Play Japanese game

>play Japanese game
>has a """"""""""""""'dragon"""""""""""""""" with 4 legs

Getting real tired of this shit

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=q9vKQmGUdbg
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

All dargon habe 4 leg

>play American game
>has a (((((((((dragon))))))))) with 0 arms

>Redditors still think Dragons need to have 4 legs
Where is this meme from? Dungeons and Dragons? Mythology comes first.

dragon habe 4 leg and 2 wing and smart
wyvern hab 2 legs and 2 wing and poison
drake have 2 leg 2 wing
wyrm haev 4 leg and no wing

People will defend this

Yer mum cums first lel

That's a wyvern though

Hey there, Reddit! How's it going?

>game has dragons

Can you not read? It clearly says Dragon.

...

MRW TFW MFW DESU LOL IFNK WHYVERNS ARE DRAGONS

>Bethesda in charge of knowing what a dragon is

This is what dragons actually look like. Notice the 4 legs?

>realistic
>dragon
lol!

Dragons = 4 limbs + 1 set of wings
Wyverns = 2 limbs + 1 set of wings
Wyrms = 4 limbs
Educate yourselves!

Excuse me, Sweetie, but it's probably best if you leave these matters to the experts.

Why did the Vikings think Fafnir was a dragon and not a Wyvern? Didn't they play Dungeons and Dragons!?

...

>He doesn't have a dragon pet
lel

I don't see an issue

>get BTFO
>respond with reddit
Every time

Ah yes, the Slavic Drak*

* t/n Drak is Slavic for Wyvern

If western dragons (wyverns) are so smart, why can't they clap?

Because they're not American stupid.

He is not in charge of designing the dragons, you retard.

>dragon

>evolutionary logic in a game where you can fucking shoot fireballs out of your hands

what mental defect causes a persons brain to not see the failure in logic?

4 legs, 2 legs, no legs none of it matters
What matters is how big that dragon dick and how tight that dragon butt is

Real talk. Does anyone know why people call Saint George a Dragonslayer when he only slew a Wyvern?

I mean wverns.

It's supposed to be an animal. It should make sense and it's design should work even if it's completely fictional, otherwise it's lazy and shit.

>decides the exact splinter sect beliefs of a single dark elf in a hut
>has no say over the sweeping decision whether a wyvern gets called a dragon
keep telling yourself that bethesdrone

Probably because they weren't autistic enough to care about dragon classifications back then

because there was no autism in the middle ages

It's so ironic and pathetic and Japs try to appropriate Chinese culture.

...

Oh there definitely was. The amount of heresies that sprung all with slight little teaks to the bible was hilarious

>chinese dragons will never be utilized in games
>even if they did, they would look like shit

Eastern dragons don't tend to be evil, so they have little use in games.

>There is no evolutionary reason for an extra pair of limbs sticking out of your back
Wow i guess evolution is really wrong then

youtube.com/watch?v=q9vKQmGUdbg

Skip to 8:40

>he thinks wyrms are dragons

Insects don't factor in. There are no vertebrate animals with six limbs.

It doesn't even have to be a villain, I just want to see good Chinese dragons.

no, that's your own autistic rule that you make up that no creative body of fantasy work has ever followed in any way

fantasy is fantasy

make believe stories have never, since the dawn of time, ever had to make sense because they are make-believe. This includes every part of the story from the locations to the animals to the language to the fucking sex positions.

What the fuck, I hate GoT now!

That's a lindworm

I hate when dragons don't have 4 legs and a set of wings. Wyverns look so ridiculous and awkward to me.

...

>hurr mass-to-size ratio that would never get off the ground with "flapping wings" or receive sufficient blood flow
>realistic, should work
you can turn down the autism

...

