Game

>Game
>Game: Subtitle
>Game: Subtitle
>Game: FOR CONSOLE
>Game: FOR HANDHELD

What would you have done in their place? If they hadn't done that the public would have been retarded

>ONLY ON GAME CONSOLE
>*ALSO ON PC

EXCLUSIVE

real talk, who was in the wrong in that situation?

Name ONE (1) game that does this.

>Game
>Game 2
>Game III
>G4ME
>Game: Subtitle
>Game (current year) [reboot]

Super Smash Brothers.

Super smash

I think the actual number of people who would be unable to discern which game is for which platform without those subtitles, despite being clearly labeled, is not nearly is much as you think it is.

I once heard someone say it should have been Super Smash Bros R3D and Super Smash Bros BLU. Should be obvious which is for which.

No.

>Game
>Game 2
>Game 3
>Game: Subtitle
>Game: 0
>Game Reboot (CANCELLED)

Because they're the fourth games in the series, get it? For=Four?

Smash vros

I CARRIED AN M16

>mainline games in the HD era have been underwhelming as FUCK
>spinoff handheld game was much better than them, yet it won't get a sequel or a similar game to it on consoles as a downloadable or such

I CARRIED AN M16

Still no.

>Game
>Game 2
>Game 3
>Game World
>Game 64

How do you jump to #64 in the series that quick?

TWISTED SISTER

Artifacts like the We're Not Gonna Take It music video can tell us a lot about the time in which they originated and the people of said time.

You mean the same public that thought the Wii U was a Wii peripheral? The naming conventions they went with both made discerning the games easy and allowed them to increase word of mouth for the Wii U

>Game (1982)
>Game (1996)
>Game (2005)
>G A M E (2016)

Not the public's fault that it had a shit advertising campaign.

Name ONE (1) game that does this.