Miyazaki in charge of burning From to the ground

This isn't funny anymore. Where the fuck are they? Where's the new ARPG reveal?

Other urls found in this thread:

ign.com/articles/2016/09/21/from-software-working-on-3-games-one-of-which-is-armored-core?abthid=57e287075a178f5c40000006
cinemablend.com/games/1558969/from-software-has-3-games-in-development-none-of-them-sound-like-dark-souls
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Be AC fan since PS1
>Know that FROM is an underground dev team
>They release one (1) game called Dark Souls
>Instantly become a Triple AAA studio after making games for decades and being underground
>Finish series and Miyazaki wants to go back "underground"
>Fans rage as they feel entitled to know what's going on and what are they currently working on

I think It's time I stop supporting FROM, the normalfags have taken them from us.

Games take time faM. they just got off a massive 4 game crunch. they want to breath

Probably making a quality game unlike most studios including old FROM.

Im expecting at The Game Awards in December. If it's just ANOTHER fucking Soulsbourne then I won't give a shit one way or the other. A new Armored Core would be nice, a new A.C.E would be even better, but I KNOW that ain't happening.

GIVE ME ARMORED CORE VI ON PC REEEEEEEEEEEE

Armored core is factually happening.

Whether it's their next game or not is the question.

>Stop playing games you like because of a fanbase
>Not doing anything you like because of a fanbase

How retarded can you get?

They are making the next Fable for Microsoft

Reveal on PSX December 9.

>Armored core is factually happening.
Oh I knew that, I just don't know when.

>ree fucking yearly souls games cod hurr durr
>wtf where's my yearly souls game miyazaki ree

>Stop playing games you like because of a fanbase

You mean

>Cater to Normalfag, fuck our og fans, never release a game for our REAL fans until 10 years later or some shit and when we DO make sure we cater to our NEW age fan too, completely fucking our og fans

Like every single Japanese studio today all thanks to normalfags..

>Triple AAA
>"underground"

I'll never understand how this matters. Is it about self-importance? "Hurr durr, I like things that aren't mainstream. This makes me cool because its cool to like things that aren't mainstream. Hurr". What's the difference? If you like something, chances are other people will like it as well. Chances are lots of people are going to like it. How does popular appeal change the things that appeal to the populous? Answer: It doesn't. So what changes, then? Answer: Your perception.

tl;dr - grow up, user.

What the fuck are you even going on about? Armored Core V only came out a year after Dark Souls did and was only 4 years after For Answers. From is a small company that has never worked on more than two games at a time.

When- wait, why do I even have to explain this to you? Do you live under a fucking rock?

To keep it short;
Not popular = Make whatever the fuck you want! Just do it!
Popular = Make what sales AND ONLY THAT. NO! You cannot make whatever the fuck you want anymore. Focus on this money. These $$$$$$. Focus! $_$

ACV catered to western audience and real ACfans don't give a flying fuck about ACV because it's shit and died off fast as fuck. While ACFA is still being played today.

They're currently working on a switch exclusive.

I want it on steam though :(

It's a bit of self importance and some other things. I think a large part of it is because some people just want constant approval from their peers, and as something gets popular the people who are vocally toxic towards it grows as well, to the point where it looks like the people who hate it outnumber the people who like it.

I had a friend in high school who loved Daft Punk. It wasn't really popular in my country back then. A few years ago I asked him if he had listened to RAM when it came out and his repose was "It's dubstep garbage." Low and behold this was right after it had gotten super popular. I have a feeling Sup Forums influenced him as well.

You're absolutely insane if you think ACV catered to western audiences. I didn't like it much either but nothing in it points to westernization in any way. If you mean the drastic turn in gameplay style it's the same going from Last Raven to 4. With V they wanted to slow it back down but keep some of the mobility of 4.

I mean, so do I. I want every game on PC if I had it my way but I still have a PS4 for shit like Bloodborne (literally the only reason I bought the console and I still don't regret it).

>I didn't like it much either but nothing in it points to westernization in any way.

Slowing it down is exactly that, and the more grounded aesthetic and lower tech of the Mech designs and the emphasis on the war metagame is all full on catering to Western audiences.

