Why was Mario land so much better than mario world?
Why was Mario land so much better than mario world?
Anything is possible when shit taste is factored in.
Is this one of those single man memes?
your shit taste
it worked on the tiny 3ds screen
it's only problem was that it was a tech demo with level thrown infront of you without a order
Tighter level design.
Because the levels were designed around one player so they didn't feel open and were actually challenging. I don't know how else to put it. 3D Land was just more memorable I guess. Also the controls. 3D World had that shitty run mechanic which even sm64 didn't. (a game it pioneered by 2 decades)
The 3d was also used a few times. Which was neat. Only other game I've turned the 3d on for was Kirby
Land was a hundred times easier than world. Even the bonus worlds were a breeze.
...
You have dementia.
not a real 3D Mario :^)
Because 3D Land felt fresh and was a great game to show off the 3DS's capabilities with. It was the first time they mixed 2d and 3d gameplay like that, so it made for a memorable game.
3D World is just more of the same, except this time it's not impressive for the system it's on. And due to lack of stereoscopic 3d, depth perception is completely fucked in some areas.
...
Because Super Mario Land wasn't lazy or rushed like Super Mario World was. Hell, even Super Mario Land 2 is better than Super Mario World.
Easier how? The only actually difficult mario games are romhacks. So making hyperbolic statements like that serve no purpose
>even Super Mario Land 2 is better than Super Mario World.
Now now.
>3D Land
>memorable
don't you ever get tired of pretending?
Don't you?
he would know since he's a pokemonfag
unlike you do
My arguments are on the table. Yours not
The truth will set you free.
What about Lost Levels? Pretty sure that was a hard Mario game, even if it was pretty much an official rom hack.
SMW has better controls and you can actually see.
Just my 2cents
Okay. That was 2 decades ago though.
This thread reeks of samefag.
rude