer. Still think you're not guilty?

>but this is unrealistic?
Is it?

Companies were aware that asbestos caused asbestosis for years, and they did nothing - allowing their workers to get sick and die in exchange for profits. Tobacco companies too. Many such cases.

inb4 "but a prior agreement existed!!!!"
Sure, I'll believe that when you dig up the case law or contract that proves it. "A prior agreement" is not a get out of jail free card for you to pull whenever your stated morals make you uncomfortable. If it's not in writing, and you can't show it, it doesn't exist at all.

>that face
gross

If there's not track they're tied to then what's stopping them rolling out of the trolley's way?

I am still mad

Yea but there's a 24% chance that everyone lives on bottom

now this is what i call a moral dilemna

They're surrounded by someone else's property and so can't move or they'd violate the NAP.

...

...

>Still think you're not guilty?
I'm sure of it

But the ones on the bottom have a higher chance of survival anyway. It is by any metric the superior choice.

Can't argue with that.

Daily reminder that your convictions won't save you from the rope.

Aku wasn't just a threat on earth, his dominion spreaded across the universe. Jack saved a reality from Aku

Right, but you're still risking the chance of killing more than one person on that track where the other track can only kill a maximum of one person.

Jack erased a reality. Heaven is canon in SJ, and everyone who got screwed up will live millions of years in peace there far from aku.

Now those people got thrown in non-existence limbo.

The NAP, obviously

having great knowledge of the NAP I realize the private property likely has mines

Good stuff futa user, keep 'em coming

There is a 68% chance that 2 or more people die on the bottom track. For the top track there is a 0% chance of that happening.

...

>Still think you're not guilty?
That is correct. Was I unclear? I did not cause those deaths. I committed no wrongdoing. Yes, it would be charitable of me to stop it, but I am under no obligation to do so.

I take the same stance on Singer's pond problem.

Now draw your last pathetic card so i can end this thread Sup Forums

An interesting proposition.

If you're going to toggle it at all, you should toggle it quite a few times, hoping to hit an even number, since once you do, all toggling will be beneficial until you hit 1, where it will triple up to 4, then go back to 2, then 1, and oscillate. The number of toggles you need to hit an even number, for n=initial people on the track.
1- 1 (4)
2- 2 (22)
3- 1 (10)
4- 2 (40)
5- 1 (16)
6- 2 (58)
Etc.

So if you have an arbitrary number of toggles, you can kill an expected value of 2.333... people. If you expect to get less than t

you'd get at least one death either way

If you guys witnessed someone getting murdered, would you seriously not call the police because it makes you "no longer an observer?"
You realize how messed up this whole idea of never getting involved is, right? It's straight-up chinese logic.

>but I am under no obligation to do so.
You think this because you are a retard who objects to the notion of duty based solely on the fact that if you accepted its self-evident existence you would have to face the fact that you are incapable of living up to its demands.

It's okay not to fulfil your duties user. People do. It's hard to be good. But you have to try to count.

Sad indeed, but sacrifices had to be made. The universe may forget them, but Jack won't ever

what if i choose to derail the train?

>i will pick the greater evil because it doesn't put me in the state of breaking the law (read: not obeying letters on a piece of paper) because i haven't developed a strong moral backbone
Why are americans so mentally cucked like this?

Trap furries are the best furries. Futa is second. Vanilla is boring.

...

Who would write "yiff in hell" in a furry reality? Is that not like saying "sex in hell" there? Is there some kind of puritan Christian mom writing on bathroom stalls?

What about yuri?

Nope.

There is a class of professional ingrates infesting our society, and we all agree these people think differently than us, don't understand the ties that bind us.

These are the ancaps and the lolbertarians - the neo-liberals in the halls of power destroying our communities in the pursuit of profits not because they are evil, but because they literally don't even realise what they're throwing away.

It's not evil to kill your enemies.

>implying western society is worth "duties"
It's collapsing user

Wish I could draw porn as well as this guy.

Then you'd see some real perverted shit.

I'm talkin' shit that'd make gagged centaur dickgirls being hung upside down in fetish gear and tortured while a religious cult forces women to have sex with them look tame.

Upon reflection it really isn't worth the effort just for a tug though.

Your Blue eyes Ultimate Dragon a shit.

Maybe it's the future where genetic modification has become a thing.

I object to the notion of duty based on the fact that I never agreed to it. Under what principle am I compelled to such follow such a thing? There are situations where it's implicit, but this is not one of them.

Then describe it with words. I can fill in the rest

what if I unironically agree

To be fair that bug is really big

Statistically unsound to pull the lever at all

multi-track drifting