What are some games with complex moral choices?

What are some games with complex moral choices?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CPhXKak_bHw
youtube.com/watch?v=d82E82pUIPE
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

God Hand

Games can't into morality

only right choice is not to play

Ikaruga

>rip the lever out
>jam it into the train wheels
>nobody dies

t. Spec Ops The Line dev

>Tram derails
>Operator dies

...

this reminds me, the game you're looking for OP is Spec Ops: The Line

Zero meme dilemma

This one'll always be my favorite.

Came here for this

Joke's aside how many videogames present you with a situation like this? As in: Don't act and a lot of people die vs Act and few people die but you are directly responsible

Complex moral dilemma incoming

Would you rather have infinite oreos but you can never drink milk again, or you get a lifetime supply of milk an oreos but you are lactose intolerant, and also a manlet

Is the milk skimmed or not?

>Spec Ops
It is not a "choice" if I am only presented 1 possible course of action

>being a manlet
>ever
I'd take the infinite oreos. Then resell them for infinite milk

I already don't drink milk so it's an easy choice.

What are you going to do with that milk? You can't ever drink milk again, ever

isn't there medication you can take before eating to prevent the symptoms of lactose intolerance? In your scenario, would you be able to take this medication?

>and also a manlet
never mind

turn them into infinite yoghurt

...

you can't dunk oreos in yogurt though, that woul be nasty

...

>unironically eating processed carbs shit
i am fine with my yoghurt

someone post the "sick loop-de-loop" please

...

>the loop goes outside
HOLY SHIT THAT'S INSANE

Minecraft.

Not many that I can think of. There are some with moral choices, like 7th Dragon 3's postgame, but it's not that complex (perpetuate a possible world of great suffering and inevitable demise or snuff out any chance at new life for them to spare them from a doomed existence).

>and also a manlet

Infinite oreos with no milk

SOME

PEOPLE

youtube.com/watch?v=CPhXKak_bHw

Infamous

He deserved it for getting into such convoluted situation.

thanks, coposter

Nice

Mass effect

Depends
Do they infinitely stack up, or can I summon oreos on command???

This is a fairly important philosophical dillema right now.
Some car manufacturer recently, I forget which, was testing how their autonomous software copes with having to chose a vehicle to collide with - an suv or a quadbike.
It chose the quadbike every time, even if it meant swerving into it

Shouldn't it be dependent on the speed the vehicle is traveling at?

...

The Mass Effect did that incredibly good.
Similairly, going Sith in KOTOR was pretty good aswel.
New Vegas was pretty good aswel.

Fallout 3/NV/4. I get autistically stuck wanting to be on everyones side

Im still mad. Devs were just to lazy to write her back in the story

Mass Effect trilogy*

are there any games like this

???

...

kek

>moral choices
Psshh

this is such an epic thread

infinite oreos
drink them with tea

...

This is easy. Which is cheaper and/or easier to steal? 3 watermelons or a bucket of fried KFC.

>no one's posted any of the /sci/ edits
unfortunately, I don't have one where the top track is as in pic related and the bottom is empty

it's a joke you dip

oreos a shit and I'm already a manlet but I don't want to be lactose intolerant so I'll take number one

bottom to save more

I have NEVER seen this thread before

What?

huh? the top track saves 1/2 people and the bottom only 1/12

I don't get it.

Titanfall 2

...

If it hits the quadbike, you're looking at fewer casualties than you would with a head-on collision with an SUV.

You should be able to solve this

You're wasting everyone's time with the detour, so it's immoral.

youtube.com/watch?v=d82E82pUIPE

It's [math]-\frac{1}{12}[/math], you brainlet.

They're both infinite.

Bottom of course, that's 375% chance to negate all damage

Prey

One is killing people at a slower rate, and since the trolley will break down sooner or later, fewer people will end up dying in the end.

>meticulously calculate the odds in the dirt as the trolley comes rocketing closer
>mathematically determine the bottom track is better
>send it down the bottom track
>all five die

Upper: 15% of everyone surviving
Lower: ~23.7%
Lower, of course.

Depends what game. I know if its xcom, I'm going to kill all 5 of them

There are so many people on the tracks in the bottom one that the trolley will surely get stuck, saving many lives in the process.

killing -1/12 people [math]\equiv[/math] saving 1/12 people

>24% chance of no casualties but 37% chance of 2 or more people dying
fuck man I don't know I don't like those odds

THAT'S XCOM BABY

...

That's xcom baby

Fuck man I hate thinking about this. Your consciousness dies but to everyone else you're still alive and it doesn't make a damn difference, but I don't give a shit about some idea of me living on, I want this consciousness to stay

after any finite amount of time, more people will have died on the bottom track, but after an infinite amount of time -1/2 people will have died on the top track and -1/12 people will have died on the bottom track

...

If its based on how we currently understand teleportation, then no; its a perfect copy of you made a split-second after the original you has been deleted.
To everyone else and the copy, you're still you, but your concsiousness is destroyed. Its like that underwater game or that Seventh Day movie with Arnie.

Move to D3?

D4! I meant D4 fuck those people would die because I can't be assed to check the right number

pawn to e4

...

go fish

...

Can't it be D2 and D4?

B so the train does a sick slam dunk on all those idiots lying on the ground

!!!

Is that Australia? If so, default to save the world from emus and abos.

no, because then Albert wouldn't know the answer

>both options kill you
I should be able to multitrack in this one more than any other trolley