You're an idiot. Every company sets out to make their game make bank. And just because it succeeds in that doesn't mean they're not doing what they like.

Show me one ACV video/webm that can even compete with this high octane speed. Fuck off with your slow tactical marine garbage.

>Slowing it down is exactly

So basically what you're saying is

>I started playing AC with 4

Patience my son.

Faggot.

Nah, fuck your face.

I started AC with 2.

Those games were slow but they were still a hundred times more Japanese in design than V in literally every fucking way imaginable.

Temper your ambition you mouth breathing fucktard

You really never played before 4 have you? Many AC fans love the slowed down pace of the older games. It creates gameplay with much more finesse required to dodge shot and missles.

Such as?

Same here. I have a great pc, but also have a ps4 pro for bloodborne and other exclusives. No reason to ever buy an xbone. I'll buy a switch when there's games though.

Give me Chromehounds 2 any day of the week.

>And just because it succeeds in that doesn't mean they're not doing what they like.

hahaHAHAHA Oh man

>DMC4 becomes the highest selling DMC game
>"Fuck it, let's Reboot." Introducing EMO May Cry

Anyone want a new King Field cuz i sure as hell do

>Different company
>Many years afterwards

You can really stretch your line of logic can't you?

Except they've always been massively popular. How the fuck do you think they managed to have 4 or even 5 series running parallel to one another all at once? demon's souls was just an explosion of the kings field styled games they'd been perfecting with evergrace into the mainstream.

>Different company
Capcom published the game and sought them out to make the game you stupid fucking nigger. It was Capcom's Idea.

They still didn't actually make it you dolt.

Who is the entitled one again?

The last FROM game I bought was ACFA which is almost a fucking decade ago. It's going to be 10 years soon and AC6 will probably be western shit + dark soul mixed combat, placing even more restrictions on the combat than ACV. Which will be my final staw on the matter of if I will follow FROM or not. Honestly, fuck them. You fucking normalfags are cancer, you literally came in and took everything from us while also removing anything you didn't like/we actually did like. Holyshit I hate you normalfags so much.

Kameo was amazing.

you've literally been saying this since E3. First E3, then Gamescom, then TGS, now PSX. Hell even before E3

>enchanted arms

my fucking nigga that game was comfy af. i remember breaking the game getting that summon that gets your emeies to 1hp hard af to kill but once you had him it was easy street.

The Genji sequel was total garbage though. People only remember it because of NOW HERE'S THIS GIANT ENEMY CRAB.

That said, Folklore was sensational. I'm still a bit sad that it was a commercial flop to the extent where Sony didn't even want to throw money into a low-budget PSP sequel.

>Starts with 6 bad games
>Ends with 6 good games
sounds good to me

Jesus christ you sound pathetic.

One of these days, a new age of normalfags will appear and will pray that they fuck over any and all of your favorite franchises just like what you did us.

Large AAA studios take fewer risks than smaller studios.

When a game costs 10 million and has a team in the hundreds and its failure could sink your studio and put everyone out of work you're not going to be gambling with your jobs and your company's survival on totally new ideas like you would if the game cost half a million had a team of two dozen and if it fails the company is fine.

Demon's Souls is not the kind of game a AAA studio can afford to make, too many untested, unprecedented ideas at once, strange asynchronous online multiplayer, crazy new combat system that's very slow and deliberate, controls that are intentionally unresponsive, a punishing difficulty that only gets harder as you lose, all in a market that's trending in the opposite direction, ect. A AAA studio can only make Bloodborne and Dark Souls 3, games with very few new ideas but a lot of polished old ones that have been proven successful. They had Demon's Souls and Dark Souls to work off from, they can hire more staff, spend more money and deliver a more expensive looking game but it's very hard to go back to creative smaller games once you've set yourself up to make big ones.

Sure is a shame Fable will never be good

Folklore suffered from being one of the early DLC adopters. Shame because it's a great despite re-using levels for two characters.

>Where's the new ARPG reveal?
someone has to commission one, and it won't be sony with bloodborne's sales numbers

Strange that it's not actually on the PSN store, despite it being a Sony-owned IP, as well as the fact that the DLC is still up.

