This is one of the best games ever released on PC and it has an 85 on Metacritic.
This is one of the best games ever released on PC and it has an 85 on Metacritic
thanks, wikipedia.
I fuck man ass?
Doom3 is better.
Sure. In the horror game genre.
It deserves the 85 though. It's a fun, beautiful game but it's not worth more than one playthrough and given its length its not worth more than 20-30 bucks.
...
kek
inb4 the God Hand vs Baby game reviews
Never said reviews were consistent. Just that in a vacuum to me 85 sounds about right for Doom.
Nier:Automata which had a pretty broken port for some got a 84 on metacritic.
4 months later and still hasn't received a patch yet.
It's higher than Blood which is a far better game so stop complaining
Also 85 is about right,
Campaign was good that about it.
the multiplayer was complete shit.
Not to mention the wall you in with that level designer.
Name a FPS campaign that is worth 100 to you then
The PC-focused Quake-style FPS movement and gunplay of Doom3 is classes above the D44M RPG.
First Modern Warfare
but you only get to play like that the last hour of the game. the majority of doom 3 is amnesia the dark descent.
STALKER
In my opinion that is worth 85. I guess this is the problem with attaching numbers to opinions.
Doom3 is better and was more successful than Half-Life 2. That says something.
Come on now be real my guy!
First episode of Doom maybe. There's no 100 campaign, they all have some bits that are more lazy or annoying or tedious than others.
It's actually fucking trash feels way too tightly designed, limited and loaded with typical modern design garbage "mechanics"
yeah it's better but still has plenty of problems of it's own and people that say it's "slow" have no fucking clue
it's really NOT that good.... i didn't enjoy it very much
I just bought it. Is it supposed to take forever too start up?
no
yes but the VAs are terrible so idk
you can strafe jump through all of doom 3
multiplayer in d3 was top tier though and SP should have had always run like MP
Descent 2
This is one of the best games ever released on PC and it has an 84 on Metacritic.
Contrarian/10
Half-Life
>way too tightly designed
like what the fuck does that even mean
My real issue with Doom after launch was the god awful constant patching that was 10gb each patch. It also picked the most inopportune times to download a patch as well.
I believe when I uninstalled it, the install folder was almost fucking 80GBs.
Think he means that it feels too limited and controlled, like there's no room for creative play.
the fuck are you talking about doom4 has much more quake like movement
fpbp
Yea when I realised Doom had no crafting mechanics........ instadrop!! Pwned that games right out of my library
you w0t m8?
maybe a bad way to describe it but It's like too tailored to be a certain way or give the player a certain experience I guess rather than the original or games like duke 3d etc where everything just kind of works autonomously no matter the situation or level etc
you don't understand quake at all the new doom is closer to halo
>the new doom is closer to halo
no it isn't, have you ever even played halo or even quake for that matter? Shit you probably never even played doom4
not as floaty as halo and ground speed is faster but that's it, it's nothing like quake to much ground friction lack of air control (with the rune it's all wrong), speed caps off too low
there is no skill to the movement or dodging you just kind of run around in circles focusing on one enemy after the other as everything whizzes past you very conveniently, there is no multitasking, there is no strategy, there is no positioning to consider.
there is only trash
What are you talking about you tit, plus D44M might as well have crafting since it already has upgrades, challenges and other useless shit
doom3 is tigggght
half life 1 might be a 100 campaign
It's not hard to be "one of the best games ever released" considering the sheer amount of garbage on PC.
Not to mention that it's not much more than just "good". The stupid skill trees for weapons, the glory kill mechanic, the samey-looking levels and the "locked in a room till the enemies die" design are definitely worthy of about an 85. No more.
Doom 3 is half mediocre FPS and half mediocre horror games, and those halves feel at odds with each other. It has some cool sci-fi environments, though.
>BASED ON 56 CRITICS
I will find one obscure game and give it 100 rate. Done, its best game in the world.
nah.
>DOOM
>best or even close to it
lmao
name a better fps during that time peroid, go ahead ill wait.. also i wouldnt call it horror its only spooky the first hour of play or so, after you get the stronger weapons its more run and gun.
Far Cry, Half-Life 2, FEAR.
I like it more because its proper optimized
OP is literally 12, and has not played too many games if absolute 6/10 at best trash like nuDuum counts as "best" anything.
fear is underrated af, could possibly be better than d3, half-life 2 is on the other hand, overrated as fuck. Never played the first far cry but if its all open world memey shit with no depth like the other 3 theres no way it can come close to d3 or HL1
Doom3 really wasn't a Doom game though. It was a great horror game though like a good solid 8 but DOOM was the better Doom game.
DOOM does have problems though, like bad bugs and ass load of DLC
>during that time period
I can't but why does that matter just because fps is having some shitty years doesn't make Doom 3 great
...
I don't really know what FPS campaign that is 100 to me. Maybe one of the first three halos but even then there's a co-op tied to it that made it very enjoyable.
Half-Life 2 is overrated as fuck, but it's still better than Doom 3 (but worse than HL1 and Episodes). Far Cry 1 isn't open world, it's a bunch of very large maps strung together, and you do them in linear fashion.
Look at the state of the Steam Summer Goy Tax, it was nothing but pictures of carts filled with SJW pixel art crap.
