Real exclusives. Not timed exclusive or console exclusive. No multiplats or remakes

>Real exclusives. Not timed exclusive or console exclusive. No multiplats or remakes.
>None of that diversity crap
>New info to get hyped about instead of shit we've known about about since last e3

Am I hoping for too much with them?

>>None of that diversity crap
Maybe not, but they DO pander to SJWs.
>inb4 multi-paragraph reply on why this is actually okay and totally not SJW pandering

They quite literally need to announce one (1) good, new game to redeem all of E3 as a whole.

Even if they just announce Sm4sh for Switch, that'll bring more hype than all the other presentations.

If they announce Metroid, that'll cover them for TWO full E3's.

Why is it bad if they pander too them?

Tell me pic related is not real. What the fuck happened to my America, land of the tits?

That's the localization team

The switch is region free now. If they censor anything I'll just import the uncensored version.

You should all do the same

Because they don't buy games.
Besides, OP brought it up first.

>>Real exclusives.
What on earth else would they announce? They don't have any 3rd party support at all anymore

they aren't the ones giving them money

That kind of pandering is completely harmless since we got zr instead of another boring ass bikini costume.

They ruin the vydia industry

It is real
No english subs

>its another "the censored version is actually better you guise" post

They could literally show a close up of Miyamoto spreading his ass cheeks and spraying shit all over Reggie and drones will still say they won.

I want Ninty to put some actual effort this time. Take risks. Hopefully we get a new Metroid, Donkey Kong, F-Zero, or even Pikmin.

Learn Japanese or at least to read it.

>Real exclusives. Not timed exclusive or console exclusive. No multiplats or remakes.

Explain to me how this is a good thing without involving spite.

>Not timed exclusive or console exclusive. No multiplats or remakes.

Considering this is 90% of their library, yes, you're expecting too much.

Do you have proof of this?

Explain.

It is true in this case, however.

>make a shitty XCOM clone with Disgaea's bounce mechanic
>also prominently and proudly features the Proto-Minions
What the fuck were they thinking

Games tailored for a specific set of hardware have always been of higher quality than multiplats generally.

It isn't.

>Give up on your country, there is no hope left

Doesn't sound like such a bad idea anymore

>Censorship is good

>they DO pander to SJWs
Their localization team does, but we /regionfree/.

It means it's on Nintendo in the end to continue the life of their console. Meaning focusing on making great games to sell the console. And funding games to be made.

Just look at what happened to the vita after Sony abandoned it. A huge disappointment, the vita could of been one of the best consoles ever made but when the parent company gives up on it no one is gonna develop for it.

Flawless counterargument, I give up.

Are you seriously asking for proof of feminists not-buying anime fanservice games?

So... wagglan = higher quality?

Because that's pretty much the only aspect where this could be true.

Nintendo's exclusives have been really good recently.

Learning a new language means giving up on your country?

What are you American?

Generally you're supposed to present an argument first.

>joycon
>waggling
There is serious potential for the joycon to be really good for immersion with phone level accel and gyro and the HD Rumble, but there need to be use cases that demonstrate that.

There's more to games than graphics.

Would they have been worse if they weren't exclusive?
The Vita was DOA, didn't take any abandonment. How about Nintendo makes a console that's worth buying without the threat of "if you don't buy this, you don't get this game"?
It's wagglan. Deal with it.
While true, that's an empty statement.

That's Nintendo pandering to Soccer moms because they somehow bought a idol simulator for little Jimmy. Nintendo of America has been censoring games for decades to avoid any sort of controversy and show a squeaky clean image. Its not SJW pandering.

Yeah, the only language practical enough to learn here is spanish. Unless you're a disgusting weeb

>its a every game should be multiplat commie
Competition is required for this industry to exist.

No, it is SJW pandering. Their localization team is full of feminists.
Just because they censored things back in the day, when none of us had internet and couldn't find the changes, doesn't make it okay to do it today.

No new games, you hope too much, I'm going to enjoy the salt generated from the nintendo e3 digital event this year.

(spoiler) I actually won't (/spoiler)

I'm going to be saying I told you so in a few hours though.

Don't you get more competition between systems when they all have to stand on their own merits, instead of locking off their ecosystem?

I have almost 300 hours in Splatoon and I could not be less interested in Arms.
To me its pretty much "We Want the Wii Casuals Back: The Game"

SJWS don't buy the games they advocate for.

