"realistic" RPG

>"realistic" RPG
>female characters don't start with -3 STR, +3 INT

nice shitpost boyyyyyy

back to with you

>not -2 STR, +2 CON

Get a grip.

>+3 INT
>Not +3 CHR

Shit opinion

> +3int

>females
>+int
>realistic

>not 3 ranks in gynomancy

>"realistic" RPG
>women have combat roles

It's +3 CHA not INT you fucking casual

>not -5 str, -3 con, -14 int

+3 int

Female characters should start with a - in every stat, they are weaker, have less stamina, are completely outdone in academia by the fewer male counterparts, they have no charisma cuz vagina unless you want to include the easiness of persuading with a vagina in the score, they have less luck because born female.

They should have a bonus to bartering and dexterity though.

more like +3 SUC am i right guys? lmao

+20 CHR vs. Men unless they have the gay debuff

more like +3 HOR

-3 int -3 str

>+3 INT
lmao no
you're thinking of charisma

itt: small penised virgins

>no clairvoyance perk
>have sex with several NPCs, not prego

-5 STR
-3 INT
-10 WIS
Also with a "useless" permanent debuff.

t. toasty roasty

The average insult a woman can throw out is towards manhood. It's almost cute how this is a global constant.

-2 STR
-1 INT
+2 CHR
+1 DEX

My vagina is bigger then yours which means i am the alpha female here, shut up now

Good thread.

>Sup Forumsirgin character
>starts with permanent "crippling inadequacy" debuff

Holy shit the amount of incel bitterness ITT

That would be even more retarded. A realistic RPG would be -5 int -5 str and you start with evil karma and hundreds of gold stolen from your ex-husband.

>female characters
>smaller hitboxes, higher DEX (smaller fingers can be more dextrous), higher AGI (think ballerinas, gymnasts, etc)

>male characters
>higher STR, INT, CHA

Can it work?