Leave E3 to me
Leave E3 to me
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
NO NO ITS OVER. UBISOFT FUCKING WON
A minute in and they win. Amazing.
This actually made me smile.
gg yves
S-Shut up nintenbro!
Game looks good, who would have thought Sup Forums BTFO once again...
>Some of you guys are cool. Don't come to E3 tomorrow.
RIP CODY MR NINTENDO EDGEWORTH
IT'S REAL AND HE'S FUCKING WRONG
We are witnessing the day Ubisoft and Nintendo won with the same game.
Nintendo lost.
How do we stop ubisoft bros...
Nintendo just won E3.
Holy fuck.
God fucking damn I want ubisoft to burn up and die
Ubisoft won. everyone can go home now.
>Turn based
No thanks.
IT'S A FUCKING XCOM CLONE
>turn-based
Nintendo ripping off XCOM now.
Mario XCOM. You can't make this shit up.
That music is Grant Kirkhope right?
Wow, two franchises I don't want anything to do with, making a game I don't want. Sure won E3.
PWaahahahaaahahaha
A game truely fit for Nintenbros
So it's baby's first Xcom
Great, this means no time will be wasted with this in the Nintendo presentation.
It doesn't actually look that bad.
I would have loved to explore a fully 3d Mushroom Kingdom on an adventure. I don't even mind the Rabbids things. But come one, a turn based game? Seriously? It's 2017. This is like making a cake and then blowing your nose on it.
>Super Mario RPG = Baby's first RPG
>Mario Kart = Baby's first Racer
>Super Smash Bros = Baby's first Fighting game
You seeing the pattern yet?
>he thinks this won't be in their presentation too
Some people enjoy XCOM, FFT and Disgaea you loser
I thought it was bound to be shit
but now that i see the gameplay, i want it.
Someone got a webm from them "shooting" the audience already?
This is actually pathetic.
xcom: mario edition
I didn't know I wanted this
Oh shit that looks fun as fuck. Do you think there will be a hard mode?
This making shitty casual versions of real games meme needs to stop.
SONYNTENDO WINS AGAIN
What makes it casual, the art style?
The fact it doesn't take a fucking age to transition between weapons firing and the tactical view?
I mean you could just not use the rabbid characters in your party if you hate them and just kill the enemy rabbids
Well that's what XCOM 2012 was already so
>Ubisoft announced this trash instead of Nintendo
Well at least i won't have to sit through that tommorow
>Sup Forums suddenly loves Rabbids
NintendoGAF was a mistake.
It's fucking incredible. They will literally eat Nintendo's shit.
>lmao xcom is shit
>whoa Mario XCOM day one buy
It's not Sup Forums.
Ubisoft marketers are hitting us HARD. Most of the comments that are "X-Com" or "honestly fun and cute" are marketers.
>yfw Nintendo has been saving e3 from mediocrity for a while now
That it has no depth and no learning curve while being a mash up of the two most casual game franchises, Mario and Rabbits.
Don't even pretend that there will be more to it like Nintendo fans always love to do.
mario xcom gee thx
They're trying to sway opinions due to the leak fuck up from earlier last month.
Oh, you already played it?
youtube.com
miyamoto has fucking lost it
You must be the biggest retard on this board if you actually believe that.
It was literally xcom combat.
ANTI NINTENDO SHILLS ALREADY SPREADING SALT ITT KEK
But did Daimon help with the development?
It's funny though because part of the leak included their strategy for consumers and there's an entire phase of dedicated to convincing gamers to support this.
If the sentiments were genuine, the comments would be about SRPGs in general.
Look at some of these posts. There's no way there aren't unironic Ubisoft marketers here right now.
Can't you just accept that opinions are a thing?
It will be even more casual than code name steam.
Enjoy your competitive Mario Kart and Pokemon though. Don't forget the break every hour like Nintendo recommends in their in game pop ups
ITT:
>They like something I don't t-they are marketers!
>implying that stopped any of those games from being great
Opinions ARE a thing.
But right now at this second? Ubisoft has paid people to come here and astroturf.
>defending Rabbids
Fuck off shills.
Is being better than most of the "mature" versions of those genres the pattern?
>competitive Pokemon
Oh, man you have no idea what you're talking about if you think that is simple and shallow, I bet you think SMT is deeper than Pokemon too.
Looked fun and confirmed that parallel universes are indeed canon to Mario
Pokemon has too much RNG to be truly competitive.
But it has rabbids and mario so it's super simple casual shit.
I love it. It's amazing how autistic nintendo fans are to get competitive over a game that has less depth than rock paper scissors.
>allowing all this swearing from the south park game
Why is ubisoft so edgy?
>>Super Mario RPG = Baby's first RPG
If you mean the Paper Mario series, you'd be right as great as those games were, but Super Mario RPG is not "baby's first RPG"
Sure, the three times world champion just got very lucky three years in a row.
But seriously, it doesn't have more luck involved than card games like MTG, actually that's why I started playing it, I got tired of buying magic cards.
>card games
>competitive
>been playing the Front Mission series all day
>see this
You know what? I'll accept it.
Competitive Pokemon is a joke compared to any other competitive video game and that's a fact.
Why?
It requires no mechanical skill or reflexes.
So that's the only skill that matters in videogames? ok
What skills are there in Pokemon? Guessing?
knowing what moves to use and knowing advantages of pokemon types. nigga if you go against a pokemon competition winner and win then you can talk shit.
Unlike real competitive games most of the competitive aspect in Pokemon comes from the preparation and not the actual battle. You prepare your tools but there is hardly any mind game to use the tools with.
>knowing that water beats fire is a skill
if that is your argument then Pokemon competitive scene is a joke lmao
Planning, considering available options and weighing risk and reward in each case, if it was just guessing and luck then there wouldn't be player that consistently perform good.
it's not, that's a shit poster and the reason we need IDs
>Most of the comments that are "X-Com" or "honestly fun and cute" are marketers.
citation needed
>unironically wanting identification on an anonymous imageboard
You have to go back.
Imagine a game of chess, you need to learn thousands upon thousands of situations to enter the mind game of a professional match. In Pokemon you have 5 options at any given time of which at best two options are viable at any given situation. It's pathetic to say the least.
Best Switch game of the year
Even Ubisoft is better at making Mario games than Nintendo
Someone post a pic of the lead dev that was so proud he was crying.
That was a sweet moment.
You're right, I shouldn't take away people right to shit post, it's just that I can't find any place for actual videogame discussion, sorry.
We should go further and make it so everybody must have usernames and passwords and also add an upvote and downvote system
The gameplay is being defended here, no the rabbids.
>muh shills
how can one man be so wrong
WHY WOULD YOU DO THIS
JUST
WHY
This is a disgrace. Nobody asked for this, needed this, nobody even wanted it. This will be a terrible game.
youtube.com
Whoa, look at this hardcore competitive game. Only Mario Kart can compete with this depth.
Why will it be a terrible game?
>but nin
rabbids sold the best on PC actually
>Rabbids
No explanation needed
There is explanation needed.The game could be great and still have Rabbids
Actually looks pretty interesting.
>strap a Mario hat onto a pile of feces
>"its actually good you guise"
Toddlers, everyone. Or just ubisoft shills. I really can't tell.
Go away, shill.