This fucking graphics

>This fucking graphics

My dick, CGI movies in UE4 real-time when

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0zjPiGVSnfI
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

you should edit that so that at the end there's a picture of woody's woody with the caption "my dick"

>can see the polygons on Hamm's head
Try again.

>they'll never make a toy story game similar to the toy story 2 game with these graphics

go back to ifunny

no

>animated films that take server farms fucking hours just to render a single frame
>compared to a video game that needs to render in real-time
>asking for this on a board that goes ballistic if it doesn't render at 60fps+
"no"

It's easier when you're just replicating toys made of plastic and fabric. Doing something like monsters inc. or the incredibles in real time would be impossible.

How can Pearlfags even compete?

Well its possible if you set your minimum specs to 2 SLI'd 1080ti's

It's more that it's not currently practical

Can't wait to hear all the discount versions of the Toy Story actors in the English version.

They only take so long to render because they don't bother optimizing anything. Real time can use tricks and optimized effects to achieve similar results.

What is keeping real time from looking like pre-render?

Limited resources

never? those guys have 20 servers with $1000 gpu just for render 1 frame ever minutes.
And they can adjust things manually.

KH games have always looked visually impressive for their time of release.

It's a shame the story is built for children and they play like total shit. KH3 at least looks like it's a bit better mechanically but it'll probably be the same mashing for 100 hours.

No consumer hardware that supports ray-tracing

Remember this?

youtube.com/watch?v=0zjPiGVSnfI

fun fact OP:

Most modern CGI that's being made nowadays is being made on physical GPU renderers, rather than dated CPU renderers.

They are essentially using very specialized rendering engines that can output pretty good framerates with high quality real time simulation and subdivision technology. These things are essentially video game engines that are likely very similar to UE4, except they're built to run on their massively powerful custom MAC/Unix systems.

Just to put that into perspective, when toy story was being made by pixar, the only previews available at high frame rates was wireframe previews, and they barely ran at 30fps

It took two extra generations, but I guess we finally got graphics that look like Toy Story. They were promising that shit back before the PS2 came out.

Basically, they're running on specific GPUs that are made primarily for one task which is rendering? It reminds me of the Nvidia Quadro.

Toy Story 3 The Video Game was fucking godly.

I always wondered what kind of physic engine they use.

Consoles. That pic on the right could look a lot more like the left if it wasn't a console game. SSS, higher polycount, better shadows, etc.

Wow. What a difference. That sure is worth the extra $300 it'll take to build a pc.

y, what about it?

...

It's an Unreal Engine 4 realtime animated short

>tfw the PS2 can run games with Toy Story level graphics

>$300
poorfag peat-gavel get out

That doesn't look remotely CGI

pffAHAHAHAHAH.
You realize SSS is on enabled on the right as well little faggot?

The meme came true. We finally have toy story graphics in vidya

The combat looks floaty as fuck. Fuck you Osaka Team you worthless shitters.

Probably only on her face, to keep the console from shitting itself. There's clearly none on her tits.

>Consoles
Consoles are the only reason you get updated graphics each generation.

anyway you will experience this horrible game on PC soon, so be glad consoles exist, otherwise those big AAA titles with shinny graphics wouldn't exist in the first place.

>if consoles didn't exist, AAA games wouldn't exist
Yeah they would, and they'd be actually good games, because they wouldn't have to cater to mouth breathing retards who can't use a computer, and they wouldn't have to butcher them for outdated hardware.

Please god fucking no.

>saving gifs as webms
for what purpose

It's gonna happen m8.

Get ready to hear Thomas Hanks and Jim Allen.

Das rite, CSGO and LoL have amazing graphics for sure.

>watch the Toy Story movies again
>next to no porn of Bo Peep with Andy
fug

Not an argument

>There is a Toy Story 4 in the works

For what fucking purpose (except $$$)

he's back

No, PC exclusives don't do that either, faggot.

Because you had any?
>WHAT IF EVERY ONE HAD $2000 RIG, WOW GAMES WOULD LOOK SO GOOD XD

Because it's entertaining. I hope there's a 5th after that, too.

>meanwhile on pc in 2017

>PC games don't have SSS, higher polycounts or better shadows
Yeah they do, retard.

Never implied such a thing.

>really skeptical when TS3 was announced
>it turned out pretty good, and felt like a good note to end the series on
>now they're trying for four
Why can't companies quit while they're ahead?

>Japanese on Disney characters
absolutely disgusting in every game

Yes you did asshole.
>Yeah they do, retard.
so why are you complaining about consoles?

The pre-render's tits took up too much dedicated ram

...

You don't even need $600 to run games better on PC than you could on consoles.

No I didn't.
>so why are you complaining about consoles?
Because non-exclusives get downgraded all the time thanks to you mouth breathers.

>Most modern CGI that's being made nowadays is being made on physical GPU renderers, rather than dated CPU renderers.
This is not true. Render farms are still using CPUs. Pixar's Renderman doesn't even support GPU rendering.

They do use GPU acceleration to preview scenes, though.

>Basically, they're running on specific GPUs that are made primarily for one task which is rendering? It reminds me of the Nvidia Quadro.
AFAIK, the only difference between Quadro and GeForce is higher floating-point accuracy.

