Hmm

Hmm

Other urls found in this thread:

zelda.com/breath-of-the-wild/expansion-pass/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

That's an expansion pack for Witcher 3 you moron

you misspelled expansion fellow redditor :^)

It's DLC

>Witcher 3 will NEVER get Additional Map Feature

Whoa....

What did he by this?

You're a fucking retard, user
zelda.com/breath-of-the-wild/expansion-pass/

>expansion
>expansion

BULL FUCKING SHIT. nintendo asks $20 for their 2 DLC "EXPANSION"
eat shit nintendofags. raped by Horizon, raped by Witcher

zelda.com/breath-of-the-wild/expansion-pass/

>reading comprehension

Litterally says "two DLC packs" there. Are you beyond retarded?

Again, what did he mean by this?

It literally says expansion pass, are you beyond retarded?

>Zelda's Expansion Pass

The expansion pass is both DLC (underline DLC) for 20 dollars. That image is comparing one Wither 3 EXPANSION to one BoTW DLC.

when you have to resort to semantics then you know you've lost the argument lmao

>judging a game by its dlc
ISHYGDDT

Witcher 3's expansion pass cost $25 for both packs and you get way more content than Zelda's expansion.

Wither 3's expansion is literally referred to as an expansion. Nintendo is referring to their DLC as DLC, what is there to not understand.

You can call the product whatever you want, but that doesn't determine the content.

The Zelda Expansion Pass says that it contains 3 treasures, and 2 DLCs.

The Witcher Expansion Pass says that it has 2 expansions.

Whether or not DLCs should be considered as equals to expansions is a different argument.

OP here just checking in.

Okay continue.

Don't even fucking start. They were 20 dollars each on release. Shut up.

Zelda's expansion is literally referred to as an expansion and it only costs $5 less than both of Witcher's packs and has far less content

>wticher drones sucking CDPR cock again
Where's your 97?

One was $20, the other was $10.

Hmmm, where is it being referred to as an expansion? The "expansion" are the two DLC packs that are released at a separate time. Where's your proof?

You shut up fuckwad. I remember paying $25 for both as soon as the second pack came out. Fuck off. You don't know shit, nintendo toddler.

>Whether or not DLCs should be considered as equals to expansions is a different argument.
It is literally just labeling. They could call it something else and the content would not change.
Witcher 3's DLCs were released at seperate times too, you could get both for $25 which is only $5 more than Zelda and they give a fuck ton more content than Zelda does.

I was wrong, but you're wrong too so It doesn't even matter.

>they give a fuck ton more content than Zelda does
How do you know this when the second DLC for Zelda isn't out yet? Are you delusional or something?

>you can get both for 24.99
Nope, I was right. That is literally what I said. Fuck off.

>""""DLC""""
They are expansions. Stop trying to argue this. CDPR even stated as such. Stop trying to force your retarded belief.

>you get way more content than Zelda's expansion.

Zelda's second DLC pack hasn't even been fully revealed yet, how can you know that you fucking retard?

Witcher 3 gave a whole new region to the map (Toussaint)
Zelda isn't adding a new map region so it already automatically has less content
If you have to argue semantics then you've lost the argument

>TW3 Expansion Pass
>two big expansions

>Zelda Expansion Pass
>small time DLCs which cannot be compared to TW3 expansions
Nintendofags will defend this.

>5$ dollars more than shitty Zelda DLC
>more content than whole BotW
really makes you think

TW3
>$24.99
>2 expansions
>2 new maps to explore
>new story questlines, new enemies, new gameplay mechanics, etc.

BOTW
>$19.99 Expansion Pass
>some customes and weapons...
>Hard mode, and...
>new map feature thingy, whatever the fuck that means, and...
>and...floating platforms...and...Tingle costumes...and..and...and...*wipes sweat from brow*

see

>semantics
Expansions are always greater than DLC in terms of content. Nice strawman.

Nah, you're retarded.

>Zelda isn't adding a new map region
Proofs?

Even with the dlc, tw3 has less content than botw.

