If you haven't completed every single version 100% you are a filthy casual who lacks appreciation for the cozy world of...

If you haven't completed every single version 100% you are a filthy casual who lacks appreciation for the cozy world of hogwarts

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_and_the_Philosopher's_Stone_(video_game)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Potterhead
>calling other people "casuals"
What

>not 100% every port of DOOM
that also includes the port to your printer's LED display, scrub

>Not playing DOOM on traffic lights

Haha...casuals....

The apparently "cozy" nature of Hogwarts does absolutely nothing to detract from the fact that it remains one of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>not 100% every single WAD
I have over 200 000 hours of playtime pleb, get on my level. I've been playing Doom every single day for 6 hours since it was released 25 years ago. There are also like 20 new WADs released every week, so you can imagine I'm pretty busy.

I feel truly sorry for all the shitters who had to play the ps1 version instead of the pc one

aren't some of the versions the same? like weren't ps1 and pc the same?

Is that a pasta ?

Absolutely not. Ps1 was superior in every way.

I never said the movies are good morons. In fact I had Harry Potter fans and hate HP movie fans. I mean the hardcore fans who dress up like Harry Potter and swallow everything Rowling throws at them without questioning it.

There is however nothing wrong with liking the 7 original books. And maybe the vidya, but not because you like HP but because you like vidya.

>the sorcerer's stone
amerifats out

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_and_the_Philosopher's_Stone_(video_game)

PS2/GC/Xbox were the same

Someone's lying.

Shut up faggot. You sound like a fucky brony trying to justify his shit taste.

This.

sorry you had a terrible childhood user

Well at least my parents prevented me from reading steaming pile of shits such as Harry "plotholes" Potter.

Surprisingly every game is totally unique.

There aren't just ports stripped of features to work on a weaker hardware. They are totally new games with a new approach.

>Not enjoying Harry Potter means you had a shit childhood.

oh yeah i know that, i layed gba, gbc, and pc versions

i just remembered reading that some versions were the same. but it was just a multiplat on 6th gen consoles