People will unironically argue that botw is visually pleasing

>people will unironically argue that botw is visually pleasing

Other urls found in this thread:

github.com/slashiee/cemu_graphic_packs
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Looks very nice to me.

Artstyle is very nice but the graphics can be terrible.

it really doesnt, and no bloom filters from a setting sun will change that

Visually pleasing does not have to mean technically impressive. The artstyle and scenery are nice.

that's the wii u version, switch looks like the top

>switch looks like the top

thats low tier trolling. get better

It lacks LOD, but it's made to run on trash hardware after all.

It can look very nice at times. The game has a very visually pleasing artstyle.

This is cemu right. It looks fucking brilliant in that pic

>The game has a very visually pleasing artstyle.
>low res textures that make the PS1 look advanced
>low poly models
>the worst saturated colors since Skyward Sword

I own and love the game but we all know that's a flat out lie.

Yeah it's cemu, since it's above native BoTW res, also the fire is obviously something I added.

>tfw you murdered just about everything and you're just getting started.

I'm really interested how it'll look when you can play it on PC with properly optimized emulators.
Both the Switch and Wii U are less powerful than modern phones...

can someone explain the desaturated colors meme to me? do developers not look outside? my grass is extremely green, like vibrant, loud green. this is the color of grass. it's not faded out olive. grass is very green, and the sky is very blue. somehow, no one understands this.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

IT LOOOKS LIKE SHITTT

MODS DELET THI S THREAD RIGHT NOW

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

C-C-CRASH IS BETTER

PC cna't fix it cause you also would need to change out models, up texture resolutions, and do a lot of other fixes to make the game really work. You cant witcher level graphics without a complete overhaul.

There's a saturation graphic pack out now, bro.

The game needs that and a texture pack.

>witcher level graphics
So a downgraded piece of shit that looks like a late PS2 game?

A PS2 game looks better than Botw. Take that into consideration

post link pls

Bullcrap: The Post

everything in that post was facts not objective

>PS2 game looks better than Botw
Show me 1(ONE) game

Though the picture I posted it with was not using the saturation pack.

is the only new screenshot I have with the saturation pack, but I've shader-colored link in it.

github.com/slashiee/cemu_graphic_packs

...

take #2

It really does.

The grass alone is amazing and the fact you can actually interact with everything.

take #3

>It really does.
>says this while continuously showing the low res textures of everything and the lack of details in general

I assume it's the contrasty one? Thanks.

Can't see shit
>emulator
>still looks like shit
At least chose something that looked remotely good like SotC, FF12 looked like ass even for it's time.

>this
>looking anything but shit
People like you are the reason why I have no hope in humans anymore.

Even for its own generation FFXII looks outdated, it had two texture layers for water and terrible texture work. Probably the most awful and lazy texture work ever in a game.

Pic related. The protagonist's abs look like holes instead of what muscles usually look like. Literally holes because they are darker than the skin around them.

FF12 is the best looking game after mgs3 on the ps2

Even with an emulator, the fact that upscaling the graphics of Botw didnt fix it on cemu just shows it has a very bad design. Nintendo always uses the toon shader option when they want to hide the fact that their hardware can't do anything more, which is why they went with friendly kid color schemes. It's a usual strategy for making something look bearable with little effort.

meanwhile back on the n64 when they put more effort into their game's looks...

>complains about low res textures
>implies SotC and FFXII look good and unironically better than BotW

That fathomless delusion most Playstation fans have entered. It's incredible.

That doesn't say a lot.

PS2 was weak as hell and even in HD the games look like shit.

and yet, with a supposed to be modern gpu, nintendo still uses less tech than a ps2 game. It's almost like they've been using ps2 and lower tech for generations.

Thank you for reminding me how much better BotW looks than actual ps2 games

I uuse PS2 as an example because that's the level of graphics Nintendo has stayed at for a long time, and yet they can't even put in the effort to go beyond it.

Seriously, how are Sony fans always doing it? That's almost a super power. They are bothered by thing that's in a Nintendo game. Than they play a Sony game and thing is even more prominent, but suddenly it doesn't bother them and they don't even see it.

No, your PS2 games look like ass.

>PS2 was weak as hell

>No, your PS2 games look like ass.
Man it almost feels like I'm back in the gamecube era again.

...

increasing the resolution in tp breaks sunrays and other postprocessing effects, I recommend not playing at higher than 1,5x of the standard resolution and just using 8x ssaa which doesn't break anything

What are you talking about? Nintendo is the only one actually using "tech" that isn't just shitty graphics updates.

>being this butt blasted over a game you've never played

Yet, somehow, the Gamecube version of a lot of games was the best version.

>thread is about graphics
>brings up something other than graphics

Btw, every AAA game has been using physics for the past three decades. Where has Nintendo been?

Can someone explain to me why Playstation fans believe this game looks good? I never understood it. And it runs at literal 14 FPS on PS2 as well.

Gamecube versions were better a few times. PS2 versions were better most of the time.

>every AAA game
>the only game they bring up is Half Life 2
>every single time
>and everyone in the world is asking for Half Life 3 which clearly shows people want more of the mechanics

Jap games are ugly
America games are SJW
Polish games are the future.

POLISHED

I bring up half life to push the point in further that Nintendo is way behind the times. What half life did, every game after it did it casually cause physics is something a modern game should have as a minimum as long as your hardware isnt dated back to 1990.

Why are you using two completely different images?

Random shit games no one cares about and developers who didn't give a shit about the GameCube don't matter. The PS2 is ridiculousy weak compared to the GameCube. Just look at Resident Evil 4, Star Fox, Wave Race, Metroid Prime 2 (fucking 60 FPS) etc.

Most PS2 games that didn't look like shit had abysmal FPS.

