Why was Diablo II so much better than Diablo and Diablo III?
Why was Diablo II so much better than Diablo and Diablo III?
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
I don´t understand what people see in these games. You´re just clicking on enemies and constantly swapping out stuff for slightly better stuff so you can click on enemies better.
What is this
I saw a thread shitting on MMORPGS and now this guy.
Are gaymen waking up?
i dont understand what people see in games,
Your just clicking buttons infrom of a screen
Games like Diablo is the poor man's casino. It's all about getting that "item." Sometimes it's just comfy and fun to grind away and watch pixels die and give gold.
they are not are you fat?
d3 has better graphics better online while d2 is trash
Diablo IIII when?
>Roman Numeral Four
>IIII
wasn't designed for console couch co op
because D1 is outdated and D3 is shit
>American education
Blizzard North somehow nailed some fucked up secret formula to making grinding fun. You could waste your life away with the game and have no regrets whereas a game like WoW would just leave you depressed.
That's all video games tho'
Generally in a game you do interesting and stimulating things.
Neither of those apply to Diablo.
This was kinda flagship/endgame back in the days.
The problem with d3 is that it had less content to reach an broader audience.
Well for one Diablo 2 has the best presentation of any game ever.
...
where can I download a drm free copy of diablo II?
There's no DRM on the official Blizzard version, though you have to pay for it.
...
bear in mind that blizzard fucked with the files and mods no longer work on the version from blizz website
gothic artstyle
most music was ambient and created a good mood
characters feel like they are your creation since skill points/stats are permanent (sorta) you had full control
Areas were neat
Potions were not fun in D2 and dying and dropping them all sucked
D2 had some abilities that were completely useless or were simply baked into a stronger abilities at a higher level. This was how the game was designed but it doesn't work very well.
Art design, gameplay, music, characters.
It wasn't. It just seemed like it was at the time.
D1 was better because it had an actual atmosphere to it.
>dude what if we take this gothic horror
>and put it in the desert lmao
dropped.
Opinion discarded
>this is what D2 fags actually believe
Protip: This is the exact same thing a wowfag would say about D2.
the burger is strong with this one
test
Mmorpgs and clickfest isometric games were never good. They were just grindfests you have nostalgia for.
Reminder: Sup Forums faggots think that the paladin was asian because the thought of playing a black character triggers them so much
...
You are one special kind of idiot.
what's the patricians' clicking game then?
The desert is what makes me give up on doing a new run every time
>2
>Better than 3
You have to take off the goggles
So where can I download it?
They are off, Diablo 3 is pure trash
I pre-ordered it, btw
Femdiablo was hot as shit
Post more lewds.
The Diablo series uses tally marks you fuckwads
>Diablo 4 with a line through it
>Diablo V
Which do you honestly think they would use?
proof?
Ok but imagine the reveal for the fifth diablo, you see Diablo IIII, then a sick line gets cut through them and it's the fifth tally mark for like a trailer
It goes I then II then III like how tally marks do
what game is interesting to you? I'll tell you why it's shit pretty fast and really easy.
just like roman numerals?
>I don´t understand what people see in these games. You´re just clicking on enemies and constantly swapping out stuff for slightly better stuff so you can click on enemies better.
Making builds is fun in the ones where that's viable. I can't really stand the others though.
I just bought D3 with the expansion, did I make a mistake? why is everyone shitting on it?
Also the romans don't exist anymore so there's noone alive to be able to read their numbers
it's fine my dude just enjoy it, it's not egregiously terrible like D3 was at launch, it's a p decent game
>why is everyone shitting on it?
Because their only experience was launch D3
Is it true that D3 has awful build variety or is that just memes?
Haha it's le IIII instead of IV maymay! Include me in the screenshot, Reddit!
I havent heard of some tally nation
launch d3 was unbelievably dogshit
current d3 is just boring
It comes from the British phrase "Tally-ho" where they say that every time they see more than one of something
the classes actually felt different
>Insecure America bashers getting baited this hard
Diablo 1 is too dated for kids to enjoy and Diablo 3 is too modern for kids to admit they enjoy.
They are all half good half bad games. That's how that company rolls.
At high level play, yes. Only a few builds with a few types of equipment are usable.
>Diablo 3 launch
>rares were where it was at
>legendaries had deliciously low drop rate
>no unique legendary skill effects
>not as much number inflation
>actual difficulty levels
>dex was dodge instead of str clone
>some form of trading even if it was through an auction house
and now it's been trashed for set and legendary skill effects
way better skill customization, number 1.
The rune system vs a real skill tree was a shit decision, I think thats what i hated the most about d3 cuz it cut down build choices. It was cool other than that.
D1 was still ok but it was the first so of course by d2 they had ideas of improvements.
They waited way to long for d3 though and forgot that good shit, and probably lost some of the people that made d2 good
Ooooo.... Ouch user, ouch
What is kratos doing here
Except it's not. Diablo 1 is the most superior.
Because your nostalgia doesn't let you see that D2 was just as repetitive as D3
what if Diablo 3 had an actual roguelike mode? you don't learn anything automatically, you pick up gear that grants you skills as you go and you swap it around to see how far you can get, obviously perma death and vendors with strong loot, beefed up monsters and getting farther gives you some sort of progression like prestige or unlock harder content.
The gameplay was ahead of its time. The hand drawn models and environments aren't cartoonish and gives an atmospheric feel. the death sounds and animations of mobs makes it feel satisfying.
listen you NIGGER the soulless export of what you now see is what you described, but d2 and more importantly d1 were much more than simple loot games, and had amazing worldbuilding and character interaction
...
>All these fucking retards falling for the bait
At the time people said D2's graphics were cartoonist compared to D1
I personally think people are just retarded
Wrong, dude. The original's better, even in 2017.
I've played it. It's not great.