Fan remake exists

>Fan remake exists
>Company sends a DMCA to take it down
>Fan creators say "no"

What can the company that sent the DMCA actually do?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=qvM6Mg0VtO0
arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/02/police-raided-me-says-leaker-who-tried-selling-next-gen-xbox-dev-kit/
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2089138/Megaupload-shut-Police-raid-reveals-Kim-Dotcoms-multimillion-dollar-wealth.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

They can sue. They just send a C&D to show that they can but they really don't want to be bothered to.

/thread

Game companies are in the business of making money. Sending a DMCA costs money. You gotta pay lawyers. They will typically only do this if the project is either making money without their permission(which allows grounds them to sue for an estimate amount) or if the fan project could possibly eclipse an upcoming release(working on their own HD remake and don't want the game out there for free which could hurt their sales and cost them money.)

Most freeware developers won't fight a DMCA because it costs money and they weren't taking anything in to pay a lawyer. But there are sometimes when the developer has dumped so much time and effort into a project that they refuse to let it go and will pull from their own accounts so their work can see the light of day.

The C&D would actually stick if the company can prove that the freeware dev is distributing their work. But to my knowledge the guy making this remake remade all the sprites so he does have a leg to stand on. More than likely they have no plans for a Metroid 2 remake in the near future and don't feel like paying the lawyers to have the case get presented before a judge.

>They can sue
But how? The police will suddenly confiscate your PC and check if you did a game using some company's characters? Isn't it kinda dumb?

DMCAs are directed at sites which host the infringing content.

Oh look, it's this thread again.

>Creating a game using the company's franchise with the same sprites and music and characters
>Somehow the company is bad for taking the game down
If you can do a game from scratch, just make your own game instead of stealing. I really felt sorry for this guy. Spent 10 years making a good 2D Metroid game expecting a company would be okay with this or recognize his talent and let him work with them.

>gorilions of Super Metroid romhacks are fine
>this somehow isn't
"They have to protect their IP" my ass.

>Waited a literal decade and for this infringing fan-game to be finished and out before issuing a C&D, so everyone still got to play it

>BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWW why is Nintendo so EVIL!?!!11!?!1?

Really makes you think.

>HHHMMMmmmmm~ Nintendo-sama your cock is so big and juicy~~~~
>Don't worry, I'll defend your honor on anonymous imageboards for free, like the good little whore I am!

>stealing
lmao

Meanwhile

>game could be infinitely improved thanks to patches which he was willing to do for free, and new content patches were on the way
>"nope you can't do that because improving a game is wrong"- you

You have to maintain it every now and again, otherwise it becomes harder to fight when explicitly competitive infringement occurs.

Just like when they tear down homeless communities and kick out squatters in countries that have adverse possession laws. Sure, they're not hurting anyone at that point and it seems a bit callous, but if you do nothing a few years down the line it's not going to be yours any more.

Everyone does what Nintendon't

Taking something without permission is stealing, user.

A crime is a crime is a crime is a crime.

If you kill a child and stuff her in your car, are the police going to let you keep your car? I think not.

Furthmore, as you have already demonstrated that younare willing to infringe against copyrights,whose to say you don't have other illegal Nintendo assets on your machine? Other ROMhacks.

Shit, who's to say you don't have CP on that machine? Ethically, Nintendo should be able to plant it on your PC and frame you. Afterall you don't care about their property, why should they care about yours.

That's trademarks, dimbulb.

Calm down Hammurabi, your shit got outdated ages ago.

>Valve likes getting money for doing fucking nothing

What a shock! It's not like that is basically the entirety of their business model these days or anything.

Nintendo, on the other hand, actually does like producing things themselves and they like to control the IP that they work so hard at establishing. For them that is more important than being a lazy jew.

"Being tighly kniit with your community is bad because of some nonsense about jews"

"DMCA-ing FREE projects is fine because I'm a rabid fucking fanboy"

Because remaking the same game for the past ten years isn't lazy as fuck

Rabid fanboys are the ones who believe just because they are a rabid fanboy they are now entitled to some sort of ownership over someone else's property and can use it as they see fit.

