Let's settle this once and for all

Let's settle this once and for all.
Who wins 1v1?

Bipebro wins by acting like an aussie

Couchbro will hide in a corner and snipe him ez

If they had similarly good or bad aim, I would say bipedal bro because he'd easily pop out from behind a corner and headshot the nearly stationary crouchbro most times.
Since bipedal has bad aim and crouch has good aim, that moves the winning chances more toward the crouchbro side.
Aim is absolutely the most important factor.

Power stance always wins.

You forget, crouchbro is using an uzi singlefire and cornercamping, so he's retarded. Bipedal bro has the strategy advantage and can flank crouchbro.

>uzi
fuck off faggot

the only winning move is not to play this garbage game

I disagree, positioning is always above aim

You forgot to add the power stance into the calucation, doc.

>uzi
its a mac10 you goddamn tard

also how do you flank a corner?

Is that a mac 10? It looks like an oversized version of that baby uzi they made.

if you don't instantly recognize those models get the fuck out of Sup Forums underage

>short
>thinking he has a chance
When will they learn?

You're forgetting the most important thing

Noise!
Crouch = no noise
walk/run = very obvious directional steps

>implying I wasted my time on CS.
I was playing quake at the time and shitting on my friends who played CS.

Even in the best position,
You still have to hit them.

>Powerstance
He wins

aren't smgs complete and utter garbage in every cs except go?

even if you set it to single fire somehow you'll probably still miss someone 2 feet away

NUMALE SMASH TRUMP AND WHITE PEOPLE

Crouchbro would win if they used the same weapons, otherwise Bipedalbro.

>left is short
>right is in power stance
This isn't even a fair fight.

>single fire
>high damage
>using a mac10

???