>make-believe writer wants to make his make-believe creatures that again, do not exist in reality, "scientifically accurate"
>meanwhile in his stories men are raised from the dead as frozen wraiths and women walk through fire unscathed and people steal other people's faces and kids can mind control animals

RR Martin is a fucking hack

This "well it's non-fiction but THIS has to be realistic because I said so and THIS has to be realistic because it makes sense to me" retardation has to stop

either make your story grounded in reality or don't, there's no justification for this "realism" nitpicking bullshit other than "because I want it to be" and you faggots need to stop confusing this with "it makes sense"

>Realistic vs Unrealistic
>in a completely fictional world
I've always hated the stupidity of this image, if you want to be realistic why not complain about the fact that such a large creature would never be able to fly to begin with or shoot magic out of it's mouth?
Whenever someone starts talking about realism in a fantasy game someone needs to slap their shit.

>redguard
>canon

wyverns look fine, it's just that they are wyverns and therefore inferior to dragons by default.

I don't like dragons that don't have functioning arms.
How am I supposed to give them proper hugs then?

...

I want all of those to be my loyal pet best friend boyfriends

Kys lizardfag

Why do we have multiple threads that reach hundreds of posts each for a question that can be solved with

That's a drake.

>Play game with medieval fantasy setting
>dragons don't have eyes all over their bodies

how does it feel to have aids, cancer and ebola in the mouth at the same time

>watch Japanese cartoon
>has a """"""""""""""'dragon"""""""""""""""" who looks like a little girl AND is a lesbian

This is a dragon.

Here is a real life dragon straight from google.

How bout you kill me

Is that Anzu

I want to abduct that child

Is it behind that sentient fashion accessory?

TES "Dragons" aren't actually Dragons. They're Dovah and they can technically take any number of different forms, even the form of a human (hence you play as the Dragonborn (Dovahkiin))

Not thicc enough for a dragon.

What about Kalameet

reminder

So, a centaur dragon?
I actually have an image for that but I already got one warning this week.

>but I already got one warning this week

Hmmmm

It was video game related I swear officer

>4 legs
>2 legs, 2 arms
what's the difference

>evolutionary
Can anyone name a single fantasy setting that isn't creationist?

>Dragons with 4 legs, 2 arms, and 2 wings

...

This is a dragon.

Nice dragon, have a dragon.

Anime is not good

Too bad it doesnt make an appearance.

Indeed, it far surpasses mere good

>japanese game
>dragon is 100000000 year old stuck inside 9 year old girl pedobait

People still get banned? I thought the mods had completely given up

Ok, have her dragon form then.

>Japanese game
>No katana
>everybody is white
>its set in medival fantasy europe
Why?

Didn't say banned, I only got warned.

Accurate to the manga.

That's a child.

Depends what mods are about, there seems to be one or two that will ban for NSFW even if it's just a nipple showing. I've been banned multiple times a day just for sexy full clothed images. It's random. Sometimes the bannings and post deletions can get to reddit tier.

Captain obvious saves the day once again.

Nah I'm saying don't be a pedo.

He was pretty easy even in the original 7th Dragon on DS. Was great seeing the fucker return in 3 with the dragonslayer embedded in his head.
Sylosis is still the best out of the standard boss dragon body types though, in terms of draconic look. Not bland like True Spectus or Tiamat, but still draconic and interesting looking.

bugs have more then two legs and also wings
bombardier beetles are bugs and the only things naturally using combustion by evolution
most dragon designs look like they have plates kind of like an exoskeleton instead of just scales
its completely possible for bugs to increase in size by evolution to great scales given optimal circumstances and other smaller tweaks to make them more alike the more charismatic animals and without loosing key characteristics that would only arise given their earlier heritage

why are yo so naive to think dragons could only be evolved from reptiles?
dragons are clearly evolved from bugs
their more reptilian features are thanks to convergent evolution like how the Tasmanian wolf isn't actually a canine but resembles them since those features worked in a predator

the "TWO LEGGY ONLY!!" dragonfags are right about only one thing: its evolutionary unlikely for additional appendages form into wings across many generations complementary to quadrupedal features
but they're so fucking wrong on so many other blaring points

these fags try to get all technical and scientific but since they clearly don't know shit it just highlights how pseudointellectual they really are, anyone who posts this unrealistic dragon bullshit is a straight C student atheist "nice guy" fedoratipper who thinks he's hot shit but could never graduate college

you know its true