There's literally an entire dungeon and story. It's likely there's a new region.

Ahahahahaha

Before the first DLC came out, people were hoping it would add new enemies, even though the advertisement stated what it would be adding (and enemies weren't part of it)
When people were mad about the lack of new enemies, Nintendo drone's excuse was "well they didn't advertise new enemies so why would you expect that? HURRRRR"
Same shit here. They already showed the advertisement for the second pack and a new map reigon isn't part of it. It isn't getting added.

>people don't know the difference between an expansion pack and dlc

Stay mad.
Is it fun to collect 900 pieces of tree poo?

see
Also, there is named mountain region in the northeast corner that is unclimbable. The dungeon will most likely be there.

>TW3
>new weapons, armors, quests, skins and features added as a free DLCs
>Zelda
>people have to buy Expansion Pass to get something similar

This nintenpork mental gymnastics is adorable.

>They already showed the advertisement for the second pack
Where?
>new map reigon isn't part of it. It isn't getting added.
Proofs?

>b-but they called that an expansion!!!!
so did nintendo with the "zelda expansion pass"
>n-no!!! it says here DLC!!!!
fine, but what difference does that make? you're still paying almost the same price for worse (and less) content
>SHUT UP!!!!!!!

>DLC
>Short for "Downloadable Content"
>Expansion
>Noun. the action of becoming larger or more extensive.
>W3's Expansion is downloadable content
>W3's Expansion is DLC
>Zelda's DLC isn't expanding nor making the game larger in any other sense than time

Zelda is DLC.W3 is also DLC by the extent of being downloadable content but by expanding the game literally to a new region, it is an expansion as well.

It's interchangeable in Witcher's case.

Y-yeah, in TW3, you c-can't cut down trees and grass...and climb mountains...and...and...c-cook chilli and m-mushroom and fish...and...climb tower...and...and...

>CDPR released a downloadable Expansion pass thats full of content
>hurr its not DLC (downloadable content)

the official Zelda site has been posted ITT already, that's where it's advertised as such. Dumb faggot drone.
Nintendo's official Zelda site advertises it as an "expansion pass," find a new excuse nintendo drone

>20 IPs
Pathetic bros

Still, for some reasons, mad about a very good Zelda, incredible, I'm not sure why people like to make console war "arguments" when every company have different plan for every game and in both cases these plans are not bad for us.
>nintendobaby
>sonyforcefags
>m$hills
This is not an adult or a teen behavior, it's just stupid.
Enjoy what you have.

>it's okay I'm getting less content because semantics
I can't believe people are actually arguing this

Where does it say that there will be no new map?

If it isn't an expansion then why does it need an expansion pass?

Calling it an expansion pass means expansion level content. Nintendo is being deliberately misleading, and delivering far less than its players paid for. By far the worst DLC practices I've seen from any company since 2014

>HAH THEY USED LUBE WHEN FUCKING MY ASS TAKE THAT!!
Are all witcher 3 fans this pathetic? Bottom line is that you are cheering CDPR for selling you an incomplete game while charging you to complete it

What is expansion level content? You don't even know the full content of the expansion pass even

But these are expansions which were made after release :^)
Parts of the game ripped from the game and later sold are called DLCs.

Do you see anything about new regions here? No? Then its not happening.

Whereas Nintendo ships an incomplete game and charges you the same amount to put on a tink costume and have enemies hit for slightly less damage.

I don't remember having to own the expansion pass to play Witcher 3 hard mode. All the cosmetic DLC for the game was released for free as well.

>made after release
I think people really believe this. It never happens for any game
absence of evidence is not evidence of absence

You're right. Also can't ride a sand walrus, cross dress and trick a desperate loser to hand over his shoes, create a circle of fire to be uplifted into the air to rain fire and bomb arrows on targets, can't snowboard, can't complete 1020 puzzles.

But I guess you can use your Batman sense to track a chimera

Its not just that. None of the new Zelda DLC armors even have new abilities. They just copy them from armors already existing in the base game. And they can't be upgraded so they're objectively inferior to the armor you ALREADY HAVE without the DLC

Hmmm but you know that is not all there is to the pass. Why are you lying?

