Which one was better?

Which one was better?

As a game: Divided
As a story: Revolution

gg /thread

MD was felt unfinished and rushed. It skimms over many cool characters and story aspects in an insulting manner.

Mankind Divided ruined everything.

The one that doesn't give 10% of the profits to black lives matter.

fpbp

I love both.
Can't really understand the hate for MD, sure the story isn't amazing but everything else makes up for it.

this

With all the DLC is the story in Divided finished?

Same. I did all the side missions and had no problems with the length. I just wish Squeenix wasn't run by complete idiots.

The gameplay and level design are improved, but it's kinda hard to keep going when the plot is dull and the characters aren't compelling.

the one where he didn't ask for this

Mankind's got a weaker story but stronger gameplay. Despite all the hate I was just happy we got more jensen

I'm not sure, I bought them in arecent sale but haven't played yet. Judging by the synopsis, it's not important shit at all, just a new area to go through for cool gameplay moments and one nostalgia DLC where you meet Pritchard.

I never saw why people didn't like the shooting in HR
it's perfectly fine. in fact it's great for what the game is trying to accomplish. if it made running and gunning more feasible it would ruin the stealth. and any time stealth is opional in a game it's instantly ruined. see: dishonored. what a piece of shit.

Remember how it was supposed to come out in Feb of 2016 but they pushed it six months. Can you imagine how much more shitty the game would have been on release. I think we dodged another andromeda thanks to that

2011, its a fucking complete game

fucking 2016, nah no, fuck that shit.
the final boss you can knock out JUST LIKE ANY OTHER ENEMY IN THE GAME!

i beat this game on the hardest setting too. it had no ending, just more questions and it would have been like 1/4 the length of DE if put against it.

MD was gutted because bad goyim didn't buy enough lootcrates. HR wasn't. Take a guess.

fpbp

Liked them both. Just hope we get a third that takes the best aspects of both and puts them together with bigger environments and levels.

>the final boss you can knock out JUST LIKE ANY OTHER ENEMY IN THE GAME!

This is a good thing.

The DLC doesn't have much to do with the main plot at all.

>6 years ago

Jesus Christ, I'm wasting my life

The gameplay felt better for sure, but it feels like the level design was way easier in MD. I didn't take things like invibility either game, but compared to some areas of HR, it didn't feel challenging at all to sneak through the entire game. I think it's a little bit both of easier levels and AI that didn't get to put high alert tracer on you the split second between getting spotted and taking them down.

See, I found Human Revolution to be an incomplete game. All of the areas in Detroit seemed relatively underused, plus there was a major lack of variety in places traveled to like in the original Deus Ex. Another thing I didn't like is that the ending of the game was the three-button challenge like in the original game, and considering their dedicated fans hated how they tried to work all of those endings into Invisible War, I was disappointed that the lesson wasn't learned. Human Revolution also has several augmentations that are completely worthless, which was another let-down after having years to think about the game.

However, it does make up for it with the characters and the interactions they have with each other, not to mention the characters remain how they're presented to us for the entirety of the game, instead of suddenly having a heel-faced turn. That's the game's strongest point, in my opinion. You never feel "taken out" of the scene by someone or something happening. I also like how the game does provide you with all of the resources you need to complete a level in whichever way you want to, providing you're willing to look and pay attention.

It was both of those factors that made me reluctant to pick up Mankind Divided, because I could tell that it was going to be another Invisible War, and more than that I didn't like they got rid of David Sarif's voice actor who genuinely made the character.

This but Revolution's story was pretty bad too.

>I found Human Revolution to be an incomplete game

It clearly is. Between shit like outsourcing the boss fights because they didn't have time to do them inhouse and major plot points having to be released as DLC later because they didn't have time to finish them before the game was released anyone who claims HR was a complete game is a moron. They even cut an entire hub area. The best you could say is at least it doesn't feel egregiously incomplete, just noticeably so.

Wait..what?

I love both, but I slightly prefer HR. I wish MD had more than one hub city and a better story. Otherwise it's a pretty good game ruined by a greedy publisher.