In return it alienates the core base while simultaneously making a flop. Normally this wouldn't be bad because they would learn to not ignore their demographic.

This is not the case with SJW agenda games however for some reason the developers going down this route always double down on failure. Continuing down this path makes vydia not a profitable industry and makes companies shy away from getting into the industry.

SJW agenda propaganda in vydia is a bad move on all fronts

No, nobody with a brain buys hardware without software.

That's not what I claimed. Deliberately misunderstanding my argument won't help you.

The vita had great promise and has some of the best used to be exclusives and has a lot of great games ported to it.
Long story short it had an incredible library in its early years

The games Are what's worth buying a Nintendo console for. I don't see the point you're trying to make here... Seems kinda dumb desu

Your argument is built on the retarded idea that any company wouldn't use the easiest way to sell their hardware, this exists on the PC market too with things like PhysX and the Crisis 2 Nvidia conspiracy. The point I'm making is exclusivity of software or features is something that will always exist.

>Would they have been worse if they weren't exclusive?
Yes, because Nintendo wouldn't have had total creative control and we wouldn't have had experimentation with wii u features in Splatoon, some of which made their way to the Switch, others of which didn't.

>How about Nintendo makes a console that's worth buying
Call me a faggot, but I like the Switch so far. It needs games and an OS update, but I really think it could carve out a separate niche in the market.

>It's wagglan.
It's really not; I was pleasantly surprised by the responsiveness in Arms and spla2n and if Arms is any indication, Nintendo will support non-motion, too.

There are apps for phones that make language easy to learn.

But hey At least you guys elected Trump. Thats pretty cool. Gotta give you guys respect for saving yourselves

>The vita had great promise and has some of the best used to be exclusives and has a lot of great games ported to it.
So why did it never take off? Because none of that says "abandoned" to me.
> The games Are what's worth buying a Nintendo console for.
So, if the games were available elsewhere, the nintendo consoles wouldn't be worth buying anymore?

In other words, if you're buying into Nintendo hardware, you need exclusives so the purchase wasn't pointless?

With Switch having no region lock there's a higher chance of simultaneous translation, a simultaneous translation has a much better chance of not being cucked, you can look at stuff like Nier Automata and Fire Emblem Echoes for examples, this isn't always true but it decreases the cucking significantly, I think it's because the original developers get to oversee the games during a simultaneous translation and can tell the cucks to cuck off but when the translation is a delayed heavily the cucks cuck it the cuck cuckp.

>you need software for your hardware
Baffling isn't it?

No, it's SJW pandering, but of a different form. Why do you think this board busted a nut when they got rid of region locking?

Arms will live or die on its patches and community. I had a lot of fun playing it with friends, but not as much playing it alone.

I was talking about video game in general, not just anime like games.

>SJWS don't buy the games they advocate for.

Proof of that, user?

okay well SJWs certainly wouldn't be interested in something like TMS so there's literally no reason to pander to them. Only thing it does is piss off the actual audience

>None of that diversity crap
i'd rather have black people than rabbids

>Your argument is built on the retarded idea that any company wouldn't use the easiest way to sell their hardware
My argument is that this is anti-consumer. You're defending a practice that fucks you in the ass.
> this exists on the PC market too with things like PhysX and the Crisis 2 Nvidia conspiracy.
whataboutism won't change this either.
> Yes, because Nintendo wouldn't have had total creative control
Wait - how come? Porting a game doesn't change the game.
> and we wouldn't have had experimentation with wii u features in Splatoon, some of which made their way to the Switch, others of which didn't.
Since the features are apparently not mandatory, they're not a reason against porting.
> Call me a faggot, but I like the Switch so far.
If it can stand on its own, then why do games have to be restricted on it? Why not let people on other systems have fun with them as well?
Do you think software only exists if no one else gets to have it as well?

Because Sony is retarded when it comes to competing in a market and gave up when the 3Ds got too popular. Instead of developing a cheaper version of the console and lowering the price.

Yeah if Nintendo games where sold on a different console I would still buy them. But that's not the case they make a console that their developers are comfortable with creating on. In turn their games have higher quality. I also don't see them getting our of the console market any time.

