Who is the Lars Anderson of video games

Who is the Lars Anderson of video games.
youtube.com/watch?v=R8dBQVDROdA

>drags up a form of trickshooting common in 19th century circuses and pretends it's a revolutionary new form of combat archery

Peter Molyneux?
Not many people have the balls and the ego to lie about themselves on this scale.

>Ancient Arab archers were circuses
How new are you? Do you know anything?

Ancient Arabs didn't use light-draw circus bows for combat.
That clown was debunked years ago and this is a bait thread.

>That clown was debunked years ago
And he debunked them with a simple respnse videos. He is simply showing examples of their feats and practices. With or without light-draw bows.

>Scythians
>Huns
>Mongols
you dont know much about ancient warfare do you?

Jesus Christ, don't rip your butthole stretching it open for him.

And disgraced circus trickshooter Lars Anderson does?

Inafune

I dont care about the individual in question but the idea that taking difficult shots on horse back or emphasizing rate of volley is "circus trickshooting" is nonesense we have accounts from the Greeks and Romans of how scythians and mongols fought who did just that

>I dont care about the individual in question

Then fuck off, because this thread is about the individual in question is completely unrelated to whatever's triggered your autism.

If someone points out Errol Flynn's fencing was inaccurate showmanship, do you go on a rant about how acktchually fencing was a genuine martial art?

well actually nobody else cares but you about him.Its the content that was being discussed

Ah, so you're just completely disconnected from reality.
I'll leave you to it.

>Trickshooting and film effects is historical

This thread is now about archery in history and vidya

then delete your e-celeb thread faggot no one cares

I didn't make it, faggot. I pointed out that Lars is a known fraud.

GookMoot removed the ability to delete your own thread regardless.

we dont care
Hes a show shooter but the points made in the video were valid

His points in the video were pretending that show shooting is somehow relevant to historical combat shooting, which it is not.

Again I feel the need to point out that Errol Flynn was not a historically accurate combat fencer, you seem to just take anything you see in video at face value.

what like firing as much arrows as possible as quickly as possible ?
firing from a horse?
firing at moving targets ?
trying difficult shots?
yeah they were never done historically with horse archers

>Lars is a known fraud.
Yet has debunked faggots who tried to debunk him for attention. Are you an Archfag? If so, it makes sense.

hes no Archfag. He doesn't know anything about historical combat or archery.
he purely fixated on the show shooter