Bandicoot confirmed for 1440p 30 FPS

gametransfers.com/crash-bandicoot-trilogy-n-sane-will-run-at-1440p-and-30fps-on-ps4-pro/

That has got to be bullshit.

BREAK OUT THE BUTTER

t. autist

What's the framerate on the original?

Jesus christ you're such a whiny faggot

How fast is the switch port going to run?

To think that I was actually excited for it.

Hopefully once it does poorly SCEA makes the right decision and ports it @ 60FPS to PC

stop being so entitled
just be thankful we're allowed to play it at all!

60fps
>sonybros literally cant even run a touched up 21yo game at its original framerate

Graphics > FPS
I'd rather play HZ:D than some shitty looking PC game that runs at 1000 FPS

>unironically word-filtering sonygers

so this is the power of the ps4
JUST

JUST

>entitled
There's that retarded word again. If someone's asking for your money for their product you can be as "entitled" about it as you want.

>30 fps
>ps4 pro
>2017
fucking kek

He's false flagging user

Well that's 360 more p than I was expecting.

ebic falseflag

>I'd rather play some SJW movie game than an actual good game
We know sonybro

>I enjoy being cucked and paying for sjw propaganda

As long as it's above 30 on a 1080p TV then I don't give a fuck

But why, most people have 1080p displays.

1080/60 would have made more sense.

You're full of shit, the originals were 30 too. 60fps barely existed on ps1 and N64, at least not in 3d games.

>enjoy your shitty ports and exclusives no one gives 2 shits about

It's only 30.

120 fps or nothing

>60 fps
>not

The Pro literally can't reach 60 in most games because of the shit CPU

>the sad state of consoles in 2017

All you people do is complain.

the 3DS is 240P always locked in at 30FPS and not once have I heard a complaint, in fact, it sells like hotcakes even to this day.

lmao

Factually incorrect. PS1 had more 60fps 3D titles than PS4, even counting all the remasters on the latter.

What the fuck are you talking about?

Its like a shitty handheld from 2011 is held to different standards than a home console from 2013 and its upgraded version from 2016.

>locked to 30 fps

WRONG, Monster Hunter 3U runs at 60 fps.

What the fuck
Is 1080p 60fps an option? What's even the point of going to such a high resolution if the framerate suffers as a result?

>pro mode on: 1440p 30fps
>pro mode off: 1080p 30fps

60fps thanks to the downgraded grafix

Higher resolution only needs more GPU power, which the Pro has plenty. Higher framerate however, requires more from the CPU.

60 is the minimum, the baseline. 60 is acceptable, it's playable without getting nausea. It should be at LEAST this much on every console release since 2010.
No wonder console gamers are the laughing stock of the community as a whole.

you are a fucking retard. please never post again.

The game doesn't even look that good, what kind of shit optimization are they doing?

...

I'm not really too bothered about fps honestly, but I see a lot of people defending this and saying that it could be a gameplay option since the originals were 30 FPS, not too sure what to make of that.

0 fps on PC :^)

No optimization at all.

That wasn't even what the other user said you defensive cunt.
Having more 60fps titles than the N64 doesn't mean shit if it's 4 to 2.

>If someone's asking for your money for their product
You almost got away with it, ACfag, but then you had to out yourself like always.

Haha wow so this is the power of the all mighty PS4
Meanwhile the switch - a fucking handheld - is running arms at 60fps and it looks miles better than this pile of shit.

Rip Sony, thanks for ruining the game industry after the ps2

I don't know man.

I was playing the N64 for some Ocarina of Time with 24fps. Still pretty playable as I remember.

This. Pro is more of a res-upscaler than anything else. Play the same game but with higher (native) res.

>consolefags holding back the industry yet again

Wow so shocking.

They really went for the memey 1440p instead of targeting 60 FPS? Isn't this a complete remake? I would understand if it was just a remaster and there's nothing they could do about the frame lock.

>30 fps for a fucking platformer in 2017 is somehow acceptable
What the fuck is wrong with them

Well Pro has been lauded as "4K machine". Pretty sure it would make normalfags crazy seeing their game is in 1080p

id rather it run at 60fps at 1080p.

Anyone that's not tech iliterate would.

But he is correct

Learn to read

who gives a fuck?
it'll be like 8k fucking 256fps on pc anyway

Don't make me say it

And this is exactly why everyone hates you, sonyfags.

Your console cant even produce pc-comparable graphics, yet you boast about sony games being superior (even if they are multiplat)
Your 3rd party devs cant into artstyle and only release the same looking shit year after year.
You defend 30 FPS instead of 60 FPS.

242425 fps indie shovelware is still indie shovelware
Keep your shit opinions to yourself dumb PCbro

30 FPS with no framedrops is great

WE'RE GONA MAKE TOAST

Originals were 30 FPS (or even lower if you were playing PAL version) so I wouldn't mind this too much if I was going to buy the remaster.
The general art direction is a bigger disappointment for me

so 30 fps instead of 60 fps isnt a shit opinion? Dayum, you sure showed me!

>with no framedrops is great
>>>

It's not locked at 30fps tho.

Smash and Wooly World run at 60. There are more but I can't be assed to look.

A good 30 fps game is still better than 100% of the crap that comes out on PC.

> PCfag thinking "the industry" wouldn't go completely bankrupt if it only catered to "MUH SPECS" crowd

>it's another remake of a classic platformer, but this time at 30fps
At least tell me that the motion blur isn't as shit as in Ratchet and Clank.

Nobody is defending 30 fps, it's just that nobody is dropping a game or shit smearing a game because of 30 fps.

There is nothing wrong with 30fps. 60 is preferable, but there is nothing wrong with 30. It's only a crime if it drops below 30 and can't remain stable.

>but more precise movements
Minuscule difference that only matters in online multiplayer games.

> this time

Are you implying the original was 60?

>Im okay with eating shit if other people are eating it as well.

More frames per second means a higher rate of shit the CPU has to figure out how to send to the GPU. That said, I'm not sure how much trouble that is for the CPU. Better fire up CAM and start experimenting with different resolutions and compare diffences in CPU usage.

>says he as he plays Shower With Your Dad Simulator and the newest early access survival game

>there are no good indie games meme
This needs to stop. I am not only talking about Steam, either.

>people having such low standards that they're okay with a remaster of a 20 year old game not running 60 fps

Nevermind the fact that some of the animations and effects in the game look really off

>going for resolution instead of fps
???????

You first

It just means they couldn't get it to run at 1080p 60 fps. It's better than nothing I guess

Then 900p 60fps.

im sure our petitions to get it on pc at 60fps will really stick it to sony

activision owns the rights. They do whatever they want with it.

>There is nothing wrong with 30fps

How did you generate a post that writes exactly what a complete retard would say?

SSFIV runs at 60 as well.

Games aren't CPU intensive period unless it's some strange fringe case.

The GPU on the other hand they just keep adding shit until the frame rate is unacceptable.

The fuck why? I would preferred 1080p/60 over 1440p/30.

Nice to know. So what's wrong with that exactly?