ITT: Times where developers did not test their games
ITT: Times where developers did not test their games
>being bad at video games
Post your gold relic
No one on Sup Forums would have all the gold relics
Most of the levels are hard, but fair
High Road/Road to No Where are pretty broken though, i actually don't think they tested them at all
The pill hitbox combined with the faster jumping makes it hell
Haven't seen these levels in year.
Jesus Christ, this is nostalgia.
you mean the present time?
They did, they even toned it down because it was too hard.
Didn't the credits show developer times of every level and trial? Pretty sure they're aware how bullshit they are.
That's the original, which is much easier since it wasn't designed by retards
N sane trilogy fucks the hitboxes & jumping physics
Some of those plat relic times are based off of fucking TAS runs for the PS1 version
They didn't do quite a few of them
Looks fine to me...
youtube.com
youtube.com
Did DingDong ever beat The Lab Platinum Relic?
Say what?
youtube.com
They tested it, just not with normal human beings and not subhuman retards like you or the average let's player.
...
youtube.com
This was harder, user.
Crash discussion notwithstanding, Rayman 1 is basically "Did they even playtest this?": the game. Still love it but that game is some bullshit.
>Then you see people doing the level 20 seconds under gold time with no problems
>And realize It's not the game's fault but your casual ass self
...
Fucking shit, Fumbling is longer than I remember.
Just Picture City. That shit is fucked. The rest of the game is fine.
Why are levels in crash 2 all the same?
I mean they all have the same design and enemies
Once in a while you get something good
Every platformer ever
>Christopher Robin
Jesus Christ don't remind me.