Well, they aren't and they can't. Fan "ownership" is a crock of shit.

Gee, sorry for believing in common sense rather than a bunch of lobbied IP laws.

What point are you trying to make?

>common sense

Fuck off.

It's not your fucking shit, it's as simple as that. Doesn't matter how much you love it how much you want it, it's still not your shit. Stop acting like a spoilt two year old.

You should be able to make whatever you want if you're not profiting off it. There is not a single argument you can make against this that doesn't involve quoting some unreasonable lobbied paragraph.

You're a moron. Impact on market value is one of the key factors in determining whether a case of copyright infringement is fair use or not. Not profiting won't protect you from shit and rightly so. This helps the "little guy" as much, if not more so, than the "big guy".

Its a fan remake of a game made by valve... hosted on a website owned by valve.

Point is companies like valve don't care what people do with their IP, by putting the game on steam they are even supporting the developers (while making some shekels themselfs)

>Point is companies like valve don't care what people do with their IP

So if I developed Half Life 3 myself you think Valve wouldn't give a shit? Not only that, they'd happily sell it for me?

Somehow I don't think so.

Valve is profiting off of it so of course they'll allow it.

AMR2 getting a DMCA is a sign that Nintendo is working on a new Metroid game or at least has plans to at some point

they had no reason to care about it otherwise

The difference is that with Valve, they basically sanction it with the ability for the HL2 engine to play mods, and having the Source Development Kit available for free for such things.

Nintendo has no such equivalency.

If you wouldn't call it HL3 I am sure they wouldn't bat an eye. I have seen countless fanmade episodes that continue the story of HL2.

>sonic fan makes good fan game
>gets hired by sega to make an official game

>metroid fan makes a good fan game
>nintendo threatens him with thousands of dollars in lawsuits or imprisonment

lul

you've made this thread at least twice already, stop it

Do you also support lobbyists extending copyrights far past their dates? Soon Disney will make it 120 years or some shit.
Do you understand that public domain MUST exist and it's a huge determent to creative of all mankind if there is no public domain anymore?

metroid 2 is still sold on the virtual console, so a remake of it threatens people buying it from them for 4 dollars.
that is the whole reason. that is how petty nintendo is.

they wouldn't let you call it half-life 3, but otherwise they probably wouldn't care.

Copying something is not taking something, tripfag-kun

The DMCA is the law, not what you "send".

>people going on about their amazing fan project before it's done

Epic repost bro! Fucking nice dude.

>What is pre-release marketing?

How dare game companys advertise a game before it is released.

Please read my post again Mr. Replies-Without-Reading-Properly

Did we already forget what Sega did to Streets of Rage Remake?

youtube.com/watch?v=qvM6Mg0VtO0

The romhacks didn't garner a fuckload of attention.

That's because Sega has a shit ton more to lose then Nintendo. Nintendo can fuck around and sue people all they want and it doesn't effect them.

story?

That's not a good thing. When will nintentards wake the fuck up?

When they will stop buying their overpriced consoles and pieces of plastic for $90

>But how? The police will suddenly confiscate your PC and check if you did a game using some company's characters?

no
they look at whatever website is hosting the content, then they threaten a suit to make whoever is hosting it shut it down.

kek

They can't, it's fair usage.

then how is it any different when Nintendo doesn't let modders call their games after one of Nintendo's IPs?

Fair use is an affirmative defense, until a court rules it to be fair use it's copyright infringement. Going to court to argue fair use involves something called the discovery process whereby parties can request relevant items and information be shared. Failure to comply with the discovery process is considered contempt of court and sanctions can include such things as being fined, jailed, a summary judgement against you, etc., etc.

In other words, they can.

Yay! Another bot thread to add to my imagefilters!

It's a possibility

arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/02/police-raided-me-says-leaker-who-tried-selling-next-gen-xbox-dev-kit/
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2089138/Megaupload-shut-Police-raid-reveals-Kim-Dotcoms-multimillion-dollar-wealth.html

The FBI and law enforcement are media companies's attack dogs.