It's not studios, it's big publishers who cannot change their corporate ways. You can see even EA having a phase when they supported new IPs an whatnot, but when they didn't turn out to be multi million sellers like their established franchises they quickly rank into the ground.

devs went bankrupt and sony doesn't care

It's way too fast though. It sure looks good and fancy but holy fuck you can't make out anything during the faster fights.

ACV on the other hand felt too slow.

>you can't make out anything during the faster fights.
Glasses-Kun, is that you?

Why is everyone so antsy to see a new release from them? It hasn't even been that long since the last DLC for Dark 3 released. I'd rather they take their time with a new game than rush shit out the door.

Yeah, I know about the whole thing surrounding Game Republic and Okamoto going insane, but it's just weird considering they've got other early PS3 garbage up on the PSN store that sold worse than Folklore did.

EA needs just ONE bad year when their sports series fail and they would go bankrupt.

people have been waiting for an actual good fromsoft game since das3's initial release, more of the same boring sludge won't soothe them

>AC
>Underground
>When fucking everyone who owned a PS1 knew about it.

FROM outright said they wanted to make ACV have more western influence and mechanics.

They wanted the Chromehounds audience to return, without having to make CH2 "you can play our other mech game too"

>AC hasn't been good since Masters of Arena.
>Underaged want a new one because they want to pretend they liked From before Dark Souls.

you mean since CH2 was confirmed for a no-go right?

Dragons/Dark/Demons whatever souls was probably FROM's most financially successful but culturally worst game.

>Genji
Shit.
>[eM] -eNCHANT arM-
Had a auto-lay mode that was so bad that that you could do nothing all the way up to the final boss. Basically giving Telltale games a run for their money on least amount of gameplay.

Murdered Soul Suspect was also Asian as fuck of a game. Watch a minute of the credits and count on one hand how many non-chink names you see.

That list doesn't suggest the games are good/bad, it simply points out that everything is the fucking same just like today - nothing but 3rd person story adventure triple aaa titles.

Then if they shit out mediocre games every year, you'd be complaining about that too. There's no winning with you people.

I know you meant well but...
>controls that are intentionally unresponsive
That's not true. The controls are perfectly responsive. It's just that all your actions have longer wind ups, and cool downs compared to other games.

>he didn't like highspeed robot action
what a fucking faggot 4 answer was amazing game, then again I'm also a faggot because I liked formula front too

Fucking Mike from GTA? Really? He’s only one of three characters and he doesn’t fit the “generic rugged action star” at all, he’s a depressed retired bank robber with a shitty family.

This bait would work better if you said 4

4 was shit though.

I'm just saying Last Raven is the darling of the fanbase and that came out after MoA.
Hence your bait would be better if you said 4.

Sounds to me like you're shit, answer was to the older AC games what BB was to ds1, old and busted jank vs new smoothness

I want kings field vr exclusive for ps4

The other guy is right you really are a retard. Something can be POPULAR while still being GOOD. Its just up to the devs to not give up their creativity and to make the games they want instead of make safe garbage. The Shining is extremely popular but also a great film from an era when there was great overlap. Same with Dark Souls. The reason most console games today, and triple A are hot salty garbage are because of the disappearance of the middle market, which is exactly what kind of game Dark Souls is.

Middle market games are games with middle budgets but can blow up like Dark Souls. Jak and Daxter, Ratchet and Clank, San Andreas are examples of this back in the day. However now publishers try to control this now which is why you get copy paste slogs like Ubisoft games. From isn't Ubisoft. They have clearly shown Dark Souls WASN'T a fluke and can make great games without anything going to their head. Mkayazaki didn't even want to be president, he wasn't ambitious. It was a middlemarket game (where all your favorites come from) that exploded. Also, the indie scene on PC has taken over the middlemarket which is why 2017 was so good for games.

4's control scheme didn't outweigh its terrible missions, shitty online play, mediocre story mode, and overall just being a bland game. The graphics were also atrocious, but that's to be expected.

You seem to be having some withdrawal OP

Yeah right you pretentious faggot. No way you havent bought a from game in 10 years. Unless you are that big of a douchebag. Your own self importance prevented you from playing great games like demons souls, dark souls and bloodborne. I bet you dont have any friends because you come off as a fucking douchebag

Get the fuck over yourself dude, hot damn. From isnt even casualized at all top kek. How delusional can you be?

