GRAPHICS Thread

Consoles and PC welcome

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=d480zpAQu08
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

ARMA (2 and 3) looks like you take a PS3 game and add a gigantic LOD mod

...

I guess it's kinda true, I still find it impressive.

>360p in a graphics thread

...

...

...

Why are these shit threads always neglecting art design? Who gives a fuck about texture resolution apart from normies and shills for 600 bucks (((graphic cards)))

...

Because it's the graphics thread, not the art style thread you muppet.

who gives a fuck about graphics, it's just technical power tacked on art design

...

>who gives a fuck about graphics, it's just technical power tacked on art design
I do

...

nice speed

...

...

looks like trash

...

plastic foliage
looks like bf3 but more stuff on screen

...

>mountains in the distance hidden behind some kind of blue fog
>that tree

looks like shit

>plastic foliage
nice meme

nice bloom

why is the sky in the reflection different

>lo-looks like shit

nice frog

...

looks good to me

that grappa map is just shit and ur screenshot had low-res textures everywhere

...

looks better than trashfield

>low-res textures everywhere
where for example?

>two word replies
contain your nitpick autism worthless trashposter

>cant see shit except some lights
>OWAH IMPRESSIVE

>DONT CRITICIZE MY GAME GRRAAAAAA

Stop trying. No one thinks you're smart.

>every single artillery shell, wood plank, brickstone is rendered at such a far distance
>ONLY SOME LIGHTS LOOOL

kil yourself retard

it's in miles I swear I was going faster

What game?

Alright we get it Mr. Electronic Arts hot shot, your games look great on your $8000 Personalized Computing Platform and your biceps are fuckhuge. There are multiple games on the market that have superior skyboxes though. Make a third person action rpg with frobyte already, because only then will I give a fuck about your shooty bang bang we was kangz games.

you don't need an 8000 pc to make frostbyte games look good, they look fine on toasters, just look at the console versions.

nigger its dark as fuck you can see shit in that screenshot

Yeah, that's true. It's a incredible engine but I want a game like Witcher 3 on it, I'd buy the hell out of it

...

1997 3D graphics
MS-DOS game
fight me Sup Forums

youtube.com/watch?v=d480zpAQu08

Looks fine on my screen, fix your gamma/brightness

nigga its a night/dark map, you donmt see as much as you would if that was a daytime map.

now neck yourself, battlefield looks bad with shit textures if you look closely

wtf i thought asseto corsa was ugly. must be the track and environments that are

Battlefield 1 is fucking beautiful with great textures. Please note how you've failed to actually point out your shitty textures. It might not be a great game, but it sure looks good.

lay down and look at the ground textures in that forest map for example, pure dogshit. battlefront looks better

it really looks fine my dude
try setting your contrast lower

I would've posted good graphics but my hdd died with all the good stuff on it so here's this

...

...

what game?

>realism in videogame visuals is just technical power slapped on design
poor bait if you'd know what goes into that, I lean towards unique art styles too but that's why it's a graphics thread, but nothing's stopping you from posting your favorites

horrible

...

This makes my dick hard

Most of my screenshots are way over the file size limit

when will one of these games have actual good gameplay!? i just want a good game with these graphics,is that too much to ask?

...

desu that screenie looked like shit, way worse than what the game actually looks like

In-game vs photo mode with some tweaking, couldn't get it to look the same way and it was quite frustrating

in other words the real thing vs bullshot generator

>tfw I'm just a pleb who loves playing in 200 fps instead of jerking to grass

true to SOME extent, but the LOD/scale is ridiculously impressive

Not an argument

I don't think it's rare occasion to have great graphics and gameplay at all. Doom 2016 looked great and it played nicely.

While technically not very impressive, the aesthetics of Nier Automata were pretty great, and it's a great game.

I'd say ArmA 3, with all that undisturbed open space

>>mountains in the distance hidden behind some kind of blue fog

seems you have no fucking idea how real world works

Is it impossible for consoles to into ansiotropic filtering?

Yeah, although to be fair most of the time it looks way worse, taking a picture that looks good in photo mode is a pain in the ass, the new drone camera added in FH3 is pretty neat, because it's basically an ingame photo mode and works in multiplayer.

I'm going to try resizing some screenies I have from the drone camera to upload them

>take mediocre graphics
>add reflections on wet roads only
>OMG IT'S SO PRETTY

It's like every gta 5 mod but done even worse.

that's the new Infamous isn't it? Yeah why are the reflections orange, it's like the sky is burning or something

oh, fuck me, it's right in filename
have Hard Reset screenshot, back when Flying Wild Hogs were still indie devs
I was about to brofist you, but then I realised it's not Gothic 3.

Ok it's lower res to fit the 4mb limit but here's a pic from the drone camera

Here's antoher one, looks a bit worse because of the wet effect on the camera but it's still pretty good

pls reply

It depends on the game but final fantasy is known for not being able to get into this kind of thing.

Does anyone have some pics of Horizon Zero Dawn? I know we're supposed to hate it since it look better than most PC games, but you can't deny that the Decima Engine is a marble.

This game was such a bitch to get running well, but it does look pretty good.
Not a Hero when?

Battlefield 1

Yes but I feel as though there is an abnormally high amount of games when looking at screenshots from conole that don't into it and the performance cost is very low.

I haven't played this game, but from the pictures I've seen is like they actually managed to make the game look as good as the prerendered backgroung of REmake. It loooks really nice.

Alien: Isolation.

Welcome to the world of console optimization

In the 7th gen developers started having games with very very narrow Field of View, so with less shit to render, the games perform much better. That's what happens when you want to push the graphics bar on a closed spec machine. Compromises will have to be made. Later console games were running 25FPS on top of all kinds of graphical compromises to stay "playable".

Look at a comparison between GTAV on PS3/360 and on new consoles and PC, the amounts of pop in going fast on a car just to crash on something that didn't load yet, is absolutely disgusting.

Could it be that there's some issue with having AF, or could be developers opting for whatever performance advantages they can grab, what is the cost, 1FPS? Might be enough to hit the 30FPS stable standard

Syndicate looks amazing even on normal settings.

Syndicate actually runs well as well.
Consoles are cancer.

...

The background looks like a fucking skybox.

...

...

>art design

The fuck are you doing user?

every time i see pictures of this game i get kind of sad. the world looked so great, detailed, and lived-in. but it was just so mediocre. i had no interest in the characters or story, and the combat felt really bad. such a waste.