More people have been to the MOON than are playing Lawbreakers today.
More people have been to the MOON than are playing Lawbreakers today
Other urls found in this thread:
skyandtelescope.com
twitter.com
Shut the fuck up.
>tfw you could be a top 10 lawbreakers player in the world
Hi, Cliffy
Unironically got a chuckle out of me.
This shit is too good.
Moon landing was fake though
It's more plausible that we landed on the moon than it is 10 people are actually playing Lawbreakers right now.
Fuck off Sup Forums
OBSESSED
If you enter the server and topscore, you'll literally be the best in the world at something.
OBESSE
we should find these 10 people and interview them, anyone got ballbreakers? get in there and get some steam usernames
>12
This is pretty funny when you consider that the development team must be at least like 50 people
>common conspiracy theory is now Sup Forums exclusive
Fuck off with your boogeyman.
You fuck off first, Sup Forums. You're the only retards on this site dumb enough to buy into that type of stupid shit.
And only 6 of those 12 astronauts are still alive. Youngest being age 82. You will very likely live to see a world where no living human has been on the moon.
But it is not plausible that the tech to transmit live when the landing ocurred existed.
/thread
Let me guess, the jews were also involved?
Not him. I'm black and I don't visit Sup Forums but I don't think we've landed on the moon either.
...
This thread is comedy gold.
I hate Sup Forums as much as the next guy, but the moon landing shit sems pretty solid
USA just wanted to win the ebin race of landing and communications in space barely work fine these days and it is been shitton of years since then
There's so much wrong with the "live" transmition of the moon landing. Radiation levels, additional radio chatter in the background, strange shit in the footage and other stuff. Plus even Kubrick would drop hints about that shit in his movies.
Well, if we follow the conspiracy theory then it involved both FBI and CIA, so take of that what you want.
If you watch the NASA channel when they stream
They have cuts and technical issues and it is motherfucking 2017
So yes, I say it was fake
Why people have such a hard grasp that most techs we use today were conceived in the 40-60's.
They put a reflective surface on the moon when they landed and it's been confirmed by multiple countries that when a laser is shone at it it is reflected back.
Everything has technical issues no matter how modern it is.
see
How is it possible that early tech didn't have any hiccups while current does? please explain this bs
But yet the "landing transmission" goes perfectly smooth
One is getting scraps from gov and working with numales while also transmitting 24/7 to motherfucking youtube and other billion channels.
The other has the fulll backing of the state and the entire nation to make minute long transmission in burst which even has big hiccups like Armstrong first landing where you can barely hear Armstrong say "a giant leap".
The answer is simple. Kubrick.
This. Every piece of new tech, the government and military gets first.
Then everyone and their mom slowly gets the commercial type.
This. Moon landing deniers are autistic.
>Landing sight is absolutly nowhere to be found
>But this reflective surface? Easy!
Are you retarded, of course the reflective surface is easier to detect, the method for finding it is simpler.
They'd be able to find the landing site from there, if it existed.
But nope, all these years later, not even a hint of it.
Cliffs B is loose.
lmao you tell em, all these moon landing believers what sheep amirite????
You don't need a man to put those, though. Even soviets had put their own there.
>you'll literally be the best in the world at something.
You already are best user.
You're best at being yourself.