Seriously, why the fuck is this allowed? Literally no other video game company does this

Seriously, why the fuck is this allowed? Literally no other video game company does this.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=VjzgbZL12VI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>I turned millions of people to your games
Yeah, I'm sure Nintendo needed that when they own the most valuable IP in gaming.

It's Nintendo's shit, they can do it if they want. I hate entitled jewtubers and streamers thinking they deserve to be making money off of playing games.

>some youtuber is responsible for nintendo being known

>My youtube videos are my magnum opus and I will never do anything significant with my life plz give me attention so I can feel important.

Every single youtuber ever.

There's a chance, depending on how large his channel is, that what he says is true (that he did, in fact, turn millions of people on to nintendo.)

With that said, he still sounds like a whiny faggot.

Donkey claimed that thanks to him is why League of Legends is the most popular moba now these days

i don't know what the fuck he expected.

to suddenly not be blacklisted and allowed to make nintendo videos, despite still being an enormous shitheel?

>(that he did, in fact, turn millions of people on to nintendo.)

At least they didn't take it down. Why the fuck would you depend on YouTube for money? Does he really have no other marketable talent?

>Youtube is the next generation of media. We are the new newscasters, journalists, sitcom stars, and you need to take us seriously
>Alright big boys stand in line with the rest of the media outlets and ask for permission to use copyrighted content
>NO WAIT I MADE YOU YOU ONLY EXIST BECAUSE OF US!

These people are like if a hobo washed your windows against your will, and then declared that you owed them money for the act.

>35 likes
I going to guess he's exaggerating

This guy is a fucking mental case. He does not give a good look for Nintendo.

>Why the fuck would you depend on YouTube for money?

Because it is easy money for him? Otherwise he needs to get a real job. Thats why he is bitching about this, same with Five pesos Joe that bitches every week or two that one of his vid got takes the monetization taken from him

So ads appear on the video, so what? Does anything actually happen to him?

>actual literal degenerate that has done gay porn
>Constantly shit talks Nintendo and is generally a whiny cunt
>"Waaah why won't you let me make money off shilling your products"

Nintendo don't want to associate his kind with their family friendly products. He's also very likely done some shady shit behind the scenes out of spite and anger to community managers and shit when he gets in contact with them.

>Make shitty lets play videos of Nintendo games
>put ads on them to turn a profit
>Nintendo seizes ad revenue, leaving lets play faggot in the dirt

Based Jews.

>Does anything actually happen to him?

He is no longer getting the money, but the person who claimed the video does ( nintendo in this case )

The only companies that profit from having their games played on YouTube are the smaller ones like indie games. Shit like binding of Isaac exploded because of Youtube

There's a chance it's completely the other way around and he's acting like an entitled fag.

5!

>nintendo makes so little money they have to steal youtubers content for add dollars
Really makes you ponder.

>Nintendo repeatedly makes it clear they are anti-streamer
>Retards still stream their shit and whine when they get fucked over

the absolute ego on these faggots
>i made you, nintendo!

Why would it not be allowed? Literally every company does this.

You do not get paid for work you're not requested to do.

>Jewtuber crying thread
MODS MODS MODS

Because it's Nintendo's property and they can do what they want with it.

was this before or after nintendo did that youtube agreement where people could sign on to get paid by nintendo for views

Josh is a fag. No Nintendo fan likes him, and he's so toxic that Nintendo themselves don't want to work with him. He even burned bridges with those fags on gamexplain.

He's recently taken to arguing with me on my video comments. I have, like, fifty subscribers. Fuck Josh Thomas.

>off by one
>adubbs hitler claiming singles

Not sure what rustle my jimmies the most, Nintendo who wants to control everything with their name on it in the internet or streamers who thinks they are the center of the world.

Is it though? Isnt there like an industry of people playing games and making content out of that? How would that be possible if it all belonged to the games publishers?

DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA WHO I AM?
MY YOUTUBE REVIEWS HAVE DEPOPULATED ENTIRE VILLAGES

Rogersbase should never associate with this xhamster jerking diaper wearing faggot ever again.

whatever.

Because other companies are more lenient with letting people play their games on youtube.

>blaming Nintendo
It's Nintendo of America. Miyamoto doesn't give a fuck.

Source: I'm a semi popular Porn artist who had a legal feud with them over some of my work.

youtube.com/watch?v=VjzgbZL12VI

He was not wrong though about the game, LoL is trahs indeed

Publishers generally allow it, Nintendo doesn't.

Afaik video game gameplay hasn't had a fair use trial in America yet, but YouTube seems to be under the assumption that the IP holders would win.

I used to watch his New Leaf videos back in the days when it had only just came out in Japan, and although I enjoyed his videos for a while, it became quickly apparent that the guy is a complete arrogant douche.

Totally up himself.

I'm surprised they still talk, honestly.

>The claimant is allowing their content to be used in your YouTube video.
That faggot should be grateful.

Streamers, easily. A company is expected to safeguard their property and image. Streamers decide that things should be a certain way and get butthurt when that's not reality

Of course they would, it's no different than a MST3K riff. Reviews are fair use of course, but then Youtube and Nintendo are still well within their rights to do whatever they want with those videos.
Youtube has a deal with big rights holders to give them full control of their own content in return for not getting their asses sued. Fair use doesn't mean the content isn't copyrighted, it just means you get to use it. If you want to do so without dealing with Nintendo you'll just have to host it on your own server.

Roger is probably turning a blind eye though for what reason idk

I once got in a fight with a hobo because of this. I felt bad afterwards because the hobo was a teenager and i was 20 something already.

>defending corporations
Good goy

I hate entitled shitheads more than the people making the games

Literally who?

>Why can't I make money off of Nintendo's IP? REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

I wouldn't say Dunkey was in any significant way responsible for League's success, but the playerbase did take a hit when he stopped playing.

I think it was mostly good timing. A lot of people who were getting tired of LoL, a lot of direct competition that was rising in popularity, etc. I wouldn't say he directly drove people to quit the game, but for a good amount of players he might have indirectly played a part.

I don't even think it was on the most part loyalty to Dunkey or anything, I think in the end it was just an opportunity for many players to consider if they even wanted to play it.

...

>Blacklisted and constant copyright claims
>Viewing restrictions: none
What exactly is the problem here?

I'm going to side with Nintendo on this one because fuck e-celeb Let's Play bullshit.

This is the Bitblock guy right? What did he do to get blacklisted? I can assume he's blacklisted because I see plenty of other Youtubers who aren't part of the Nintendo Partner program that don't get their shit taken down

kek

Maybe they would have let him if he wasn't a literal faggot.

You're a fucking idiot

>monetized by claimant

I'd give that hobo money, then tell him to fuck off. He did actual work. The YouTube guys get paid to do nothing.

you'd rather support a leech who thinks he's the reason for Nintendo's popularity?

He broke review embargo for Woolly World and posted his review two weeks early.

Well that makes sense to me. He broke the contract he made with Nintendo, so he doesn't get anymore free shit. I'm assuming he threw a huge bitchfit about it and Nintendo put him on their copyright claim blacklist?

>"I'm such a big fan of Nintendo that I won't make videos about their games unless I get paid for it"

It's not Nintendo's job to put food on his table.

>e celeb complain because nintendo doesn´t suck his cock
poor guy

He barely has a following, most people don't even like him since all he does is complain when he doesn't get what he wants from Nintendo and when he does, he complains they didn't do it right

most don't demand money they just ask. This youtube faggot thinks he's god gift on earth

>nintendo fucks over their own fanbase over and over
>they still choke on the fat nintendo cock anyway like good little cucks

really makes you think

The guy is a detestable twat and proof Nintendo's blacklist is worth having.

Yeah, most of them just issue takedowns and call it a day.