>I can afford it, therefore I should buy it

You're every marketing team's wet dream.

>that one time that KH would going to be even worse than what it was today

>I can afford it, but I should buy a shitty console instead to play at 900p, 20fps for the next 10 years
Really makes you think

good job moving the goalpost.
>"OH NO THERE ARE DOWNGRADES".
Ok, is that preventing you from playing the games on max settings? Btw, can you post your rig?
Because right now it requires a GTX1080ti to play games on 4k/60fps/high.

I still don't understand what the idea was behind that char design. It offers nothing besides furrybait and that's not really square's MO.

I think that was pretty good actually

Furfaggotry aside I really miss late 90s Nomura art

>coming to Xbox One
FUCK YES! I loved Kingdom Hearts and didn't want to have to shell out for a Lamestation. Hopefully it comes to PC too though so that I can run it at 144 FPS.

Never moved the goalpost. Consoles are holding back graphics with their downgrades. Look at TW3, look at The Division. They'd be amazing looking games if it weren't for you shit eaters. What does it help to play at max settings if those max settings became low settings in actuality, for console parity?

...

>AFAIK, the only difference between Quadro and GeForce is higher floating-point accuracy.
The main differences are the different driver set allowing some enterprise applications to run several times faster than with the consumer drivers and ECC memory in selected models. Some of the older Geforces could actually be softmodded to become "Quadros" which let you install the special drivers with the huge performance gains and everything.

>They'd be amazing looking games if it weren't for you shit eaters

They wouldn't even exist if not for consoles

I would've called you fucking retarded a month ago, but that shit really made me think and I think you're right

>waaaaah consoles

Even if a game is PC exclusive they rarely utilise the full potential power because obviously hardly fucking anyone could run it. Most people would be turning the settings right down, which would ultimately make the game look and run worse than a game that was optimised for mid-level graphics.

Look at Crysis, no fucker could run it at max settings at the time and the game looks like dogshit and runs hardly any better if you turn the settings down.

All those games look like trash in comparison to console exclusive aka not held back by outdated pc

You're a fucking idiot who doesn't know what he's talking about

indeed, if not for consoles we wouldn't have to wait out each 5-10 year generation for an update

Yes you are.
You can max settings on PC you shitter.
And suddenly you talk about downgrades.
TW3, The division WOULD NEVER GOT RELEASED W/O CONSOLES you little fag. They are still games that improve the graphics.
Meanwhile BF1, Doom, ie the best games in term of graphics were never downgraded and were still released on consoles.
Now post your rig see if you can play watch dogs 2 with volumetric fog, HTFS shadows, and 4k textures.
Because you seem like a poorfag somehow mad about consoles.

>tfw not gimped down by pc port

If consoles didn't exist, everyone would be playing on PC, making AAA companies unafraid to make games for PC. Currently they are afraid because too many shit eaters use consoles, it would be insane to pass up on the profits from all these retards with low standards.

buying a ps4 next month just for this and it will be amazing.

Cry vfags.

It's not easy at all. The stuff in the OP still looks worse than TS1

Can someone tell me when will pc overpriced pc trash catch up with consoles?

>KH3 at least looks like it's a bit better mechanically
No it doesn't
It looks floaty as shit and vastly inferior to KH2FM

All the trailers so far have shown Platinum/Bayonetta-style Flashy Dogshit. Thanks Osaka Team you fucking shallow retards.

Are Tom Hanks and Tim Allen doing the English voices? If so, I might be interested.

If consoles wouldn't exist, dev would aim at the lowest common denominator, ie shit laptop, which is why Csgo, Dota or PUB are the most popular game on PC right now.

>You can max settings on PC you shitter.
>What does it help to play at max settings if those max settings became low settings in actuality, for console parity?

>TW3, The division WOULD NEVER GOT RELEASED W/O CONSOLES you little fag.
See

0 interactions.

not likely. Chances are we'd still be in a market of mass manufactured "variety" computers like the zx, MSX, c64, amiga, and the like. It was really the NES/famicom that shattered the home computer market and brought a standardized set of hardware to develop games for. No "unique" versions of computers, no premium or deluxe models, you bought an NES, you got an NES, it ran everything, no need for upgrades (well, the disk system but you know what I mean). europe still had that stuff into the late 80s and early nineties but those home computer entertainment devices were totally shut out of every other market by like 88. It's pretty fascinating to read up on the history of the NES in that regard actually.

>My dick, CGI movies in UE4 real-time when
Rogue One used UE4 for real time rendering. We're already there.

>800p

Thats simply wrong. You assume that people would suddenly buy $1000 rig JUST FOR GAMING.
Look at steam survey you little faggot.
AND POST YOUR RIG ALREADY.

Got some examples?

KH3 looks better, it doesn't have that raw power to it that pre-render things have with ray tracing but it does look more pleasent ot the eye

>Being this much of a cynical asshole

No wonder GMT and Leia looked like a video game.

Crysis called

>AAA games would stop existing if everyone played on PC
Not likely.

Limited hardware of the consoles force technical engineers to develop new techniques to do X but at a faster rate. This in turn benefits the PC side of things by not requiring an arms-race of more powerful cards to brute-force a similar technique otherwise.

Nobody gives a fuck about dead, overpriced pc trash.

>chromatic aberration