Gone Home's numbers were pretty awful, despite the entire SJW media scene praising it and GG not even existing yet. Look at the praise for that nutjob Wu's shitty PS1 tier game.

If SJW's could make games, they wouldn't be trying to form cancers on writing and localization teams.

Fuck off I shouldn't of given your shitty post a paragraph because your just gonna read the opening sentance

Not entirely, I really like the Switch's core gimmick, it's something I've wanted for a while, exclusives only really matter on Nintendo hardware because for the most part they are the only company that puts out worthwhile exclusives, now Nintendo exclusives aren't the only exclusives worth owning but in general the Playstations best exclusives are the games not made by Sony.

Obviously the ideal world would be PC and a Nintendo handheld in similar vein to the Switch, but Playstation and Microsoft still insist they are of value.

>My argument is that this is anti-consumer.
Well then you are a fucking idiot. You think the ideal market is one with zero competition, no competition means no innovation and no innovation means no interest. It is something that literally can not exist.

Look at games that pander to SJW media. They don't sell nearly as well as games that stick to what's tried and true. Do you have an example of Sjw games that sold incredibly well

Give me a new Kirby that's actually good or I riot
Hopefully Kirby fightan

Loath as I am to defend an anticompetitive practice, I like that Nintendo ties games to its hardware because it encourages other developers to work with the new features of the hardware, too. Yes, this can fail disastrously with the waggle, or like the Wii U, when they decided not to show up, but at least a Nintendo exclusive promises me some kind of uniqueness, as opposed to "you could play this on your PC with a USB controller, but we won't let you".

I do love when games are cross-platform, but I like a Nintendo that can stand on its hardware sales, and first party IP is a good way to get people in the door so they make their cross-platform purchases on Switch. Would I play Splatoon on PS4? Yes. Would I enjoy seeing my friends buy Nintendo games for their PS4's. Yes Do I understand why Nintendo would NEVER do that? Also yes.

TL;DR: It's OK when Nintendo does it, because I like that a company still makes good dedicated games machines.

>But that's not the case they make a console that their developers are comfortable with creating on. In turn their games have higher quality.
I still don't see the causal relationship between higher quality and not after the game is made porting it to other systems as well.
>Not entirely, I really like the Switch's core gimmick, it's something I've wanted for a while
If you think the hardware can stand on its own with this - great.
> exclusives only really matter on Nintendo hardware because for the most part they are the only company that puts out worthwhile exclusives
My question is why they have to be exclusive for this, or alternatively why porting them would make them less worthwile somehow.
> You think the ideal market is one with zero competition
I'm saying literally the opposite. I'm advocating for a market where console makers can't assure a market share through exclusive games, and hence have to compete based on the quality and features of their hardware. That's more competition, not less.
It also increases competition between developers, as now their competition would be all games, not only the games available on the system.

Exclusivity reduces competition.

>"take risks"
>Hopefully we get a new Metroid, Donkey Kong, F-Zero, or even Pikmin

you can only have one

>have to compete based on the quality and features of their hardware
Nobody gives a flying fuck about the hardware. Its all about the software it runs, hence when exclusivity will always exist. You are removing the most important part of the marketplace and saying its somehow adding competition.

>okay well SJWs certainly wouldn't be interested in something like TMS so there's literally no reason to pander to them.

Do you have proof user because it sounds like your talking out your ass.

>Only thing it does is piss off the actual audience.

So giving the female characters better outfits that still look pretty cute it bad? Plus if the gameplay the same the it really shouldn't matter.

I have no idea what you're talking about so your proved nothing to me.

I did read your whole post and nothing you said has made sense and seeing has you do back up what you said, yeah "SJW's" has you call them haven't really done anything, not my problem.

OK First of all what the fuck does SJW Media even fucking mean?

Second of all to your post game Sjw game that sold, my question to you is that do you have proof to back up what you claim user? I mean surely if would be easy to prove me wrong.

> Nobody gives a flying fuck about the hardware.
If that were true, there wouldn't be the release of pro/xbo, and there wouldn't be frequent new console releases in general.
>Its all about the software it runs, hence when exclusivity will always exist.
So why are you against a world where it can run all software?

When a game is made to be ported they have to take into account many different systems. And developing/testing takes money and time.

When a developer just has to develop for a single console they can focus much more on what they want to make and refine it on the single platform; and not make sure it works for everyone on a different platform and weaken it so one size fits all.