If he's doing a review of the game, then Nintendo has no right to claim monetization. If he's just recording himself playing the game and commenting over it then that's not covered by fair use. The difference is about an hour's worth of lazy, unedited content. I'm glad Nintendo is claiming Let's Play videos because this shit is stupid.

>people talk about some literally who youtuber
>don't want to talk about Miitopia

Miitopia is great, please go play the demo. You won't regret it.

>the most valuable IP in gaming.
GTA? Call of Duty?

He definitely helped. And he never asked for shit except to be unbanned once so he could finish a video.

I mean fuck each video he does gets on average something like 4 million views. You're really going to claim he doesn't have SOME influence?

I didn't even know there was a demo. It doesn't seem like my kind of game but I'll check it out.

Even reviews have fairly strict rules to fall under fair use. Things like using only footage necessary to illustrate the point you're making. Fair use is also something that has to be determined by a court on a case-by-case basis, so it's not like a magic umbrella where you can do whatever you want as long as you call it a review.

It's debatable. Mario is definitely more so of a household name than those brands are.

He never said that. You should work on a news channel.

The guy legit has millions of views on his Wii Fit videos. It's unexplainable.

No

League is big because of the old guard streaming on justin.tv, like kikeshot and regi

Hol up
*jerks off on camera*
So you be sayin
*Lubricates asshole*
You be sayin
*Wears a diaper*
you won't let me monotize videos n shieet
*Rants on social media*
You won't send me early review copies?
*Harrasses Nintendo employees*
IM QUITTING NINTENDO FOREVER
*doesn't quit Nintendo forever*

But that's why. Most people do indeed do this for a living, and he's been doing this long enough that he substituted it for an outside job.

Youtube beggars are trash. You don't get your ass kissed by a company after doing what you're paid for. You don't get to use their content to make a living while you do nothing other than post lazy ass videos. Nintendo is doing the right thing and these idiots on Youtube need to learn how to create real content instead of just running their mouths. Learn how to run a real legitimate business before you talk shit about how a successful one handles its shit.

But he never said "he made league popular". Never. That other user is full of shit.
I remember him saying that his league videos were his most popular ones and were relevant in the community, but never did he say "I made league popular, you guys".
I mean, that wouldn't even make sense since by the time he started making videos league was pretty popular already.

>it's a "I don't want to share with nintendo even though I'm using their content to make videos" thread

I don't feel sorry for them when they could just suck up the minor revenue loss and play ball. But I guess children think clicking I agree to a third party should be all that's required.

>you want to make money on videos you have to give Nintendo a cut
>if you do it for free NOTHING HAPPENS
Wow I wonder why I would side with a company on this one maybe because if you are doing this for money then your in the wrong business

I never said he made league big- but he undoubtedly was good for league. And the player base took a hit when he left.

Nintendo likes money. And they are idiots. So...

Mario is above them all.

>YOU OWE ME

lol no, I'd file claims just out of spite.

never cease to amaze how self-centered these fuckers are

Can't you just ask ninendo? You just have to share your ad revenue with them from your vids.

Never heard of those. I do know So Super Mario and Zelda though. Oh, and I have Packaman in my phone.

he got you to try it out, so now nintendo can't copyright his pic related

So the person who made the game is getting paid when people watch videos that use the game?

Seems fair.

Of course, but if you do a 10min video where you talk about the game or movie then no company is going to bat you an eye. If you're doing an hour long two part series where you describe each scene of the movie then no, that's not fucking fair use; that's a mystery science theatre set up. Even the MST3K guys had to pay royalties before they could use the films in their episodes. Why do youtuber's feel like they get to be different? I was looking through YouTube's own examples of fair use and a video by this guy Pro Jared was used. He did a review of Drake and the 99 Dragons and I was surprised that it's literally just him going through the game, level by level, and describing everything that's happening. The rules are so fucked and I don't know who's trolling who anymore.

Leave it to Nintenbro fags like these worthless fucks to completely disregard the meaning of fair use so they can keep choking on Nintendo's dick.

Was it a girl?

lmao get a life fag