FUCK YOU! gta 4 had 2 big DLC's for story, those lazy greedy fucks calling themselves developers these days

FUCK YOU! gta 4 had 2 big DLC's for story, those lazy greedy fucks calling themselves developers these days.

fucking jews did this.

Rockstar screwed there fans. No new games for over 5 years so that they could continually push Shark Cards for extra cash. Don't know how anybody could be excited for RDR2, single player might be good but the multiplayer will be 10x worse then GTA V's.

Both of the GTA IV DLCs and Undead Nightmare flopped sales wise, I do not understand why anyone is the slightest bit surprised that GTA V never got any singleplayer DLC.

>Franklin underwritten as fuck
>Nothing but dull government villains
>not necessary

...

>It was three games in one
FUCK YOU.
Fuck you with a rake.

>Rockstar without Leslie Benzies
More like a RockSHIT amirite, fuck em
I hope the Housers die in a fire

Translation: Haha Fuck you, we lied

>three games in one

I actually liked GTAV's missions but this is blatantly untrue.

Can you really call them lazy if They instead dedicated themselves to putting out more online content?

The real answer is that they make 10x more money a month than the initial sales window from a single player dlc would be off of microtransactions

this is why its 'unnecessary'

gta single player has always been shit anyways
cant wait for red dead online

You know red dead online is going to be the same as GTA v, riddled with microtransactions

If gtav online was like ivs I wouldn't mind but it's not.

This. I love shark cards!

Yup, never buying another GTA ever again.

>only 69 missions
>separated by three characters

Fucking why? Did they miss the point of the games being about progressing from a lowly street thug to a criminal empire operator?

lots of ungrateful players here. kinda surprising given all the free content

i bought gta 4 and both it's dlc's for like £6 the other day to replay them because i'm bored as fuck of gta 5. also got rdr undead nightmare for like £3 off amazon to play because i haven't played it before.

looks like i'm going to be playing rockstar games a lot for a bit. both games with their dlc should keep me busy till 2018 at least

GTA 5 had enough content imo, it didn't need story DLC, and if it did have story DLC what story content would be interesting enough for them to make? Lamar DLC? A DLC pack about Franklin's Aunt? Chop Ass Sniffing Adventures? I dunno. I think it was the right move this time.

I bought all 3, in GTA 4 case I bought both on Xbox and PC. They were amazing.

Should I buy GTA V retail or steam version?

>a fun alien invasion dlc in the same vein as undead nightmare isn't possible what a bunch of fucking hacks. Leslie Benzies was pretty much the only person worth shit there.

Pirate it, not worth buying since its at the end of it cycle

Unless you want to play online which is shit

because they said they were working on it in an interview with gamespot a few weeks after GTA V came out.

>Bought all the single player DLC stories for GTA4
>Haven't bought any DLC for GTA 5

Their loss.

Not really, online is pretty fun, heists, races, etc. The only downside to it is long loading times.

>What would they do?
Franklin Lamar adventures fighting niggers. Michael movie studio adventures fighting jews. Trevor Phillips industries fighting the world. You know, something other than shitty heists with no pay off for FIB faggots.

Anything really. Plenty there to work with.

I thought there was way more story to it when i was on the 'final' mission. was disappointed it was over. never cared to play MP.

was not worth the money desu

It isn't necessary. They should just release a huge game with tons of content and not hold back portions as DLC/Season Passes/etc.