Why the fuck do people do this?

Why the fuck do people do this?

usually because an update comes out ruins the game for them

That man has a strange relationship with his pets.

Why the fuck do people do this?

>dog analogy

>News about a video game company keeps getting deleted

I wonder if this thread about shitty video game reviews will survive?

I don't fuck games though.

Must be an asian reviewer.

Why the fuck do people do this?

What's hiroshimoot doing now?

What is he trying to say?
>after 1600 hours it just isnt like playing it for the first time, man
He honestly needs help. 1600 hours is no joke and that epic review shows he has autism or atleast mild aspergers

WE HAVE TO GO DEEPER

why the fuck do people do this?

Maybe the game was good but turned into shit?

A former Naughty Dog employee claims he was sexually harassed when he worked with them two years ago. It's probably nothing big really, but the mods don't like it, so they keep deleting the threads every time someone makes them.

Speaking from the perspective of someone who's done it themselves, games can change and get totally ruined my updates and become something totally different than what they were when you first pumped those 1k hours in.

to save people from making the same mistake

also online games change

I'd rather listen to someone critique a game they know like the back of their hand than someone who's left a review after playing two and a half hours saying "gr8 game i like it :D"

>1661
>he played 26 hours after writing that review
wew

Where will it end

to be fair daybreak is one of the worst developers to ever exist and only live to make good games and them ruin them slowly over time because they don't give a shit about the people playing it.

...

People becoming asspained that their shitty game got shittier. Don't fall for the early access meme.

>expecting value from steam reviews
also: more hours = more informed position (in general)
do you prefer it when timothy who has 26 minutes of playtime reviews it? "i didnmean to buy this, and i dont like these games"

This doesn't explain the examples were the game hasn't been updated.

PEEEEEEEEOOOOOOPPPLEEEEEEEEEEE
PEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPPEEEEEEEEPEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOPPEEEEEEELLLLLEEEEEOOOOOOOOOPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPOOOOOOOOLPOOOOOOOOPPPPP

>when the meta goes too far

Criminally underrated

>H1Z1
>good
>ever

>it's another food analogy episode.

...

>enjoy game for many hours
>new game comes out in the same genre that has everything good about the first game with a bunch of great changes amd better gameplay
>dont recommend the first games since it is now an inferior version of the new game

There, a real world example that doesnt involve the game being updated

>I've only gotten 6000 hours of playtime out of my $20 purchase, better give it a negative review.
Amazing.

...

...

>h1z1
>good

jesus christ, it was a BLATANT cashgrab by Smedley as SOE was dying and about to be sold off to some sleazy hedgefund that would assfuck the players even worse than SOE itself did (it assfucked them a lot.)

>early access/alpha tier
>zombies
>crafting
>sandbox
>microtransactions

how anybody falls for these shameless cons I don't know, I guess early access survival sandbox crafting PvP games have a masochistic and dumb audience who'll keep letting devs fuck them with shit like Rust/h1z1/ARK/pubg

...