So why are every games that's on nintendo gets better metacritic score?

So why are every games that's on nintendo gets better metacritic score?

woah...

oh...

It’s called the Nintendo bonus. It’s quite well known

damn...

what's this...

is this real...?

or is this..

fantasy...?

but why..?

are we just here to suffer...?

name one game that does this

lower standard for nintendo games so they get a higher score

Nintendo has a lot of payola and blind fanboys. You know how in the music industry there's an artist who gets pushed with a lot of hype from annoying fanboys and always gets praised by critics for no reason, despite no one REALLY caring for them outside of that? Well that's Nintendo. Nintendo is like Justin Bieber and Beyonce but to the video game industry

>Nintendo is like Justin Bieber and Beyonce but to the video game industry
Seething mad negros can't see the irony.

where's the irony boss

Nintendo bonus
For third party multiplats it's relatively small, but every once in a while you get shit like BOTW that ends up being 10-20 points above what it deserves

Thier memeware gives games a different "feel". For example, playing a game meant for a console on a handheld might actually make the game seem more fun, even if it's the same game.

i say about 6-12 points above

You did an awful job of misspelling Bethesda.

It's a well known fact that porting games to Nintendo hardware is harder and PShitters will eat up all the bad porting anyway.

Nintendo consoles don't get many third party games so when they do get third party support their fans are more forgiving.

You appreciate things more when you have less choice basically.

It's just higher cuz of the nintendo fansites reviewing it

Handheld over console release I could buy, playing the same game at home, versus wherever the fuck you want is a no-brainer.
But this is ridiculous.

>give some random pc game bad review
>nothing happens

>give some random ms game bad review
>nothing happens

>give some random sony game bad review
>nothing happens

>give some random Nintendo game bad review
>violent Djihad

Gee, I wonder why reviewers pamper Nintendo.

He literally just posted like 10.

This, I reckon it's more along these lines, but in the sense that critics are more forgiving to try and boost 3rd party sales on Nintendo, since they're already at a disadvantage.

...

Nintendo Bonus.
Basically ugly graphics are ok in nintendo platform.

Not an argument.

Good graphics are appreciated, but Nintendo fans are seeking creative artwork for visuals and gameplay matters the absolute most, which it should.

Fuck go to twich tv, battlegrounds is so popular and it's a hideous mess. Fun >>>> Presentation

unless your a sony cuck

Nintendo games have low standards.

Click on the websites reviewing them and you'll figure it out. Basically a bunch of Nintendo only sites run by people who rate games far more to the extremes. If a game is good it gets a 90 or 100, if it's bad it gets a 10.

Basically Nintendo fans are either teenagers or have the mental faculty of teenagers.

other genres might not be as fun to play on different platforms because of a lack of controller options*

indies, 3d platformers, racing shit, and sports games (the games you listed), may have just been more fun to reviewers with wagglan than your standard AAA first person shooters. reviewers with huge biases like nintendolife shouldn't be allowed to submit to metacritic i agree though

what score would botw get if it was released on real console? 85?

>what score would botw get if it was released on an underpowered pc?
100

To a Nintendo user, the game reviews better because, aside from those releases, they have nothing. Imagine eating saltines for months and you finally get a steak. You're gonna rate that steak pretty highly because your context for food is saltines or nothing.

The PC and other consoles actually get releases, so a game isn't gonna rate as high simply for releasing. It has to actually "wow" the player.

Plus, whats the difference between an 84 and an 86 in terms of actual, measurable quality? Why should I play the Wii version when it scored 2 points higher? What in the ever-lasting gobstopper of a fuck does 2 points difference mean?

Why trust a bunch of random chucklefucks numbers aside from the fact that you already agree with them? Why trust metacritic, of all places, when the number is all they give a shit about? I bet people that give a shit about metacritic skipped all the review text in gaming mags and just read the score.

NOOO THAT WOULD MEAN SPLATTON 2 IS 75 AT BEST, THATS NOT TREU