>85 metacritic
Surprise, surprise, this was fucking great. Way better than Uncharted 4. The pacing, the set-pieces, the writing, it all worked really nicely.
Too bad Nadine and Chloe didn't kiss, even though there were moments... All in all, a 9/10. And those fucking graphics, 4k HDR jesus christ. You could tell it wasn't native 4k, but I finally feel my LG B7 was worth buying.
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
>reviewers liked it
Is this a surprise to anyone though. Reviewers eat this kind of shit up and Sony knows it.
Stop stroking it. It was a DLC that was fun and went right along with UC4 but no better.
accurate
Are you kidding me? UC4 was way too long and boring. The Scotland chapter? Fucking disgraceful.
TLL didn't really have bad moments like that at all, I view it more as a continuation of the original trilogy, whereas UC4 was a big misstep from ND.
>people really like open-world games with interesting concepts
Gee what a shock. They're all pretty samey on the surface level but each have their own unique quirks unlike, let's say, Assassin's Creed games.
Numbered (I,II,III,IV) AssCrud is more unique than most generic Sony schlock, though. Plus they had pirates, so that automatically gives them the win.
Get the fuck out of here Druckmann. You're a goddamn cuck. You've done a mighty fine job or running the ND image
Amy Hennig and Bruce Straley are the only reason ND was a good studio
>Druckmann
he was not involved with this game...
Why are games with hideous females allowed?
YASS QUEEN :D
where the fuck was the lesbian mud wrestling scene I was promised?
>caring about metacritic
>caring about steam reviews
>caring about youtube reviews
>caring about any gaming "journalism" site
>not forming your own opinion as a singular human being who has different preferences and tastes of anyone else
Does this game get supernatural and shit like 1,2, and 3?
Most underrated post on Sup Forums
>people really like open-world games with interesting concepts
WTF? First of all the games in my picture are linear 3rd person shooter/action adventure games, not open world games.
Second, the games in the pic are not interesting or have any interesting concepts. They barely have any "quirks". They all nearly have the same generic 3rd person shooter gameplay and they rely on their SUPER DRAMATIC OSCAR WINNING NARRATIVE and "cinematic experience" as a main selling point instead of just being a good GAME.
Uncharted and the like being better than AC? Maybe, but in my eyes they are both not very good for slightly different reasons.
I think UC4 would've benefited from extra scenes which deals with Drake's problems with his family instead of making a quick jump and making everything solve itself out of nowhere
Uncaharted 4 had a lot of filler and barely any action. This game felt more focused and didn't drag on. Dat fucking Train-Convoy hybrid level was amazing, hadn't had that much fun in Uncharted since 2. Lost Legacy had stuff that Uncharted 4 was severely lacking.
The Uncharted games are solid third person shooters. Do you expect them to get a 6/10?
Game of The Year definitely. I can't wait what Naughty Cat has in store for us.
The only two games that could be argued to have the same generic 3rd person shooter gameplay are uncharted and the last of us, and even those two feel pretty distinct.
Amy, and Bruce fucked up pretty big with 3, and Druckman followed it up with two homeruns.
No, only 1 & 2 are explicitly supernatural I think?
TloU was the only thing better than 3. He's a cuck.
The DLC for TloU was shit and now it's getting an edgy and unneeded sequel
Yeah he's a cuck xD Neil KEKmann amirite?
It was enjoyable. There were a couple bits of dialog that made me rolls my eyes but nothing insufferable or Tumblr-grade, which was nice. It was a good add on to Uncharted 4 that made up for the lack of Chloe. But it definitely wasn't better than Uncharted 4, if for no other reason than how short it was.
The only real downfalls I can think of is how the game starts out like a movie you just walked in on an hour late (there's zero build up or exposition), it's length, and the fact that gameplay wise it's literally just more Uncharted 4 with nothing new. But it was originally supposed to be a DLC chapter for Uncharted 4 so none of that is surprising.
>all those screenshots are of completely different characters in completely different environments in completely different genres of games, literally the only thing they have in common is being third person
Either you're retarded, or you're confused as to what "template" means.
>liking games that are trying to be movies
Why don't you watch movies instead of "playing" games?
Because that's not what Uncharted is. It's cutscene heavy but it's very much a game. Video games have had cutscenes since the PS1/N64 days. Final Fantasy games are closer to being movies than Uncharted is.
Why did you even bother replying if you are just going to spout shit?
youtube.com
THEY FIXED ROTTR
>all these triggered neofaggers replying to the truth
Saved pic for future use.
>High review scores means it's good so buy it guys!
The fact that you're here shilling this game means that it's selling like shit and for a good reason. Also reviewers gave shit like ME:Andromeda good scores even though it was a complete horse shit game. I don't trust reviewers and you shouldn't either.
>Bruce
Bruce didn't do Uncharted 3, he did TLOU with Neil