In turn it they can focus on making the highest quality game they can muster.

if you haven't tried BOTW I really recommend you try it or emulate it when it gets better.

It's really a technical marvel the amount of detail in the world is amazing

>So giving the female characters better outfits
They're better because they aren't showing as much skin, right?
Why are Americans such Puritans?
>Plus if the gameplay the same the it really shouldn't matter.
Wrong. Have some wisdom from Sakurai

but what if we get peach with an afro tomorrow

>When a game is made to be ported they have to take into account many different systems.
I don't say "make it to be ported". I say "make it, then see if it can be ported".

Evidently, all the wii u to switch ports show that those games CAN be ported, even if they're not made for it.

I'm saying that SJW games are shit. SJW's make good games shitty. If my examples were too niche for you (given abysmal sales), let's look at what happens when they tell Feminism to sell the 2016 Ghostbusters movie.

>So why are you against a world where it can run all software?
Because there would be no competition for hardware otherwise.

DON'T YOU FUCKING

So when AC: Origins and Wolfenstein 2 sell well what's gonna be your new argument against sjw diversity?

Nintendo systems are all very similar.

They are built around being backwards compatible.

They have just refined their tools over the years.
Its really interesting to see the evolution of the programs theyve used.

Nintendo already has a delicious brown woman revealed and she's WAY better than any of those stupid afro cutout women.

just think, user. she'll probably have a new urban costume in new donk city

I don't argue possibilities.

I'm sceptic. The new yakuza guy who leads nintendo pretty much said already that they will focus on a steady release schedule rather than blowing their load early like they did with the wii u. I think you won't get any real nintendo games until mario odyssey is out. The switch should be capable to run a few modern games though which means ports are more likely. They also seem to be very interested in porting over stuff that almost died on the wii u. I wouldn't be surprised to see a bayonetta or smash port tomorrow.

Read my post, I said they form cancers on successful games. Look at what happened with Mass Effect Andromeda. So much promise, crapped out. Or Borderlands 2. Same thing.

The competition would be pretty obvious. You could properly compare hardware, look at how well games play on each system before deciding which one to buy. You'd have free picks between hardware without being restricted by your games preference. That's more competition.
The Wii U AMD/IBM chip is similar to the Switch nvidia tegra chip? I have a hard time believing this.

I actually would love to see her in her Mario Strikers outfit in New Donk. That's a good idea.

Does anyone have that SJW company complaining that their twitter followers don't even buy their games and they had to go out of business?

If you own a Switch, hit the "+" button when a game is highlighted in the menu and select "Third Party Licenses". Ton of info on their tools there; everything from rendering libraries to basic UNIX utilities.

>That's more competition
No its less.

>no remakes

>freedom to pick between hardware, and all hardware having you as a potential customer, means less competition between hardware

what

Pokemon is literally the only first-party Nintendo franchise that does blatant remakes, and then, technically it can be considered second-party or third-party because Game Freak and the Pokemon Company handle so much of it.

You are already free to chose between hardware.

Not if you want a specific kind of games. You want weebshit, you're stuck with sony. You want mario, pokemon, zelda, you're stuck with nintendo. You want... well, I'm sure microsoft has something that means you're stuck with them. You want mmo/strategy, you're stuck with PC.

Those guaranteed audiences mean less competition.

>Pokemon is literally the only first-party Nintendo franchise that does blatant remakes
They did 4 zelda remakes in 8th gen alone, and switchfags are begging for a TPHD+WWHD pack

Far Cry 4 and Uncharted 4 did well. Plenty of diverse games do well because most people aren't triggered by different characters.

Yes, mixing all those people into one clusterfuck would solve everything. Ever wonder why you aren't the CEO of a company?

Because I don't have the connections, or the MBA.

What you don't have is arguments, so you try to substitute sarcasm. That's a pretty poor substitute, so try again.

Your argument is based on a ridiculous situation that will never happen, hard to remain factual and avoid cracking jokes.

My argument is that exclusivity is a negative thing, a lack of it would be better, and a game being exclusive doesn't improve the game.

So far you haven't offered anything that actually disproves this.

>Still no proof.

So I guess that means you're talking out you're ass, OK Cool good talk user.

So no proof, oh and what's this, needing to bring up a movie when we're talking about games?

Yeah nice try user.