You can't see the future and you can't predict it. For now, it doesn't exist nor will it. If Nintendo announces it, then it exists.

>DLC
Who the fuck cares, who even pays extra for a game once it finishes? Cucks, all of you

Do the world a favor and neck yourself. Your whole family should do it too, the world would be better off with your blood line no longer existing in this time line.

>Top: Random Western no name indieshit with """cinematic""" cutscenes that no one has ever heard of
>Bottom: Well known Eastern series that everyone has respect for with gameplay valued first

Yeah, I know what I'll have.

>cross dress
Yeah I'm sure this is a huge plus for you, you AIDS-ridden homosexual.
>m-muh boypussy xD
>liking Link isn't gay I swear

>What is expansion level content?

See top image of original post
>You don't even know the full content of the expansion pass even

Actually we do
And it's still not enough content to be called an expansion

Do people who buy Nintendo products do anything other than swallow this garbage all day?

Nintendo drones getting salty as fuck in this thread.

Once again, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. If you say there are no new regions where will the new beast/dungeon be even placed?

Boy can't wait to play that 1 new shrine 3 months from now when the second "expansion" drops

Hey that Zelda DLC came out right? So what did "additional map feature" end up meaning

Actually we do not. DLC 2 is not released yet. We have no idea how long the new quest will be, or if it adds anything. We didn't even get any trailer of it yet, it's impossible to tell how long is it or what it adds

No, it is evidence in this case. Just like you Nintendo drones used the excuse
>hurrr the first DLC pack doesn't advertise new enemies so why would you expect that???
Well now the tables have turned, you're trying to shill something not advertised and most likely not happening.
Nintendo faggots are the biggest hypocrites and flip-floppers on this board.

hmmm but it's specifically mentioned to be not a shrine though
The first pack also did not mention the armours. Where does that take your argument?

How will western games EVER recover???

I'm looking at the site right now and the first pack's ad does indeed advertise the armor

No it still isn't regardless of other people's actions, especially when they added stuff not mentioned in the DLC description.

You are forgetting the entire second pack that we have very little info about in BOTW.

This
>ahah you can buy dlc for your game and I can buy an expansion for my game ahah

Use archive and look at the site before the first pack released. There was no such thing

I started browsing Sup Forums again after taking a long break, and I saw that image about "minutes since Sup Forums cried about botw" or something and it's fucking true. There's always at least one thread crying about botw in the catalog, it's amazing.

So no one is allowed to criticize the overpriced DLC that barely adds anything? What kind of logic is this?

>huge expensive DLC for a shitty game
vs
>small cheap DLC for a good game
Hmmm...which one is better I wonder...

>barely adds anything
Save this for after Pack 2 releases at the very least

You're not criticizing shit, senpai. This thread is made specifically just to suck Witcher's cock.

Is this thread what counts as criticism to you? Really?

You're right Zelda is a shitty game.

I'll keep saying it until proven otherwise, thanks.
I didn't make this thread
>ITS ONLY A VALID CRITICISM IF I SAY SO
Whatever you say Nintenbro.

Nothing counts as criticism to you Nintendo drones because you all genuinely believe that Nintendo never does anything wrong.
Even when someone criticizes trash games like Star Fox Zero or Color Splash, Nintendo kiddies call them shitposters and insist the games are actually good.

Maybe wait until December/January when we'll have actually SEEN and PLAYED the DLC?
but then you'll just start bitching about the new amiibo, won't you?

Then why? Just to shitpost? To get (You)s? You are literally posting on imperfect information to rile people up. Ignoring part of the expansion whose content we know so little about does your criticism and argument no favours

Calm down, sweetie. There's no need to get so triggered.

There's a 5 dollar difference between bundles though, how do you defend zelda stil? Also.
>buying dlc for a children's game

Who are you talking to? Star fox 0 and Colour Splash are below average games, but some people will like them if they haven't played the previous games in the series. Those people should be disregarded like the shitters they are.