I doubt most of the master race on this board can even run DOOM on mid graphics settings.
doom3 is a solid game regardless
still disagree about half life two but your opinion isn't Mongolian tier, so fair enough
far cry is more like crysis 0.5 than it is far cry 3
far cry 2 is kino. fuck you. play it all the way through.
>doom3 is a solid game
meh
While sure not the best - D44M was still one of the rare AAA+++ games that I actually enjoyed. If you're calling it a bad game you either do not like action games or are just being overly cynical for reasons unknown.
It has zero bugs and the dlc is for the outsourced multiplayer Jewthesda forced in to the game
far cry 2 sucked
Doom 3 was poop
Also, Painkiller is roughly from that time period... though while Painkiller is a fun game, it's kind of too easy as you can jump around VVERY HHIGH SPEED while the enemies chase you around ineffectively.
>It has zero bugs
Wrong
you sucked
play it again
>shit on a plate wasn't as good as my delicious pasta, so this piss-smeared pasta is a good game
Johnny Guitar...
>Endless waves of scripted respawn
>Corridors everywhere
>Everything is scripted to death
>Zero space for imaginative gameplay
movie/10
no, it's a terrible game
doom 1 is overrated, ugly and has bad controls
it didn't age well at all
Care to make an analogy that isn't shit?
Id say its a 8.5 to a 9. I felt it didn't hit the quality of Ultimate Doom or most of Doom 2/Final Doom. But its still a great fucking game. I really hope in the sequel they find a way to keep more then 7 enemies max active at a time. Its a real buzzkill to have such a limited amount of challenge that the only reason nightmare is hard is because shit like Imps throw fireballs that feel almost homing and do 60-70 damage each to compensate for the lack of numbers.
Still great game.
Or, you know, I just hate literal fucking shills, and I've not let my standards drop to absolute rock-bottom levels in the past decade by consuming AAA console trash made for the widest audience.
NuDuum ain't a DooM game, not an oldschool anything, and ultimately just a fucking repetitive slog. Tons of missed opportunity and just pure major fuck-ups, because Bethesda needs to spoonfeed their GenZ kids.
fuck that that campaign killed my interest in CoD
>doom 1 is overrated, ugly and has bad controls
Nope on all three.
And this is coming from someone who played it for the first time in around 2009.
i bought it but runs like shit on my pc for some reason.
i5 4690k
16gb RAM
GTX 1080 TI
My monitor is 165hz with Gsync. Can't figure out why it runs like a slideshow
This is one of the best games ever released on consoles and it has an 98 on Metacritic.
what a terrible opinion.
It's 20 years old, of course it's ugly ya melon. The controls are fine for the most part, and flawless in source ports
>Shitty meme game for SJW shitters
>Higher score then good games.
How are you surprised? So many "journalists" and review sites are composed of people who have played like 10 games and like movies more then games.
...
>literal fucking shills
the game is like a year old at this point and was on sale multiple times
All day, just because I like it so much.
Ultimate Doom. I can think of maybe 2 mediocre levels and everything else is fine or great.
>just being overly cynical
too old
So you dont just like fps action games. Original Doom games are terrible fps games. And now if you're gonna throw some memes I liked Quake 1, 2, 3, have played quake live, reflex arena and have thousands of hours in TF2. But still I couldnt enjoy Doom I and II. They just feel like boring 2d sprite shooters with minimal aiming and nonexistant movement tech.
>it le had a homophobic comment xD
>boints offf x---D
At the time of release it was
What is terrible is that people like you exist and seem to make a huge chunk of "gamers" nowadays.
>It's 20 years old, of course it's ugly ya melon
This is the exact shit Gen-Z kids with no understanding about art-directing and style spew online.
I ain't even cynical. I just absolutely hate everything they've done to THE most iconic shooter's name and brand.
>Shill
Doom 1/2 are pretty much my favorite vanilla FPSs of all time. D44M doesn't reach their bar but that doesn't mean its not good on its own right. Its a solid game its not perfect its not godlike but its somewhat memorable and a solid experience after years of nothing of its kind besides maybe Shadow Warrior which was mediocre.
I'm sorry you cannot look at a game objectively on its own. I don't look at D44M and judge it on being as good as 1/2/Final i look at it and look for what makes a fun shooter and what it did right.
It had enemy variety , weapon variety , neat secrets although not as good as 1/2 secrets and was one of the few shooters where the few bosses battles felt decent.
Now it fell flat on its face in terms of color , enemies on screen and too many secrets being predictable and not really helpful to the core gameplay.
Id give it a 8-8.5 a very strong one. But its not a pinnacle game its just another decent game in the genre.
It was a great game and your shitty opinion and autistic screeching isn't going to convince people otherwise
>This is the exact shit Gen-Z kids with no understanding about art-directing and style spew online.
Art direction and style don't mean much when your game's a pixellated blocky mess desu, and this is coming from someone who likes the way Doom looks.
early id always had a shitty style. they were known as the "brown castle" company for a reason
It's not even a top 20 FPS
System Shock 2
Thief: The Dark Age
Unreal Gold
AVP
Bioshock
Nothing recently though
That's because you have a shit taste, m8
The fact that it's cinematic, doesn't make it bad, but the fact that it's fun, makes it pretty good.
Yes
I just finished this yesterday and wanted to do NG+ on highest difficulty but was a bit disappointed that you couldn't and doing a 100% playthrough on ultra nightmare is gonna suck.