Then explain why Dark Souls 2 and 3 was such hot trash compared to the first.

Popularity is a bane to good games.

>From isnt even casualized at all top kek.

>He says this while ignoring the casul friendly DaS3 with infinite roll spam and chugging 2fast 4 u

3 still is 100 years ahead of your typical AAA ez mode casual garbage. I found it fun and polished even if you can roll spam (they wanted to make the game faster). Whatever mistakes they made were the results of risk or trying to change it up as opposed to pandering.
DeS > DaS btw. Everyone sucks DaS off because it was the first souls game they played.

Am actually kinda piss off at the people who want from to return to those shit mech games.

rather then wanting them to keep moving forward you want then to return to hell.

>Popularity is a bane
You sound like such an elitist hipster asshole. Over fucking video games. I guess I forgot where I was for a sec though. Besides, there can be a whole litany od reasons why a game or sequel is inferior. It isnt always the casual bogeymen (though call that out too). I cant stand casuals and people who think we should be able to skip bosses either. But the analysis goes deeper than "dose casuals killed muh game". Stop being a part of the Sup Forums hivemind and actually learn how to think and critique for yourself.

>DeS > DaS btw

Well you arent wrong. DaS is a proven fluke.

And even then is loses the real grim atmosphere that DeS had.

>when a spic posts his shit opinion in broken english

> Stop being a part of the Sup Forums hivemind and actually learn how to think and critique for yourself.

But I wont. It's already cemented here that DaS3 is inferior in all forms compared to DaS1 and that's going to be my stand on it. And I dont doubt it has got something to do with Bamco wanting DaS3 to become a tentpole franchise in gaming similar to TES. But good thing Miyazki pulled out before it was too late.

Fuck these megacorps.

AC6 and a new IP (strategy RPG) will be anounced at PSX this year.

3 has great bosses and fun areas minus the swamp shit. Cmon.

You all literally have no argument because it's true. Had you not liked Dark Soul I would be playing AC7 or 8 by now. Fuck you faggots. Dark Soul is shit anyway.

- You move like a fucking snail
- You attack like a fucking snail
- All you do is spam roll
- Constantly needing to use potions
- Multiplayer is just two dudes dancing until the other misses a beat and gets whack'd
- The Graphics aren't even good to compensate the shitty gameplay

And the worst thing of all is... normalfags call this "INNOVATING COMBAT". Then they look at my high speed octane combat and say it's not innovating at all and it's boring while playing the slowest game in the history of mankind called Dark Souls. Holy fucking shit man. You fucks need to leave gaming and go watch anime or some shit. My goodness, you casualize everything you fucking touch.

>Atmosphere
Thats why its my favorite. And has some of the best bosses of course, as well as my two favorite areas in any De/Da souls game (Boletaria and the storm skelly place)

DaS1 wasn't nearly as good as you want to pretend it was. DaS2 is just slightly worse despite being mangled by corporate meddling, and DaS3 was only bad because it was incredibly uninspired. As stand alone titles they're both solid games.

By your own retarded opinion DaS2 is apparently the best because it was the least popular of the five Soulsborne games.

bb > demons > ds1 > ds3 > ds2

Except I played DeS before DaS AND FROM MADE KING'S FIELD BEFORE.

Demons Souls was just an evolution of King's Field. Stop sperging out you self important buffoon.

I thought you fags were tired of soulsborne games

I post this every thread and never get replies:
They're making three games:
>Armored Core
>A game that "will probably comply with the expectations from the fans in straightforward manner."
>VR, "weird" title

ign.com/articles/2016/09/21/from-software-working-on-3-games-one-of-which-is-armored-core?abthid=57e287075a178f5c40000006

cinemablend.com/games/1558969/from-software-has-3-games-in-development-none-of-them-sound-like-dark-souls

>Also, the indie scene on PC has taken over the middlemarket which is why 2017 was so good for games.

This. Last gen seemed to have done its damndest to kill the middle market with couple of flukes that made it.

8/10 youre committed