Considering it's a remake of a game and not just a fan game it is infringing copyright. If he made a metroid fan game, with it's own world and story he'd have a better case. That being said i doubt Nintendo will sue.

nintendo doesn't just care about names, they care about people copying characters and gameplay elements from their IP. that said i don't know how the people developing """mother 4""" haven't been sued to death yet, perhaps because it's an even deader IP than metroid.

Some people were making a Streets of Rage remake. Sega issued a DMCA takedown. Pretty easy to figure out from the context, mate.
They've also done other scummy shit like DMCA'd completely inoffensive YouTube videos that were more popular than theirs so their own game trailers would be higher in search results.

>Could have supported the Dev and sold out on virtual console for 3* the price of the original
>Shuts it down instead
They could have made money off it. REEeee

>validating the unsanctioned use of your intellectual property

Maybe he might have asked for permission beforehand? At least the guys looking to do a Metal Gear Solid remake had enough sense and courtesy to do that and when Konami told them "No" they knew not to waste their time on something that was not going to be allowed.

Almost every developer in the industry now has said that gamers are a bunch of entitled brats and frankly they are correct. You don't have the right to infringe on someone else's copyright. It doesn't matter if you are a fan or if you aren't making any money from it or anything, you just don't have that right. And that isn't really that bad a thing either.

According to the Video Game Attorney (how much stock you put into him, I've no clue), it can bankrupt people, ruin their credit and destroy lives.

Apparently, again this is just what he's said, there's a lot of cases of Fangames getting shut down like this without the C&D being sent, they're just sued straight up and it doesn't come to light because they get locked into an NDA as part of the legal proceedings.

Who knows how true it is, but he's got some experience in it and it does sound like playing with fire.

>there's a lot of cases of Fangames getting shut down like this without the C&D being sent, they're just sued straight up
Like what?

>You should be able to make whatever you want if you're not profiting off it. There is not a single argument you can make against this that doesn't involve quoting some unreasonable lobbied paragraph.

I release my game in the west, it's well recieved, I make enough money that I can think about publishing it worldwide. I start negotiating contracts.

After some deliberation, I decide I want to sell my game in Korea.

You do a free patch that translates my game to Korean. You do it purely out of love for my game, you distribute it for free over Mega, no-one makes a single cent from it.

But you've now fucked me out of selling my game in Korea. I'll lose a bunch of potential sales at a minimum.

>Do you also support lobbyists extending copyrights far past their dates? Soon Disney will make it 120 years or some shit.

You don't know what you're talking about, but I don't. They should crack down on that shit, 10years or even 20 years, more than enough to turn a profit and then everyone can use it.

>Do you understand that public domain MUST exist and it's a huge determent to creative of all mankind if there is no public domain anymore?

I agree, but that doesn't mean that "So long as there's no profit, it's fine." is true.

That's the thing, he didn't give examples and they're apparently wrapped up in NDA. So it's literally "Take my word for it.

Also: If I make a GAME and then have no sequel for some time, then you make GAME2 as a fan sequel, if I don't stop that, you're fucking around with my ability to make a proper sequel. It gets muddied up with your efforts in searches, marketing, knowledge etc.

They're making a FF7 remake right now, imagine if someone else came out and released a "Fanpatch" FF7 remake that was just the original FF7 with better graphics. They'd get the absolute shit sued out of them because it'd fuck with their ability to sell their vision of the FF7 remake.

>Apparently, again this is just what he's said, there's a lot of cases of Fangames getting shut down like this without the C&D being sent, they're just sued straight up and it doesn't come to light because they get locked into an NDA as part of the legal proceedings.
how many fan projects are there that could've gotten hit by this instead of getting c&d and become canceled publicly without any real given reason
the only one i can think of is project m(eme) brawl mod, it became pretty much a direct competition to smash four when it came to tournament play
it seems like an extreme case that wouldn't really affect most basement dwellers who tinker with engines while eating mom's spaghetti