For freaking real, where has Nintendo been that their FIRST foray into a physics engine is 10 years ahead of everyone elses? About damn time someone did it right, am I right bud?

>people care about Half Life 3 cause of the mechanics

Are Nintendo gamers really this out of the loop with the rest of the game industry?

>fills up his post with mostly gamecube exclusive games and uses that as an argument

fucking kek

I don't think it's fair to say "behind the times" when no other game since Half Life 2 ever did this (properly) again and developers are way too shit.

It's basically recolutionary again. And BotW did way more than Half Life 2 anyway and has way more vegation.

>The PS2 is ridiculousy weak compared to the GameCube
Your cherrypicking isn't effective my toddler friend.

>Most PS2 games that didn't look like shit had abysmal FPS.
Pot calling kettle black? Twilight Princess had a terrible framerate on Gamecube. Wii version ran smoother though.

>FIRST foray into a physics engine is 10 years ahead of everyone elses
Nintendo's physics is something XBox/PS can do without breaking a sweat cause they use actual CPUs, and not mobile or HP tier cpus.

Why is everyone so desperate to shit all over BOTW lately?

I take it you haven't played Half Life 2, considering Ravenholm was considered its peak which again was because of the interactivity and the things you could do with the gravity gun. Why do you think people loved Half Life 2? Because of the amazing (shitty) gun play?

>tfw when it turns to sun set and she starts back to town but you're a wolf and have to transform away so she doesn't see you, and by then she has left.

>I don't think it's fair to say "behind the times" when no other game since Half Life 2 ever did this (properly) again and developers are way too shit.
Okay, I am speaking to a legit Nintendo gamer who hasn't played a single game outside his consoles.

>nintendo gamers get treated to baby's first physics play since their cpu now barely has reached enough power to manage physics without killing most of their 30 fps
>IT'S THE BEST PHYSICS EVER

You're an idiot if you think we want HL3 just cause of some pretty physics play.

>Twilight Princess had a terrible framerate on Gamecube
No, it didn't. It was pretty much rock solid 30 FPS whereas PS2 games you posted here such as SotC literally dip down to 14 FPS during boss fights.

You are a clown and you should stop getting so mad at video games on systems you don't own. Grow up.

>still no other examples

sotc dipped for reasons that had to do with its cpu, not its graphics processor. Thats why the game was so empty so they could accomodate for the large amount of models being used for the bosses.

>what are the portal games

>game made for a newer console doesn't run well on an older one
wow ya think

>4 months later
>Sup Forums is still buttblastes about Zelda

You mean the game that came bundled with half life 2?

>needing to be told more examples due to never playing non nintendo games

Dude, you can't interact with fucking anything in all the other big AAA open world (RPGs) such as Witcher 3, Skyrim (except for picking up all those pointless items which is... actually completely pointless itself and just inflating loading times now that I'm thinking about it) or even Horizon.

Of course it's amazing what BotW does and people talk about it.

The only reason you can emulate the Wii U is because the source code was stolen. Same would happen with Xbox/PS if there's was. The Wii U has a GPU dual-sided die that it uses so it doesn't have to use a large CPU like a typical tower simulator. When you need a $1000 PC to do the work of a $100 console you know you're doing it wrong.

>game made for a newer console (switch) still runs the same as it does on the older one (wii u)

explain that

I'm not sure how this matters. It looks like shit and runs like shit because the console is a weak piece of shit and the developer a clueless hack studio that favors epic cinematic open world over playability.

>No, it didn't. It was pretty much rock solid 30 FPS
It's like 10 FPS when you visit that fountain you posted earlier. SOTC's framerate isn't great, but it's a game with lighting, post processing, alpha blended fur and polygon counts well in advance of what you find on Gamecube. A few shitty textures (admittedly texturing is PS2's weakest point) doesn't change that.

it came bundled with episode 2 in 2007, and portal 2 came out in 2011

Metal Gear Solid 3. 2004. PS2. Allows you to interact with everything no different from Botw.

All of you are fucking stupid and any professional video game doctor would agree that you need serious help

I'm pretty fond of it. Especially the water and the way the sun reflects off the ground. The game is just so damn comfy to run around in.

What does being retarded feel like?

And yet, its CPU is still as weak as a TI calculator.

And yet, gamecube couldn't handle even a quarter of sotc.

Yeah, there is absolutely no differente between MGS3 and BotW's physics engine and interactivity at all. Absolutely none.

Do you actually play video games?

>Someone using your screenshots

Is this what if feels like to have a gf?

>tiny
>linear
>elements can't interact with other elements

Not the guy you're arguing with, but it's hardly the same. Both games are great for completely different reasons.

>simple textures
>bad LoD
>basic lighting
>low polys
>wont even show the ground cause afraid of being called out for more shittiness

Angling the camera at the sky doesnt make your game look better.

>Do you actually play video games?
Seeing as how you're a Nintodddler who doesn't touch anything other than manchild games and clearly hasn't play any metal gear, I'd say you should ask yourself.

Why would the more powerful system not being able to handle a game that's running on a weaker system?

Holy shit, I am talking to a 12 year old!

Man Zora's Domain is pretty. Do you have any shots when it's raining and water's bouncing off everything?

>that favors epic cinematic open world

Hey ACfag, taking a break from Metroid to shit out your seven-year schtick in a Zelda thread?

Are you really retarded? He is clearly trying to show the huge mountains in the background.

Are you a nigger? You have absolutely no sense of nature or aesthetics, that's usually a nigger trait. Not even memeing.

Most niggers are Playstation fans anyway.

>tiny
>yet MGS can handle large infrastructures and buildings while Botw struggles when in simple towns

ANYWAY

>elements can't interact with other elements

MGS3 is all about elements interacting with other elements so yeah, you're a retard