In hindsight, did it really deserve its score?

In hindsight, did it really deserve its score?

Yes

no, it's the worst 3d zelda

yup

It deserves a 98, which is its real metascore anyway.

Should have been 100

yes

On a realistic standard? No.
On (((game critic))) score wise? Definitely.

no game deserves

I haven't played it so i wouldn't know

OoT is both better and far more influental than this game will ever be, this shit being two points away from it is an insult. No it doesn't deserve it.

No

It was fun and it had some really cool stuff, the fact that metal weapons actually conduct electricity and things of that nature, but it wasn't above a 90

Even with all the shitposting reviews I think the user score is probably more accurate. It's a very good game but they could do more with it. Cracks start to show as you get toward the end of the game, but the things that are wrong with it are just not very significant.

>re ddit the post
so anti nintendo of you to stand up and say this game is shit

Metacritic is an abomination.

In any case, I personally just thought it was okay. Lacking in many areas. I hope the sequel has more of what makes Zelda Zelda.

Yes! It's the best zelda game and the best game this generation.

yeah

No, 7/10 game at best.

>boring world
>boring combat
>boring dungeons
>terrible bosses

Should have been higher desu.

I hope this answers your question.

Yah

have you seen the trash that's above 90?

swap the numbers and I'll agree

can i play this on emulator at 30 fps if i have i3 6100 and gtx1050ti?

Yes if you're playing it on a PC.