Good and evil are two sides of the same coin

>Good and evil are two sides of the same coin.

Yea, that's how it works.

yep

Only if you watch too much anime.

>good and evil are two sides of the same coin
>game won't stop shilling the neutral side

If you disagree then how about you give your opinion on how it works?
I'd love to hear your thoughts.

Evil, by definition, is a perversion of good.

>vampires and werewolves are two sides of the same coin
But Pachira a shit

What if the coin has no sides

That's pretty neat, user. I didn't know that.
So what's the definition of good, if you don't mind me asking?

Then it's a super ball

That which conforms by natural law as identified by Aristotle, Aquinas, etc...

>he cares about useless fictional constructs like good and evil

How many trench coats and katanas do you own?

So machines and robots are evil because they're not natural?

I'm not sure I understand completely. Would you mind giving me an example of something good and something evil?

yes? you can't have good without evil

That's called naturalistic fallacy.

I do not accept reductive physicalism or metaphysical naturalism and believe their growth have destroyed the West. Just read Thomas Nagel's Mind & Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.

"There are two types of people in this world: Evil people with evil intentions, and evil people with good intentions."

From same setting: "There is no such thing as good in the world, just evil and greater evil."

It's like WWII's Eastern Front.

>So machines and robots are evil because they're not natural?

They are just tools. What people do with them may or may not violate natural law.

Other way around. Evil is parasitic and only exists when good is deliberatly misconstrued.

So basically humans are evil because we attempt to go against the natural law?

>doubting Ainz
the ends absolutely justify the means, ultimately the only thing that matters is results
which honestly works in favor of most major religions, and against atheism or Japan

yeah

>Other way around. Evil is parasitic and only exists when good is deliberatly misconstrued.

No, both are relative terms, and are completely meaningless without something else to measure them against.

What is good without evil? It just is. Same with evil, without good, it just is.

Good is whatever glorificates the society you live in. Evil is whatever dishonors it, even if the society might make the Evil seem like the Good.

You know, what if all life is evil? You have a universe filled with nonliving non organic matter and then through some unforeseen tragedy the unliving becomes living as it springs forth from primordial ooze.

the books literally have alignments for the characters and ainz is canonically evil

If you LITERALLY read the books you'd see Ainz constantly acting out of alignment and basically only being concerned with benefiting Nazarick regardless of morality, including fucking monologuing about it in the latest volume.

Racially, Overlords are supposed to be chaotic evil beings that hate the living. Ainz is at worst lawful evil, he literally wants to create his own perfect society where niggers hold hands and sing small world.

That raises the question of what the definitions of glory and dishonor are and what constitutes each.

>there is no objective good or bad
>bad guy is a serial murderer who kills people for fun while the good guy is a goodie two shoes is a gary stu who hasn't done anything wrong in his life