Galaxy > Galaxy 2 > Odyssey >= 64 > Sunshine

Galaxy > Galaxy 2 > Odyssey >= 64 > Sunshine

Prove me wrong.

How the fuck is Galaxy 1 better than 2? 2 literally has better level design AND more content.

you're wrong

/thread

prove yourself right first fag

>Comet observatory
>Better atmosphere
>Better soundtrack
>Galaxies are a lot bigger and don't have stupid gimmicks

They ditched everything that that made SMG a masterpiece, and instead they made Super Mario Bros: In Space. And where the fuck is this "shit ton of content" anyway? SMG is clearly longer.

>instead they made Super Mario Bros: In Space
you are literally complaining that they added platforming to a fucking platforming game? Wow.

op is right bump

>i actually agree with an op for once
This is a weird kind of feel.

64 > Odyssey > Galaxy 2 > Galaxy 1 > Sunshine

Depends on what you're looking for.

Mario will always have a more limited moveset in the games where level design shines.

Me personally, I find myself constantly going back to the games that give you more freedom of movement and remember the games with better level design fondly, but not replaying them

Galaxy 2 > Sunshine > Odyssey > Galaxy > 64

face it

Yes!

retard

64 > Sunshine > Galaxy > Galaxy 2 > Odysshit

no u

wew lad

64 is better than Odyssey

t.Nintendo's target audience

3D land > 3D World > Galaxy 1 > Odyssey > Sunshine > 64 > Galaxy 2
If you're wondering why Galaxy 2 is so low that is because it's a lazy cheap rehash of Galaxy 1. Should of been a 10$ dlc instead of a full priced game.

6/10

Lol
Even Sunshine is better than 64 and that game is shit.

Switch 64 and sunshine OP and you have my list.

I think Sunshine is a good game, it's just not a good Mario game

this isnt even bait you just threw the fucking fishing pole

>Not putting Mario 64 first, eternally, out of principle

OP kill urself

Yeah, I will, Galaxy sucks. There, your tanking is invalid.

Not OP but for whatever reason I had more fun with 1

So it's as simple as that why I prefer it.

Galaxy 2 > 3d world > Galaxy > 64> Odyssey> 3d land>sunshine

>3d world this high
>galaxy2 over galaxy1
>64 better than odyssey and sunshine
kill yourself i mean it

>3D World being better than anything other than Sunshine
This is bait

Why does everyone here have shit taste

Galaxy > Odyssey > Sunshine > Galaxy 2 > 64

>B-but 64 is master peace!!
It's garbage.

64 was the only good 3D mario. The series should have stuck with 2D and pick up where SMB3 left off.

I recently played Galaxy and am currently playing Galaxy 2. There is no way you could honestly think Galaxy 1 is better.
SMG is longer because you spend an enormous amount of time walking to right world on the observatory and going through the at least 2 and a half minute long song and dance between entering the observatory after completing a level and entering the next one.

SMG2 is what SMG was supposed to be. Not weighed down by the story as much, somehow even more aesthetically pleasing, smarter level design, Yoshi, the VASTLY improved comet coin system with more variety in what the different comets actually make you do, the VASTLY improved travel time from your starting spot on the hub to the level select screen, hungry lumas have to be fed with coins now and tweaked movement. SMG Mario feels quite sluggish compared to SMG2 Mario. It's a small difference, one you barely notice unless you play the two games back to back, but SMG2 definitely controls smoother. Less delay, less sliding, smaller turning circle.

Sunshine>64>3d world> 3d Land>Galaxy 2> Galaxy> Odyssey

I prefer to have actaul platforming in my mario game

why do you dislike sunshine so much? to the point of ranking 3d land higher

>I prefer to have shit platforming and shit controls in my Mario game

Odyssey=64=Galaxy 1 and 2>Sunshine

I agree. 64 was 5 years ahead of its time at the very least.

but I dont like Odyssey

Trying to organize the 3d Mario's is pointless. They're all within spitting distance of each other as far as quality goes.